Photo credit: @julesdwit.
A not-for-profit media organization supported by people like you.
One take a day on the deficit talks until the Thanksgiving deadline.
With the deficit super committee defense budget "trigger" on the line, Travis Sharp, Bacevich Fellow at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), looks at what the funding priorities are for the US military.
The current federal budget has roughly $2.5T in tax revenues, $0.9T in military spending, and $2.9T in civilian spending (CBO numbers). Three points: (1) Talk of balancing the budget or meaningful deficit reduction w/o raising taxes and/or w/o cutting military budget appears to be a mathematical fantasy at this point. (2) Given that about 1/4 of federal spending goes to the military and more than 1/3 of all federal govt. employees belong to the military, any talk of small govt. and big military is hypocrisy. (3) Let's say the Republican dream comes true and we balance the budget by cutting only the civilian spending to $1.6T. So now military is an even bigger fraction of the federal govt. How long can they hide the hypocrisy?
Its time to reduce the military-industrial complex.Eisenhower saw it coming and warned us.This was a general speaking.Our taxes can and should be spent more wisely for the benefit of all.
I really appreciate this coverage, and would like to suggest a couple of discussions, on blogs that cover the defense industry, of the untruths and fear mongering behind much of Sec'y. Panetta's recent statements:http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/11/defense-cut-paranoia/?pid=951&pageid=63796 andhttp://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/11/16/secdefs-fleet-warning-have-already-come-true/
How much would eliminating military bands save? Is that a possibility?
All veteran benefits should be off the table. I'm the last to support war and the support of war but that people who believe they are doing something to "keep us safe" and put their lives in danger and threat of loss of life for any length of time should not have any of their benefits cut.
If the US cuts back on its commitments to treaties, what will happen is countries who depended on us for backup will go nuclear. Less US overseas capabilities, means more countries overseas, such as Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, perhaps Saudi Arabia, etc., going nuclear. More nuclear armed countries will be the result of huge reductions in American overseas capabilities.
Ooops, I meant DOD in my previous post.
And the mercenary armies we have, where does the funding for them come from? Is it even from the DOF or is that yet another budget which goes to defense in the end!
"do less with less"?! In my job, I have seen more than half of the people in my department laid off since 5 years ago. I do more with less every day, just as everyone else in business does these days. I can't believe that the DOD can't handle a 10% budget cut. Nuclear submarines? We really still need those to launch missiles at all of the other countries looking to start a war with the worlds greatest military power? Right.
I'm a little conflicted about the Australian thing. On the one hand, we want to spend less on the military. But on the other hand, the Australian thing would mean that troops that might otherwise have been laid off will have jobs. And they won't be at war. So they'll be working. And isn't jobs what we want? Many of our troops are minorities who are at a disadvantage for getting jobs in the civilian world, which is why they joined the military in the first place. So, on that basis, I'm not against Obama sending troops to a base in Australia.
Aren't we spending more on defense than all other countries in the world, combined? It drives me crazy to hear politicians talking about cutting "non-defense" spending, as if we haven't figured out the huge amount of our tax dollars, fully 20%, that go toward this machine. If we were to cut this budget in half, we'd still be ahead of any other country, and we could easily re-build our infrastructure, creating many jobs, fund vital research, and fund education to help ensure that our kids are fully prepared for the future. The choice is ours. Isn't it?
This failure of democracy can only be solved by the likes of darth sidious
Email addresses are required but never displayed.
Brian Lehrer leads the conversation about what matters most now in local and national politics, our own communities and our lives.
Subscribe on iTunes
Brian Lehrer Weekend: Gay Talese; Nobel Peace Prize Winner Leymah Gbowee; Anne Lamott
WNYC 93.9 FM and AM 820 are New York's flagship public radio
stations, broadcasting the finest programs from NPR and PRI, as well as a wide range of award-winning local
programming. WNYC is a division of
New York Public Radio.