Streams

Opinion: A Last Look at the Romney 'Slide' in New Hampshire

Monday, January 09, 2012 - 11:31 AM

Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney attends a Nashua Chamber of Commerce breakfast in Nashua, New Hampshire, January 9, 2012. (Getty)

Rick Santorum “won” the Iowa Caucuses by eight votes. We know he did because some votes were misreported on caucus night, and Romney did not get the biggest vote.

Who cares? I tried to get some of the media to talk about that here in New Hampshire, where I am covering the primary (and where I have a second home and spend a lot of time) and doing some research for my classes and book. “Iowa was yesterday,” one well-known reporter said.

Okay, then. Let's look at New Hampshire.

Poll—Friday January 6, 2012

Before the weekend, Texas Congressman Ron Paul was polling second in New Hampshire at 18 percent, trailing behind front-runner Mitt Romney, who has 42 percent of the vote, according to a Rasmussen Reports poll.

Full results:

  • Mitt Romney (42%)
  • Ron Paul (18%)
  • Rick Santorum (13%)
  • Jon Huntsman (12%)
  • Newt Gingrich (8%)
  • Rick Perry (1%)

New Poll—Sunday, January 8, 2012

  • Mitt Romney (35%)
  • Ron Paul (20%)
  • Jon Huntsman (11%)
  • Newt Gingrich (9%)
  • Rick Santorum (8%)
  • Rick Perry (1%)

What will New Hampshire voters do? The tracking poll shows Romney sliding. Is this the Iowa roller coaster all over again? If Romney does not get 40 percent, will that be considered a loss, and the winner whoever comes in a (strong) second? After all, New Hampshire is where Romney is the homeboy.

Mitt Romney — Earn It: Bedford, NH

Ah, but all the polls suggest that Romney will ultimately win anyway. One of my New Hampshire Republican friends said today, “This has the feel of an inevitable and painful surgery, even while taking some medication in the meantime that’s supposed to cure the ill and make surgery unnecessary!”

Wow! I guess then maybe Romney is “the chosen one,” and not Ron Paul, who has been using that biblical reference in his advertisements.

I hate being an analyst! These voters in polls are not behaving themselves and being consistent. It’s not fair to us. They can’t keep changing their minds and driving us crazy guessing what surprise the next poll will have.

On the other hand, it’s very revealing of the division and uncertainty in the GOP as to who likely voters think will best represent them and their party. It really is a remarkable political season.

Romney will be in big doo doo when he has to make public his income tax returns—if the media will ever actually ask for them. Actually, South Carolina will be an interesting contest as the first Southern primary where Newt Gingrich is presumably the local “homeboy.”

Newt Gingrich — Bold, Conservative Leadership

So then the question is whether Ron Paul supporters will vote for any other GOP candidate if theirs drops out of the race—will they turn out for Mitt Romney or just stay at home? Maybe they'll still write-in Ron Paul.

Stay tuned.

Tags:

More in:

News, weather, Radiolab, Brian Lehrer and more.
Get the best of WNYC in your inbox, every morning.

Comments [3]

Jack Jackson from Central New Jersey

19 Sep 2012 - 48 days 'til the election. The Romney/Ryan campaign is off the rails again with their hands full of dealing with things the candidate said. The consensus opinion is that Mr Romney's campaign is inept...and if the campaign is inept, what can you expect from his governance.

Huntsman or Pawlenty would have done a far better job but the Party's irrational Obama hatred (IOH) and Mitt's money kept that from happening.

Sep. 19 2012 10:06 AM
Ed Pressman from Eastchester, NY

When Republican commentators argue that the European model doesn't work, you never challenge the facts of that position. There are multiple examples of social democracies that are doing quite well. Our neighbor to the north is the closest, but clearly far from the only, model. Capitalism is their economic system, just not the American brand. Why doesn't anybody ask these people to define what they mean by Socialism?

Jan. 11 2012 08:18 AM
Hank from ny

I wasn't aware about the discrepancy in the Iowa vote. Makes a person wonder if/when reporters spit out phrases that a candidate has never won both iowa and new hampshire until now (assuming Mitt wins) what other analytical reporting they are simply mailing in.

Jan. 10 2012 04:11 PM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Sponsored

About It's A Free Blog

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a blog, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at revsonfoundation.org.

Feeds

Supported by