Opinion: Mourning Breitbart the Man, Not the Pundit

Thursday, March 01, 2012 - 05:01 PM

So many people are dying, it seems. Christopher Hitchens, just before Christmas. Whitney Houston, on the eve of the Grammy Awards. The brilliant and courageous war correspondent Anthony Shadid, last month. Wednesday, Davy Jones. You remember Davy Jones? Why, The Monkees, of course. How quickly we forget. 

These people have nothing in common, of course.  But for one thing:  They were all relatively young. 

So today, I stepped it up on the Stairmaster, at my gym, in an effort to avoid my own early demise.  As I did, yet another name flashed across the screen. 

Andrew Breitbart.  Conservative commentator.  Dead at 43. I stopped in my tracks.  This time I didn’t know what to say.

I’d had plenty of words for the others on my Twitter feed:  Davy Jones, “super-talented and underrated;” Whitney, a “tragic, from jump;” Hitchens a “brilliant writer, thinker and social critic whose death leaves a vacancy in our profession;” Anthony Shadid, a “pioneering journalist who reminds us of the risks reporters take every day to keep us informed.” 

But with the death of Andrew Breitbart, I didn’t know quite what to say.

Don’t mistake me.  I am no longer stunned by loss of life, however young the deceased. Fifteen years of reporting on crime and violence has inured me to that. Any remaining vulnerability was wrenched away on 9/11, when I was dispatched to Ground Zero for ABC News.  I stayed on the story for weeks. I lost friends. Friends lost friends. And family. Many of them very young.

Still, Andrew’s death is dreadful.  That I knew him, knew something of his life, makes it sadder still. He is a father, a husband. There are four little children, of no particular political persuasion, who will be without his presence, his care, his guidance, his love, forever.  That is terrible, whatever we may think of his politics.

And I did think about his politics.  I didn’t like  his brand of politics or the way he practiced it.

I often wondered just what Andrew was doing.  What was the point of it all.  For, it certainly was not civil discourse.  In a world that is complex and complicated he presented things a simple and absolute.  He was clearly gifted, talented, fiercely dedicated to his point of view.  And while I often shared his jumping off point – that the news media is broken – his fix for that dysfunction was to retaliate with propaganda of his own making – right-wing paranoid conspiracy theories.  

Like Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity and other ideologues who prowl the airways and World Wide Web, fueled by outrage at a democratic system that he perceived to be working against his white male privilege, Andrew would simply make up the facts he needed to support his outrageous theories when there was no substantiation for them.

 He happened to get it right with Anthony Weiner (the congressman had been sending salacious photographs to women online. At first, Weiner said that his Twitter account had been hacked. He later admitted his misbehavior and apologized to Breitbart).  But Breitbart was dead wrong his posting of a deceptively edited video purporting to show racist statements by Shirley Sherrod, then an obscure African American official in the Obama Administration. Sherrod, whose story actually illustrated how she overcame feelings of racism to help a white farmer save his land, was fired.  Embarrassed, the Agriculture Department offered her a new job.  Sherrod sued Breitbart for defamation and the case is ongoing.  (Now, it seems, Sherrod will have to proceed, if at all, against his estate.)

But I also saw another side of Andrew.  The so-called Green Room, in media organizations, is a funny place.  People get along there, whatever their political point of view.  They are civil, at least, and more often than not, friendly.  I saw Andrew there many times, over the years, most often at Fox, but elsewhere, too.  He was an extreme extrovert, always openhanded, gregarious before an appearance.  Then, he would be cutting, biting, ferocious on the air.  Which may say as much about our little game of political punditry as it does about Andrew Breitbart.  


More in:

Comments [4]

Jack Jackson from Central New Jersey

About as much to applaud in Mr. Breitbart's journalistic 'achievements' as there would be for a person that pulls fake fire alarms.
ACORN...a hoax;
Shirley Sherrod - clearly edited for effect;
NPR - again edited to show an incomplete story;
Andrew Weiner - unfortunately the congressman was dumb enough to make the hole deeper.

In life, truth should be all that matters but as Mr. B. has shown us politics ain't life. Maybe that the root of our problem.

Mar. 04 2012 05:28 PM
walt kovacs from Los Angeles

im sorry....but he wasnt much of a man...and so i dont mourn him

nor do i feel sorry for his wife and kids....they are better off without that pos in their lives many good husbands and fathers do you know that go out drinking after 10 pm, leaving their families alone....for that is what that great man did the night he ate it

rot in hell andy

Mar. 02 2012 04:27 AM
BC Armstrong from Flushing

"Which may say more about our little game of political punditry than it does about Andrew Breitbart."

What, he was drafted, he wasn't a volunteer, is that what you're saying? Nonsense. The current cesspool of punditry is defined by the people who choose to wade in it; what your observation of Breitbart's mode switching says about him is simply what we already knew: that he was a conniving con man. His "little game" caused real damage to real people.

Mar. 01 2012 10:10 PM
sally from SOUTHEAST USA

I am a 65 year old grandmother of no political persuasion but a solid Conservative.
I do not belong to the TEA Party although I know a few people that I suspect might.
I follow politics closely and the death of Andrew Breitbart breaks my heart.
He was a treasure and is irreplaceable.
My deepest and most profound sympathies to his family.

Mar. 01 2012 09:14 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


About It's A Free Blog

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a blog, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at



Supported by