Families Challenge School Rule for Vaccine-Exempt Kids

Wednesday, February 08, 2012

Hundreds of public school students get religious exemptions from compulsory vaccination requirements for school. However, there is a catch: if students are not vaccinated, the school can ask them to stay home, for an extended period, if a classmate comes down with chicken pox, measles or one of the other “vaccine-preventable diseases.” Two families from Queens are suing the city over that catch.

“Who’s this rule designed to protect, the non-immunized kid?” asked Patricia Finn, an attorney for the families. “The parents have already said, ‘Fine, put our child in school. We’ll take our chances with these mild childhood illnesses.’”

Finn is asking a federal judge in Brooklyn to overturn the city rule. The case is scheduled for late March, but Finn is going to court on Monday to ask for a temporary restraining order, so one of her clients can avoid a two-to three-week stint at home  — the second in the last two months.

Medical experts dispute that the illnesses in question — including chicken pox, measles, mumps and rubella — are mild. They can be, but they can also be life-threatening. They also say that vaccines aren’t 100 percent effective, and the presence of non-immunized children in the event of an outbreak can accelerate the spread of disease.

Finn argues that the application of the rule is arbitrary and capricious, because while the city Health Department, in theory, enforces the rule, in practice it falls to school principals. And some enforce it, Finn said, while others don’t.

“You have to balance the public health interest and the individual’s right to free exercise of religion,” Finn said. “This rule does not achieve that balance.”

The city declined to comment on the lawsuit, as it does all pending litigation.

In its policy published online, the Department of Education states unvaccinated children can be kept home, in the event of a disease outbreak “for at least one incubation period after the onset of the last case.” For example, according to the rule, “if a case of measles is diagnosed, students who have not received a measles vaccine will be excluded from school during the outbreak and for an additional 18 days after the onset of the last case in the school.”

Finn said if there is a series of such cases, unvaccinated kids can be forced to stay home for several weeks. It’s happened twice this year to two of her clients, and one of them had two such cases last year, as well.

Professor Marci Hamilton, from Yeshiva University’s Cardozo Law School, said the provision Finn is challenging is very common — and Hamilton, an expert on church-state conflicts, doesn’t know of other similar legal petitions. She said Finn will have a difficult case proving her clients’ constitutional rights have been violated. She said if students are at risk of becoming seriously ill, schools have an obligation to remove them from that risk, and that goes for students who are unvaccinated for both religious and medical reasons.

“When individuals choose to take actions that put their health at risk for religious reasons, they must bear the consequences of their decisions,” Hamilton said. “There is no constitutional right to make such decisions and then put schools in a position of being responsible for their health.”

The number of students getting religious exemptions from city schools has increased from 46 in 2005 to 208 in 2010, the most recent year for which figures were available.


More in:

Comments [4]

Jake Kitchingman from Leeds


Feb. 10 2012 07:29 AM
Jake Kitchingman from Leeds

I herd u liek vaksinashuns.

Feb. 10 2012 07:27 AM
C Moore from Massachusetts

As someone who had chicken pox TWICE despite having all the vaccinations recommended, and as someone who's body has failed time and again to make antibodies to the various vaccines she has received, I provide an excellent example of how excluding one person based upon religion yet including someone based upon being vaccinated is absolutely ridiculous. Someone with a stronger immune system who has not been vaccinated is a lesser threat than I with a weak immune system who had been vaccinated and in fact had previously had the disease. It's clearly discriminatory to prevent access to equal education based upon the exercise of religious beliefs. It's ridiculous when you take into consideration that we all have no idea as to whether or not any vaccine has resulted in antibodies in anyone!!!

Feb. 09 2012 03:13 PM
J.Lee from Bronx, NY

There seems to be some capricious rules when it comes to immunizations. I chose to immunize my son, however, because one of his shots was given a couple of days prior to his 1st birthday the DOE keeps insisting he takes the shot again. Meanwhile there is no medical indication that renders the shot ineffective. And while there's no medical reason to have my son take an extra dose of the shot, the computer system where this information is entered is set up not to accept the date so my son's immunizations appear as incomplete. A ridiculous reason to force me to give my son yet another dose of the immunization shot he's already received.

Feb. 09 2012 12:35 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


Latest Newscast




WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public


Supported by