Santorum, Romney, Gingrich Make Their Pitch at CPAC

Friday, February 10, 2012

Newt Gingrich addresses the 2012 Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, DC. (Getty)

On Friday Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney, and Newt Gingrich each addressed the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington, DC.

Rick Santorum, fresh off his triple victory in Tuesday's non-binding caucuses and primaries, took the stage first, and used his moment to take shots at the consistent front-runner Mitt Romney.

Some of Santorum's remarks were more thinly veiled than others.

"We will no longer abandon and apologize for the policies and principles that made this country great for a hollow victory in November," Santorum said, touting what he called his consistent conservative record: namely, opposing health care mandates in an era when his current opponents were favoring them.

"I know you, you know me," Santorum said. "That's important."

The implication there was for Republicans not to let Romney's perceived electability against Obama overshadow the blemishes in his conservative pedigree. And to remember that whole authenticity, flip-flopping thing that's dogged Romney from day one. Santorum raised the specter of voters in the general election taking cues from an unenthusiastic Republican base.

"Why would an undecided voter vote for a candidate of a party that the party's not excited about?" Santorum asked, incredulous.

Mitt Romney's conservative pedigree

Mitt Romney hardly talked about his opponents. His speech was all about assuaging the very concerns Rick Santorum had brought up that morning.

"I know conservatism because I have lived conservatism," Romney said. As governor of Massachusetts, he "did some of the very things conservatism is designed for."

At this point, Romney's pitch seems to be not even mentioning the health care mandate, or how he changed his mind on gay marriage, or any parts of his record that Republicans take issue with. He's purely focused on his accomplishments as governor that were in spite of having a Democratic legislature: claiming over 800 vetos, saying he kept Massachusetts from becoming "the Las Vegas of gay marriage," and the like.

"I served in government, but I didn't inhale," Romney said, earning laughs.

Toward the end of his speech, Romney tried to remind CPAC that he was the guy who'd "never worked a day in Washington," unlike the rest of the Republican field. "I don't have old scores to settle or decades of cloakroom deals I have to defend," he said, which sure sounds like it's directed at Newt Gingrich.

Newt Gingrich's lesson

Newt Gingrich gave what we've come to expect from the former Speaker: tons of information, delivered forcefully and with so much detail that by the time you're ready to evaluate what he's said about one thing, he's moved on to the next.

Sounding very much like a professor, Gingrich got perhaps the most energetic applause of the day.

"By the time Barack Obama lands in Chicago, we'll have repudiated 40 percent of his government," Gingrich said, slipping into that post-election reverie where he's already won the nomination and gone on to defeat Obama.

Gingrich offers the most specifics of the three candidates at CPAC today, for sure. He'll tell you all the laws he's going to repeal on day one of his administration—Sarbanes-Oxley, Dodd-Frank, the list goes on—and even what time they're going to the shredder. He'll explain the conservative theory that corporations will actually pay their taxes if the rates are lower. He'll remind you that he left office with an unemployment rate of 4.2 percent. And that his bold ideas often get him into hot water with his party, despite being at times the only truly conservative ones, in Gingrich's mind.

"We need to teach the Republican establishment a lesson," the historian concluded.


More in:

Comments [1]

Jay from Brooklyn

The conservative bloggers that were just on Leonard Lopate are the ones that do not understand our economic system. Insurance does take into account the costs of alternatives. If I have a car alarm on my car, I can get a reduced rate because I will be in less accidents. If I do not smoke, I can get cheaper medical insurance because I will require less medical care. Are these infringements on my personal liberty? Does that fact that my state (NY) requires an eye test infringe on my liberty to drive without corrective lenses. After all I feel I look better without them.

Also, what about the religious freedom of the women that work for a religious organization. Shouldn't they have the right to decide for themselves how they practice religion. The Catholic heirarchy supports extension of unemployment insurance and increased support of the poor. Where do the conservative guests stand on that issue?

Feb. 13 2012 10:55 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


About It's A Free Country ®

Archive of It's A Free Country articles and posts. Visit the It's A Free Country Home Page for lots more.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at


Supported by