Bloomberg's Anti-Poverty Record: Right or Wrong?

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Welcome to Politics Bites, where every afternoon at It's A Free Country, we bring you the unmissable quotes from the morning's political conversations on WNYC. Today on the Brian Lehrer Show, Glenn Pasanen, public finance columnist for Gotham Gazette, talked about Mayor Bloomberg's anti-poverty policies, and Daniel Massey, reporter for Crain's New York Business, discussed his article on "The Blossoming Bronx." 

A day after the head of the Administration for Children's Services called it quits, Glenn Pasanen criticized Mayor Bloomberg's approach to fighting poverty as "unreal." He argued that the Mayor has consistently cut funding from city's anti-poverty programs and agencies while trying to make his mark with small privately funded pilot programs that show limited success. Poverty in the city has remained steady, at about 20 percent of the population, with one percent living in deep poverty, even as the city has added millionaires and billionaires.

Bloomberg has said that taxpayer money should not be spent on unproven experiments, but private money is OK. Some of his touted anti-poverty measures involve directly giving incentives to poor families, for example, paying parents if their children achieve better attendance records. Pasanen considers the Mayor's approach evident of a free-market analysis, and he doesn't buy it:

That's to say the problem is not with institutions, with the local economy, the problem is with the individual family, and if you can just incentivize the family, whether it's a high school kid or a mother and father, then that will solve the problem.

One the other hand, Daniel Massey thinks that the Bloomberg administration deserves some credit for the blossoming of the Bronx, the city's poorest borough, over the last 10 years. In the last decade the Bronx has seen an influx of 52,000 people, higher wages, job growth, and become a magnet for immigrants. Massey said the city's investment in 35,000 new units of affordable housing has directly led to economic development:

Once you have the people coming back you're starting to see the demand, and while their income may be lower than in the rest of the city, they have to shop and you have a new million square foot mall near Yankee stadium, you have supermarket that are being added on Webster Avenue, you have the first significant commercial development in the Bronx, the city's developing four different sites now.

It's not all rosy in the Bronx, of course, because despite the rise in personal income, it's still 71 percent lower than the city average. And if the poverty rate held steady in the city overall, the poor may have just shifted geographically. But to take a step back, it's remarkable the city's poverty rate didn't increase during the recession. Could New York be doing something right?


Daniel Massey and Glenn Pasanen


More in:

Comments [5]

Lee Stringer

Just a word about New York's poverty numbers: the Welfare 'reforms' of the past couple of decades have been so effective in debarring millions of people from qualifying, that it is perilous to conclude exactly what the official numbers mean. There is the very real possiblity that we have an emerginbg new underclass: The Invisible Poor.

Apr. 18 2014 12:06 PM
CBR from Anywhere but Here

Bloomberg does have an "anti-poverty" campaign - its the attempt to force low income people out of the city via lack of jobs, lack of affordable housing and a reduction of services. This "anti-poverty" campaign is working very well.

Jul. 27 2011 11:20 AM
Gregg from Manhattan

I tried to sign up for food stamps. Did the online application. Took off from my part time job to accept the phone call from them. Big thunderstorm and my phone went dead. Tried calling them back when my service was restored, couldn't leave a mssg, and no one ever picked up the phone. Got a letter saying I was denied because I didn't answer the phone at the assigned time. I could petition for a judgement. Still using my cc to buy food. Game over.

Jul. 27 2011 10:42 AM
john from office

These callers are the reason this city and nation are in trouble. Looking for a handout instead of self sufficency

Jul. 27 2011 10:35 AM
need to be anonymous on this from Manhattan

I know someone who works for ACS who said that at least 1 child in a family the agency works with dies each month because they don't have enough resources, and that the press/media doesn't cover them unless the death is sensational in some way, and is much less likely to report it if it happens in one of the outer boroughs than if it happens in Manhattan. Can one of your guests from the press comment on this and how it might be changed?

Jul. 27 2011 10:29 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


About It's A Free Country ®

Archive of It's A Free Country articles and posts. Visit the It's A Free Country Home Page for lots more.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at


Supported by