Gay Marriage in NYS: Who are the Republican Targets?

Friday, May 06, 2011

New Yorkers United for Marriage, the gay rights advocacy supergroup that formed last month to fight for marriage equality legislation in the state, has identified at least 12 Republican state senators that they're trying to turn into "yes" votes. (The State Assembly has never had trouble passing a gay marriage bill; still safely held by Democrats, consensus is that garnering votes in that chamber is a non-issue.) In the Senate, they'll need every single Democrat and as many members of the GOP as they can muster if a bill has any chance of surviving; similar efforts died on the Senate floor in 2007 and again in 2009, with every Republican voting against it.

Here's a quick look at four senators on the list, and why they're there.

Mark Grisanti

Grisanti is on record as being "unalterably opposed to gay marriage"...which made him the perfect target for one Lady Gaga. At a March concert in Buffalo, Grisanti's senatorial stomping ground, the singer called him out for his opposition to a same sex marriage bill. Gaga gave out his email address to fans at the show; later, her Twitter account echoed the call to arms.

Having the ultra-high profile Lady Gaga on your case is kind of hard to ignore, and there's some evidence Grisanti may have gotten the message. After the incident, a spokesperson for Grisanti said the senator was meeting with the local chapter of Marriage Equality New York, and would learn "more about their issues and concerns with regards to same-sex marriage." Grisanti told the advocates that he supports extending all the same rights to same sex couples that married couples enjoy, but points to his Catholic upbringing when explaining that he can't sanction use of the term "marriage."

"Can’t you use a different word?" Grisanti asks in the Niagara Gazette. "I don’t care if you make up a word. Can’t you use a different word other than marriage?"

To date, there's no evidence that his mind has been changed.

Jim Alesi

Man, this video.

It really does look like Alesi "agonized" over his 'no' vote on same sex marriage in 2009, which is one of the reasons the state senator has come up on the list of Republican state senators that gay rights groups are lobbying.

Really, we shouldn't read too much into this; cameras were rolling, political theater, yadda yadda yadda—maybe he just wanted it to look like it pained him to vote the way he did, priming the pump for a hands-tied-by-constituency excuse come election season, should he need it.

On the other hand, Alesi had been considered a swing vote for months, and among the most likely Republicans to support a bill. It is, in fact, possible that Alesi was agonizing right down to the wire: his was only the second vote in the Senate, coming on the alphabetical heels of Democrat Joseph Addabbo, who led the session with a 'no.' Had the first Democrat voted yes, presenting a unified bloc right out of the gate, the first Republican may have joined him. "Addabbo’s vote was a clear signal that this thing was going to go down in flames," Alesi said. Given that Alesi was up for election the following year, he made the safe vote for a Republican senator.

Greg Ball

Greg Ball is listed as "undecided," and on activists' radar not least for his prior statements decrying the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy and gubernatorial candidate Carl Paladino's disparaging remarks about gay lifestyles. A former Assemblyman, Ball voted against the gay marriage bill in 2009, although it passed in his chamber.

Ball will be interesting to watch because his vote will actually matter this time. In the Assembly, gay marriage bills succeed with overwhelming support; while there, Ball could make the safe party-line "no" vote, avoid risking his clout with conservative voters, and still know that the legislation would move on with or without him. The assumption is that if there's even the slightest itch to vote "yes," he'll entertain it more than before.

The Senator suddenly finds himself with a lot more efficacy, and he's said publicly that he might not stick to the script. "Right now I don't have a position," Ball said recently. "We're keeping the conversation going."

Andrew Lanza

Andrew Lanza of Staten Island comes up on the watch list because he hung on to his "undecided" label so long in 2009.

Lanza also appears swayable because of the local (and Republican) backlash following his eventual "no" vote. Another thing that makes him interesting to gay marriage supporters is the vote he cast last year in favor of allowing any two unmarried partners to adopt children. The bill passed both houses of the legislature and was sponsored by Senator Thomas Duane, the only openly gay member of the Senate and one of the Democrats who's leading the charge for marriage equality legislation.

His geographical proximity to Democratic Senator Diane Savino, also of Staten Island and one of the most vocal proponents for gay marriage, probably helps his case too.

In general, New Yorkers United for Marriage are likely approaching as many Republican senators as possible, but especially those who were at any time "undecided" in 2009, a list that also includes Roy McDondald, Kemp Hannon and John Bonacic, among others. Those three Senators, however, have less to suggest they'll change their minds than Andrew Lanza: all voted against Senator Duane's unmarried adoption bill in 2010.


More in:

Comments [1]

D. Kincaid from NY

The right for Same Sex couples to choose who they marry AND be legally recognized for exercising that right is todays Civil Rights movement. At one time African Americans, Jews and Women all faced similar discrimination and persecution.

When those battles were raging on, there were many who were opposed of "recognizing" them as first class citizens. They argued, "the country would never be the same." They used "fear" as a weapon to instill in people that recognizing them as first class citizens would be the wrong thing to do. Afterall, weren't there bigger issues at hand?

Aren't you glad the leaders of that time considered but ultimately did what was right? I thank God they did every day. If they didn't the Senate floor (our city and nation) would look very different than it does today. In fact, many of us who enjoy freedom, may not if it weren't the true leaders of that time.

Recently, the Church has issued the "just say no" campaign against same-sex marriage depicting children as the victims of a law allowing same sex couples to marry. Ridiculous. What they fail to understand is that many of those young people are tomorrows gays and lesbian couples. That is a fact. In time, these men and women will want to choose (legally) who there partner is going to be. And they deserve to be recognized for doing so.

If, as a member of the NY State Senate you vote "no" to recognizing same-sex marriage in New York State, how are you, Senator, going to explain that you excluded them? We owe it to ALL couples the right to choose and be acknowledged for doing so. Religious beliefs or interpretations of such things is no longer an argument for doing what's right.

Choose What's Right...because its the right thing to do.

Thank You.

May. 16 2011 03:06 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


About It's A Free Country ®

Archive of It's A Free Country articles and posts. Visit the It's A Free Country Home Page for lots more.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at revsonfoundation.org.


Supported by