Mistrial Declared in Seabrook Corruption Case

Friday, December 09, 2011

A federal judge has declared a mistrial in the case of a New York City Council member accused of misdirecting hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer money meant for community projects.

U.S. District Judge Robert Patterson let the jury quit Friday afternoon after it sent him the latest of several notes saying it couldn't decide on the guilt or innocence of 60-year-old Democrat Larry Seabrook.

U.S. attorney Preet Bharara said he intends to retry the case.

The jury sent a note to the judge late Thursday that said after a full week of deliberations they remained deadlocked on all 12 counts. The jurors also told the court that "due to economic hardship" to themselves and their employers they could not continue deliberations into a second week on Monday.

"While the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict in the trial of Councilman Seabrook," he said in a statement, "we fully intend to retry the case and prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Councilman criminally exploited his official position in order to enrich his friends, his family, and himself."

Patterson sent the jury a note Friday explaining they did not have to come to a consensus on all the counts but could reach a verdict on just one. That note was responded to with yet another note declaring their deadlocked status.

With the Associated Press


More in:

News, weather, Radiolab, Brian Lehrer and more.
Get the best of WNYC in your inbox, every morning.

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.


Latest Newscast




WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public


Supported by