Streams

Next for Obama: Focus on Infrastructure

Thursday, September 01, 2011

 

Welcome to Politics Bites, where every afternoon at It's A Free Country, we bring you the unmissable quotes from the morning's political conversations on WNYC. Today on the Brian Lehrer Show, Politico.com's Senior Politics reporter Ben Smith, and director of America 2050 Petra Todorovich discuss the the transportation bills the president is urging Congress to pass, their impact on the NYC area, and a new initiative to develop an infrastructure and growth strategy for the United States.

President Obama will not be giving his jobs speech at the same time as the Republican presidential debate, but will instead compete with the opening night of NFL football.

Yesterday the president gave a speech about transportation infrastructure, calling on Congress not to play politics with people’s livelihoods. Yet media coverage focused more on the scheduling snafu than on yesterday’s message, and lost in the hubbub was information about some new transportation bills that could have major repercussions for the New York area. 

The president sited the United States decline in infrastructure in his speech, saying the nation “should not just be playing catch-up or patch-up, we should be leading the world.” President Obama said interest rates are low and construction workers are unemployed, creating a perfect opportunity for infrastructure investment.

Petra Todorovich is with the Regional Planning Association. She thinks the resident really didn’t break any new ground with his talk.

This is the president saying to Congress, c’mon guys, get your act together. Don’t do what you did on the debt ceiling with the transportation bill.

The president referred to two versions of the bill—one from the House, one from the Senate. Todorovich says the two are not equal

The House-proposed bill would cost about $230 billion over six years. It takes existing revenue coming into the transportation trust fund and sends it back out to the states.

It’s really a very drastic cut from what President Obama had originally proposed, which was a bill [of] about $550 billion dollars over six years. And it’s a thirty percent cut annually over what the federal government currently spends on transportation funding.

The Senate bill is a two-year bill that would cost about $109 billion. Todorovich said that spending the same amount over two years still leaves the same problems, and the issue would just rise again in two years. The impact to the New York region, however, would be much less, as funding levels would at least stay about the same.

The Tri-State Transportation Campaign did an analysis of what a thirty percent cut might mean to New Jersey, New York and Connecticut. They found that 18,000 jobs would be lost in New Jersey as a result of the cuts. In New York the cut would be larger, $7.2 billion over six years, or 45,000 jobs in the first year alone. In Connecticut the estimated loss would be nine thousand jobs.

A lot of projects that we’ve been hoping for, that keep the subway system and the commuter rail in good repair, would be canceled or delayed.

Ben Smith said the president—who gave a jobs address yesterday and will give a jobs address next week—is being redundant to drive across the message.

He wants to talk about jobs whenever he is talking about anything. He wants to be a jobs president… I think he’s trying to set the stage for what he hopes will be a very big, very high-impact speech.

Smith said part of what the president was doing was trying to head off any replay of the debt ceiling showdown.

The Highway Trust Fund renewal is one of those things where a month ago when we were calling both White House officials and people on the hill they said of course it will get renewed, it always gets renewed. And it’s just another mark of how things that used to be routine are always now on the verge of total crisis and meltdown.

The federal gas tax is also set to expire at the end of September. It costs 18.4 cents per gallon—a flat amount that has not changed in many years. The tax has not kept up with inflation, and as people use more gas efficient cars and therefore less gas, it has declined further as a source of revenue. Todorovich said the routine thing that Congress does is to renew it.

To let it lapse would be disaster. There would be no money for anybody’s highway departments across the country. But given the political brinkmanship that’s been going on in Congress these day, they could possibly consider not renewing the gas tax, and that would be chaos.

Todorovich has concerns that the tax might be used as a bargaining chip.

That’s the kind of politics we’re seeing play out right now, which is so unfortunate because these are fundamental issues that underpin our economy and we just need to maintain our infrastructure in a state of good repair at a bare minimum.

Smith said the scheduling snafu might have just been a simple accident.

Honestly, in politics it’s hard to overestimate how incompetent people are… you can't totally write off the possibility in politics that people were just bumbling, because often, people are, and it gets attributed to some kind of devious intention. On the other hand it sort of looks like they were trying to upstage the republicans, to contrast this president looking for solutions, with this seven dwarves screaming at each other about far-out policy solutions.

House Speaker Boehner is said to have privately agreed to the original scheduling of the speech, but publicly he objected when other Republicans were angered by the timing.  Smith said Boehner likely didn’t agree, but also didn’t object.  

I think Boehner will likely look to a lot of people like a partisan jerk who will do anything to do the president harm, but Boehner’s not running nationally next year, the House Republicans aren’t running nationally next year, and frankly they do want to stop the president at every front.

Smith isn’t sure why the Republicans didn’t simply shift their debate an hour later and spend that time finding fault with his statements, but he thinks it might signal a difference between Congressional Republicans and Republican candidates for president.

I think the Congressional Republicans want to be the ones on television responding to Barack Obama. They don’t want these presidential candidates to be the ones stealing the show. So I think the Republican party is not a united force.

Guests:

Ben Smith and Petra Todorovich

Tags:

More in:

News, weather, Radiolab, Brian Lehrer and more.
Get the best of WNYC in your inbox, every morning.

Comments [17]

ZERO Out ALL Spending in Tea Party Districts from A starting point for negotiation.

ZERO Out ALL Spending in Tea Party Congressional Districts As a Starting Point
for Negotiations.

Tea Partiers in Congress need to be shown that they also can hurt if they continue to hold the country hostage.

Pres. Obama needs to show that he can
FIGHT and will fight if his opponents continue to step on him and hold America's
interests hostage.

Do NOT do so by starting with a conservative Republican proposal and
then going further and further Right.

Do so by proposing something VERY extreme to the Left and SPECIFICALLY damaging to obstinant Tea Partiers.
THEN they will learn to be more reasonable
and come to the negotiation table in earnest rather than laughing at Obama and the Democrats' servile appeasement.

Stand up and fight, Make your opponents realize that they will ALSO hurt - BADLY.
It's through strength that you can get peace. It's by countering extreme right wingnut proposals with other extremes that one can shift the negotiation back to the TRUE center and preserve America.

Mr. President, Democrats on the
Super-committee, START BY PROPOSING BUDGET CUTS THAT ZERO OUT ALL SPENDING IN TEA PARTY DISTRICTS AND ON THINGS THAT TEA PARTIERS CARE ABOUT -
THEN Negotiate. If you still lose, at least
you won't look spineless.

Sep. 01 2011 01:53 PM

sorry.

It's exhausting.

Sep. 01 2011 10:35 AM

I'm with Robert and jk!!

SICK OF HEARING ABOUT HIM/IT!

Sep. 01 2011 10:32 AM

@Robert from NYC

My sentiments, exactly!!!

Sep. 01 2011 10:30 AM
DarkSymbolist from NYC!

@Robert

Alas, I agree...I am sick of Obama caving in on EVERYTHING.

But an even worse nightmare would be one of these horrible extremist proto-fascist Repiglicans winning the Presidency (giving the extreme right control of all three branches of government).

So, not voting is basically giving the proto-fascists a victory. Therefore, I will begrudgingly vote for Obama again because there will be no other Dem candidate and third party candidates can't win

Very depressing

Sep. 01 2011 10:29 AM

really...??? REALLY?!?!

This is BO's idea of hardball politics???

A scheduling snafu??

ARE YOU KIDDING???

GROW A PAIR!!!

Sep. 01 2011 10:29 AM
Mary Madsen from Brooklyn

The president is approaching things all wrong.
Republicans hate all taxes except the payroll tax which the president wants to extend. He needs to say he wants to end taxes, medicaid, food stamps, the EPA. If he says up the Republicans say down. They would be forced to choose between becoming liberals or agreeing with the president.

Sep. 01 2011 10:28 AM

AHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!

The house is ON FIRE!!!

Does this scheduling "thing" really matter???!!!

Who the hell cares??

Sep. 01 2011 10:25 AM
Bob from Pelham NY

Your guest is overlooking the fact that Congress is only in session two days next week (after a month off), so the President only had a choice between Wednesday and Thursday (against NFL opening game).

Sep. 01 2011 10:24 AM

"... and the President backed down, again."???

What...???

Our President??

Sep. 01 2011 10:24 AM
Sophie from Poughkeepsie, NY

"Get in their face?"

The president doesn't get into anyone's face.

Now he's going up against the NFL...good luck!

Sep. 01 2011 10:22 AM
jk

@Robert from NYC

Bravo, Robert. Very well said. Obama is a mealy mouthed milquetoast. He's an absolute disgrace and I wish someone in the Democratic Party could defeat him for the nomination. I reluctantly voted for him in 2008 and he's lived down to all my expecations of him. He's nothing but a preening, pompous windbag who gives lip service to helping the middle class, but in reality is a tool of Wall Street.

Sep. 01 2011 10:18 AM
Bobby G from East Village

Sounds like it's time to turn the Republican language manipulation machine on themselves and start labeling their policies as,"job killing."

Sep. 01 2011 10:16 AM
Andrew from Brooklyn

How will the Second Avenue Subway line be affected in both bills? Is there a possiblity that it will be put on hold once again?

Sep. 01 2011 10:14 AM
Sophie from Poughkeepsie, NY

@Robert from NYC

Unfortunately, so true. Although, I shudder to think what state we'd be in had McCain/Palin gotten in.

It seems like when Boehner says "no", Obama say "okay, what would you like me to do?"...

a real drag.

Sep. 01 2011 10:13 AM
Amy from Manhattan

On the scheduling of the speech: So, it's gridlock vs. gridiron?

Sep. 01 2011 10:12 AM
Robert from NYC

Obama is a coward he is a lackey to the republicans and he should NOT be allowed a second term. He has lost my vote and altho I have NO intention to vote for a republican I will not vote for Obama either. I ask all those fed up with Obama to either get a third candidate or not vote. It's time to be heard. He has kowtowed to the republicans at every turn and has done nothing of relevance for the majority of those of us who had hope for change and voted for him in 2008. It's time he bow out and let someone else with a backbone and gumption run against the republican comedy team in 2012. Please get out of the White House.

Sep. 01 2011 10:05 AM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Sponsored

About It's A Free Country ®

Archive of It's A Free Country articles and posts. Visit the It's A Free Country Home Page for lots more.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at revsonfoundation.org.

Feeds

Supported by