Streams

Opinion: Obama's Poorly Timed Fundraiser

Thursday, August 11, 2011 - 08:06 AM

President Barack Obama President Barack Obama (jmtimages/flickr)

As the Fed predicts two more years of a sluggish economy, President Obama's $76,000-per-couple fundraiser shows that his campaign treasury isn't suffering.

As regular Americans face sustained unemployment, Anna Wintour, Gwyneth Paltrow and Quentin Tarantino - all expected to attend the event - are doing OK. As the debt and deficit debates demand deep cuts into services that support working families, there is no reduction in how much our politicians can - and must - raise to be competitive.

Call it bad timing. It's no secret that our presidential candidates need to raise extraordinary amounts of money, so the president isn't any more to hypocritical to rake in cash during an austerity craze than fellow candidate Mitt Romney who, taking advantage of the Citizens United reality, had received one million dollars from a secret donor (since revealed to be a Bain executive). In Obama's defense, everyone is doing it.

Which might make it necessary - but doesn't make it right.

Obama's poorly timed fundraiser is worse than just bad optics. It's at the root of bad policy. It's a reminder of what our leaders need to do to get elected. When you see from whom they get support, it's no surprise who their decisions support. It's no surprise that banks are getting bailed out while American homeowners are under water, that oil companies keep getting subsidies while working Americans see higher prices at the gas pump and why millionaires get tax cuts and our shared infrastructure bears the cost.

The way campaigns are financed is legalized bribery (and, at times, legalized extortion). We all know it, which is why we can rationalize the president taking more money from each supporter who wants to dine with him than many of the voters who put him in office make in a year.

But sometimes you wish we'd all be a little less rational about it, as MSNBC host Dylan Ratigan was in his Howard Beale moment on his show the other day.

He declared that all of Congress - both parties - were in on a systemic racket, and that the hot pursuit of campaign cash was the major corrupting influence on our country. Then, when asked what the president could do with it, he suggested Obama stand up and declare that since Congress was bought-and-sold by big donors, he was going to push past Congress and work directly with the American people.

It's a fun, fiery freak-out, but it's sadly removed from reality - because Obama can't accuse Congress of being corrupted any more than Romney could accuse Obama or Rick Perry could accuse Romney. They are all in the same game, all playing by the same rules. It may seem hypocritical to hold high-end fundraisers while the economy is suffering; but it would be truly hypocritical to accuse any other politician of being worse than you because of the money they raised. More likely, they are just better at the game.

Maybe there would be ways for the President to change the politics around his fundraising. He could only accept money from super rich donors who sign the "Patriotic Millionaires" letter in support of progressive taxation. He could refuse money from industries that give bonuses with government bail-out cash. He could tell his funders to put the billion dollars he intends to spend directly into hiring workers - creating 20,000 decent-wage jobs…a nd maybe doing more to help his campaign than airing TV ads will.

But until we see real campaign finance reform, dinner at Harvey Weinstein is how even the best politicians get their chance to be heard, even as it decreases the chance that we'll like what we're hearing.

Justin Krebs is a political organizer and writer based in New York City. He is the founder of Living Liberally, a nationwide network of 250 local clubs that create social events around progressive politics, and author of "538 Ways to Live, Work and Play Like a Liberal."

Tags:

More in:

News, weather, Radiolab, Brian Lehrer and more.
Get the best of WNYC in your inbox, every morning.

Comments [9]

Gabriel from New York

Krebs fails to recognize that the majority of Obama's campaign funds come from individual donations UNDER $200. Call it grassroots, call it what you like, but Obama's fundraising from wealthy individuals is diminutive when compared to the widespread support he receives from everyday citizens. Unlike Romney, he's not receiving millions from corporations and private donors (i.e. Bain CEOs). In context, $36,000 a person is a very small donation. A fundraiser like this is more about people being able to show their support for the president and his re-election. Clearly you're just producing sensationalist blogging. Tooting your own horn, and coming off flat.

Aug. 02 2012 12:43 PM
Todd Eggers from Minneapolis, MN. USA

I have one thing to say to the greed and arrogance in our country, President OBAMA will be our President until January 2017, when his second term is up.

Oh one more thing, I noticed you tried to trademark the phrase, " It's a free country." What is next, will you try to trademark our Stars and Stripes for your own benefit? You can't trademark general phrases like this for your own interests. Sorry!

Good day!

Aug. 16 2011 07:48 AM
Jack of Corona from Qeens, NY

Since we, the American society, have mandated money to be the blood of our political system, I cannot blame any politician for getting these mandatory life transfusion whenever and wherever possible. To get away from this obscene system and the corruption to which it leads, let’s change our system.

Aug. 11 2011 08:57 PM
Jack of Corona from Qeens, NY

Since we, the American society, have mandated money to be the blood of our political system, I cannot blame any politician for getting these mandatory life transfusion whenever and wherever possible. To get away from this obscene system and the corruption to which it leads, let’s change our system.

Aug. 11 2011 08:56 PM
Jack of Corona

Since we, the American society, have mandated money to be the blood of our political system, I cannot blame any politician for getting these mandatory life transfusion whenever and wherever possible. To get away from this obscene system and the corruption to which it leads, let’s change our system.

Aug. 11 2011 08:55 PM
Jack of Corona

Since we, the American society, have mandated money to be the blood of our political system, I cannot blame any politician for getting these mandatory life transfusion whenever and wherever possible. To get away from this obscene system and the corruption to which it leads, let’s change our system.

Aug. 11 2011 08:54 PM
Who owns the President ? from the best government money can buy.


Who owns the President ?

Who owns Congress ?

Why - it's the people who bought and paid for them.

So if you wonder why noone has gotten tough on banks, or on CEOs,

So if you wonder why pain falls on the middle class and poor and the wealthy get more government largess,

So if you wonder why billionaires pay lower tax rates than their secretaries, and why we refuse to increase taxes on them while cutting medical care for the poor, elderly and desperately sick,

So if you wonder why all the nation's growth and wealth is being concentrated at the top even though this helps cause our economic decline,

well, you have your answer.

How can the President or the Congress do what needs to be done, when they are going cap-in-hand three times a week, begging for handouts from the very bandits who stole our country and our nation's future ?

They can't.

It seems we have the best government money can buy.

This is a very sad time for America.

Aug. 11 2011 08:47 PM
Jacob Somers from Brooklyn

Blah, blah, blah. Politicians need to raise money, lots of it, even when the economy is in the tank. You're making nothing into an issue.

And you think campaign money should be invested in putting people to work instead of campaigning? Is that even legal?

Aug. 11 2011 05:10 PM
Nichelle from Crown Heights

Obama's missteps have led people to compare him to David Dinkins.
http://loop21.com/content/barack-obama-new-david-dinkins

Aug. 11 2011 09:44 AM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Sponsored

About It's A Free Blog

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a blog, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at revsonfoundation.org.

Feeds

Supported by