In Fresh Direct Move to the Bronx, Food Delivery to Borough Not a Priority

Monday, February 27, 2012

A recent deal with Fresh Direct is expected to deliver a $255 million economic boost to New York City, but it won't necessarily deliver food to the doors of South Bronx residents who live near the online grocer's planned facility in Mott Haven.

The company currently delivers to residences in only four of 27 zip codes in the borough — all of which are among the areas with the highest levels of median household income in the Bronx, according to 2010 Census Data.

Mott Haven, the location of the planned facility, has a median household income of between $25,000 and $50,000. The citywide median household income is $50,285. 

Expanding delivery services to more of New York City was very low on the list when the city, state and the Bronx negotiated the deal that was announced February 7, according to Fresh Direct CEO Jason Ackerman.

"It wasn't really a big topic that we discussed," he said.

Fresh Direct has promised to look into ways to expand deliveries in the Bronx, but according to Ackerman, past efforts to do so have failed.

"We have always felt that the Bronx has not wanted our service, and we've seen over time no natural request for our service," he said.

(Graphic:The point farthest south in the proposed location of the new Fresh Direct facility. The pins above above show the zip codes to which they deliver.)

But many Bronx residents said they would welcome more fresh food delivery, especially since several neighborhoods in the area suffer high rates of obesity and diabetes.

"Everything around here is frozen," said Cecilia Depass, 47, who is unemployed and lives near 178th Street and Grand Concourse. "The fruits are not sweet like they should be. The vegetables is not good like they should be."

She added, "I'm not trying to sound prejudiced, but the white people get the good stuff before the poor people do.”

In return for putting down roots in the Bronx and creating approximately 1,000 jobs, the company will receive a suite of loans, grants, tax credits and other benefits from the city, state and organizations in the Bronx equal to $127.8 million. There are strictures Fresh Direct will have to abide by to get the money.

So-called Excelsior tax credits from the state will only begin to be distributed once construction of the new facility is complete, and several tax credits offered by the city, paid out over 25 years, will only be available as long as the company stays in the Bronx.

But very little of the money — only the $4.5 million from the Bronx borough president's office and the Bronx Overall Economic Development Corporation (BOEDC) — is tied to Fresh Direct expanding its delivery services in the Bronx.

The company signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the borough president and BOEDC promising to discuss expanding service. According to the MOU, the company could lose the Bronx funding if it does not comply with its terms, which also include the purchase of 10 electric trucks as well as hiring and job training quotas.

BOEDC President Marlene Cintron called the understanding "binding" but conceded that if Fresh Direct does not meet all the requirements, the company would not necessarily lose the money.

"It depends on — If they do seven out of 10, if there are articulable reasons why they didn't do others, then, I mean, there are no absolutes." she said.

Community Board 1 member and Mott Haven homeowner Mychal Johnson was not convinced that the language in the MOU is strong enough to hold Fresh Direct to its promise to extend delivery service to more of the Bronx.

"The non-binding," he said. "If you want to locate your plant here, where you can get all kind of great subsidies and grants from our tax dollars, then you should at least deliver to the community that you're trying to reside in."

With reporting by Sharyn Jackson

More in:

Comments [7]

lorenzo from mott haveen

i have a commercial driver license looking for a drivers position

Jul. 19 2012 01:59 PM
shakima jackson from new york

it's as if WNYC serves the 1% and looks the other way intent on ignoring when a community opposes the imposition of more trucks and non-essential waterfront siting of yet-another unwanted industry.

WNYC writer states: "A recent deal with Fresh Direct is expected to deliver a $255 million economic boost to New York City". Really!? Who expects that? A source is important to weigh its credibility.

WNYC's writer states: "But many Bronx residents said they would welcome more fresh food delivery, especially since several neighborhoods in the area suffer high rates of obesity and diabetes."

What about having a grocery store - perhaps one unable to cut insider deals to get huge taxpayer giveaway - in the South Bronx? Isn't that a better way of addressing the serious health problems - including terrible asthma than having Fresh Direct's trucks clog S. Bronx roadways on their way to the Upper West Side to deliver a bag of groceries?

Ramon and Jen in their comments cover the fallacy of the need to deliver locally perfectly. I just want to add that we want a waterfront park and development that would make use of this land without damaging our health with more diesel and particulate pollution. It's possible in DUMBO and in the West Village. Why not here? Let Fresh Direct expand in Queens on their own dime and keep those htey've employed in that neighborhood.

Oh, and my original challenge re. numbers and sources: the author should look at figures in challenges to the deal submitted to the 'hearing' held by the EDC (after the deal was already announced by Ruben Diaz, Bloomberg, and Cuomo). They were the result of analysis by Charles Komanoff Director of the Carbon Tax Center, and a transportation advocate, provided as testimony on February 9th, 2012. He found that the costs to other New Yorkers for the relocation and expansion caused by Fresh Direct truck traffic ALONE will be $52,000 a day or $19 million a year. WITHOUT CONSIDERING ANY OF THE OTHER COSTS to New Yorkers, the subsidies combined with the traffic costs will erase the ostensible benefits heralded by WNYC writer's unidentified source within 10 years.

Feb. 29 2012 06:44 PM
Gigi from Mott Haven

It is a rotten deal for the South Bronx. All that free money for the possibilty of some low paying job creation and the certainty of more pollution, no access to the public waterfront and no fresh vegetables/fruit for the community that has a real need for it.

Feb. 27 2012 01:51 PM
Ramon from Port Morris

The so called electric vehicles would be purchased with a grant from the government, ie our money. $10 million grant to buy them. This gives them an unfair advantage, what about my small food delivery fleet? I get fines and stickers and they get proposed $10 million? Seems corrupt. Also, electric vehicles run clean in the Upper East Side, while the refueling and coal electricity is produced and emitted in the Bronx

Feb. 27 2012 08:14 AM
Jen from Mott Haven

Bronx does NOT want Fresh Direct. They can expand where they are in Long Island City instead. Why give them $130 million in cash and breaks?
We do not want more truck pollution. This FD is a service for rich people.
The waterfront is a major issue too. One man has a 99 year lease for 100 acres and PAYS NO RENT.
The Bronx Boro President is criminally giving away our tax money!
Support existing local grocer's with that money.

Feb. 27 2012 08:10 AM
Keith C. from Queens

"I'm not trying to sound prejudiced, but the white people get the good stuff before the poor people do.”

Feb. 27 2012 08:03 AM
jerryreimer from ca

My friend was at a major store last week that would not give their Rewards coupon if you used a newspaper coupon for the item. They said it was their policy!!! i told her to check "Get Official Samples" to find samples

Feb. 27 2012 06:42 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


Latest Newscast




WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public


Supported by