Streams

Politics This Week: Questions About Christie and the Government Shutdown Showdown

Monday, September 26, 2011

Welcome to Politics Bites, where every afternoon at It's A Free Country, we bring you the unmissable quotes from the morning's political conversations on WNYC. Today on the Brian Lehrer Show, Karen Tumulty, national political correspondent for The Washington Post, and New York Times national correspondent Jackie Calmes discussed the latest national political news.

Renewed Christie speculation

Over and over again, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has rejected the idea of running for president in 2012; earlier this year, he told CNN's Piers Morgan that he was "100 percent certain" he would not seek the Republican nomination.

But that hasn't dampened the hopes of many Republican voters who would still like to see Christie join the race. Craving an alternative to the current field (even enthusiasm about Rick Perry has waned), the Right has Christie on a very short list of dream candidates. Given that it's so late in the game, and that there are so many hats in the ring, Jackie Calmes said it was unusual for a party to clamor for yet another option.

It just underscores how dissatisfied Republicans are with their field as it stands...I see this every four years it seems—the party that's trying to take back the White House is unhappy with their candidates—but this time it's really striking.

Karen Tumulty said that all this fretting reflects how badly Republicans want to beat Obama more than it reflects the weakness of the candidates.

It's not a field that on paper looks all that weak; but Republicans feel as though there's this opportunity here to beat a weakened incumbent president, and they're just scared they're going to blow it.

The next government shutdown

Perhaps another shutdown showdown isn't terribly surprising, but that it's happening over disaster relief funds has raised some eyebrows. Recent natural disasters like the Joplin tornadoes and Hurricane Irene have increased demand for emergency money, demand that Republicans want filled if and only if the money comes from cutting spending elsewhere.

The Republican-controlled House of Representatives sent a bill to the Senate that took $1.5 billion from investment in alternative energy in order to fund relief efforts. The Democrat-controlled Senate quickly rejected the bill, hoping to pay for relief without dipping into other programs. Karen Tumulty said this wasn't going to help anyone's opinion of Congress.

The only thing I can figure is that Congress is trying to figure out whether there's actually a way to drive its approval rating into the single digits...This is exactly the reason that people like Bill McInturff, the Republican pollster, are warning these guys: You have no sense of how outraged the public is when they see these kinds of games.

Jackie Calmes said that the Democrats have the more convincing argument of the two parties: Senator Mark Warner has said that it makes no sense to withhold emergency relief funds (something that's never been done before) when for the last decade we've borrowed freely to pay for infrastructure projects in the Middle East.

We've for 10, 11 years been borrowing money for our operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and building roads and schools, etc., and yet we'll have a confrontation over aid to our own cities and towns that were so hurt by these hurricanes and tornadoes? It's inexplicable.

Guests:

Jackie Calmes and Karen Tumulty

Tags:

More in:

Comments [10]

asdf

you guys are dismissing this issue as congress being idiots.

But from the tea party perspective, the government bailing out people with tax dollars is at the core of their platform.

Sep. 26 2011 10:36 AM
Jack Jackson from Central New Jersey

I put no faith in the 'born again' deficit hawks. They seem to get religion only when the other party is in power. Let's have action to recover from the recession and then draw down the deficit spending as it becomes clear that the economy is headed in the right direction.

Sep. 26 2011 10:36 AM
Rick from connecticut coast

Isn't it obvious that the Tea Party Republicans are trying to jack up unemployment to 13 -14% so they can sweep the elections next year?

Sep. 26 2011 10:36 AM
john from office

Jon Huntsman, is the best from the feild, but because he a rational, he is ignored.

Sep. 26 2011 10:34 AM
Edw. from NYC

With all the anit-bully campaigns happenning for kids, why would anyone want a grown-up playground bully like Chris Christie for President?

Sep. 26 2011 10:33 AM
Kathleen McGoldrick

Christie's "word" that he is not going to run for president is not worth much. He also gave his "word" in print when he was running for governor that "nothing would change" regarding the pensions of public school teachers when he became governor. We can see how much that held up from the events of the past year...

Sep. 26 2011 10:32 AM
Fuva from Harlemworld

The "African-American" angle your guest alluded to is interesting, particularly because there are many who think it's O's blackness that has accounted for his relative meekness and failure to impement the requisite economic politicies; that he has held back in the face of often incoherent resistance, for fear of coming on as too "strong of a black man" and, in so doing, not doing enough to fix this mess..."Post-racial", huh?

Sep. 26 2011 10:30 AM
Real Republican

If Chris Christie:

1. Combined towns in NJ in order to slash statewide administrative costs

2. Greenlighted that tunnel to raise property value and reduce associated transport costs

I'd back him to the hilt. Until then I find him a man with the appearance he deserves and nothing else.

Sep. 26 2011 10:30 AM
Susan from Morningside Hts.

Re the Wall Street Protest -- you're missing that parents and teachers who hate the corporate/privatizing "Ed Reform" movement helped spearhead this protest!

Sep. 26 2011 10:29 AM
Joshua Jake Levine

So the Republicans are saying that Americans can only pay for losses caused by climate-change-related disasters, with money budgeted to reduce mans' contribution to climate change, via the promotion of carbon-neutral energies.

While I'm not sure what moral lodestar has driven humans into this absurd conundrum. But I do know that if there is a G-d, He is not amused.

Sep. 26 2011 10:21 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Sponsored

About It's A Free Country ®

Archive of It's A Free Country articles and posts. Visit the It's A Free Country Home Page for lots more.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at revsonfoundation.org.

Feeds

Supported by