The S.C. Debate's Would-be (and Should-be) Heroes

Wednesday, May 04, 2011 - 04:29 PM

Rick Santorum, former Pennsylvania Senator (Brendan Smialowski/Getty)

In the political world, earlier is often better. The Iowa caucuses continue to leave their mark, despite not actually mattering, simply because they're first. States will fight to the death to keep their early primary schedules, seemingly moving them up every year. In theory then, the Republican debate tomorrow in South Carolina should be a fairly big deal. In practice, well, it's May 2011 - so it likely won't be.

Of course something big could happen. I even have hopes as to what that would be: In my perfect world, this is the moment America really sees Herman Cain and realizes he'd be ideal to lead this country after the haphazard leadership of Barack Obama.

I have an admitted soft spot for Cain, having worked on his U.S. Senate race in Georgia in 2004. Back then, I'd tell anyone who would listen about Cain and how he was the most impressive candidate I'd ever seen. He lost that three-way primary race, his first and last, by a very slim margin besting a sitting Congressman and narrowly avoiding a runoff with the current U.S. Senator Johnny Isakson who went on to win the Republican nomination and the seat. I was heartbroken.

I've been on a lot of campaigns, before and since, and none compared to that one (though working on Bush 2004 in Colorado was similar in intensity). When Cain spoke it was magic. The staff was permanently entranced. The fact is that very often candidates are megalomaniacs and unbearable to be around. Cain was the exact opposite. He was humble and real, passionate and brilliant. Everywhere we went people would go nuts for Cain.

It's been really gratifying see Herman Cain rise to prominence on the national stage along with the Tea Party, and not just because in typical hip New Yorker fashion I love that I knew of him first. He deserves it, he's amazing.

Do I think he can win? The truth is that I don't. It's not because he's not incredible, he is, it's the simple fact that I don't think you go from businessman to president of the United States. Americans just don't think that way. I thought the same thing, that mayor to president wouldn't work, but with additional reasons, about Rudy Giuliani the last time around. And like the last time, I would so love to be wrong.

Most people will be watching this debate to see if Tim Pawlenty is the real deal. He's considered the only "top-tier" candidate participating and this debate might give him the chance to become the presumed front-runner.

Rick Santorum is at the absolute bottom of my list. It's partially because I hold a grudge against him for backing Arlen Specter instead of Pat Toomey in a U.S. Senate primary years ago (yes, yes, Bush did too and I hold a grudge against him for that among many other things) but I also just find the idea of his candidacy nonsensical. If you were an elected official and couldn't win re-election in your own state, how in the world do you then become president? You don't. Get off the stage.

Ron Paul will probably be in every debate, for both parties if he could get away with it, until he's well into his 90s. Unlike a lot of Republicans, I don't hate Ron Paul, don't find him to be a distraction. Sure, he lives in a lalaland where all the trappings of politics don't exist but so what? He's entertaining and forces the conversation toward smaller government every time.

I know next to nothing about former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson and I imagine that's true for most Americans. He's fairly libertarian, from what I understand, so will probably seek to differentiate himself from Ron Paul.

It's anyone's game. This debate could end in a break-out star who takes the lead in the primary. Or, it could be widely ignored and dismissed. I'm betting on the latter.

Born in the Soviet Union and raised in Brooklyn, Karol Markowicz is a public relations consultant in NYC and a veteran of Republican campaigns in four states. She blogs about politics at Alarming News and about life in the city with her husband and baby at 212 BabyShe can be followed on Twitter.


More in:

Comments [6]

Jason from Los Angeles


While I am what you might call a whole-hearted Ron Paul supporter, I do not have a problem with people who don't fully agree with his views. What irks me is the dismissive attitude that terms like "lala-land" represent. I am glad that you are sympathetic to some of Ron Paul's positions, but I think that "lala-land" was a poor choice of words for describing a man who--whether you agree with him or not--has extremely sophisticated, coherent (and to a great extent, scholarly reputable, though admittedly unpopular) arguments to support those positions.

With that said, I enjoyed the rest of your article.

Have a nice day,

May. 08 2011 06:05 PM
Karol from NYC

Hahaha, "establishment" Republican and "neocon". Original.

To Ron Paul fans whole-hearted adulation of the man is the only acceptable position. I didn't say anything negative about him and I have a generally sympathetic view of him. If that's not enough, I don't know what to tell you.

May. 06 2011 03:41 PM
Mark from Bronx

Hi Karol, I'm disappointed in your view of Ron Paul. If the Tea Party movement has taught us anything, it's establishment Republicans like yourself that are in la-la land.

What's more disappointing is that wnyc allows a neo-con to represent the conservative view.

May. 06 2011 03:10 AM
Vito Danelli from Darien, CT

I see the slighting of Ron Paul's candidacy is even on this blog.

Why are there links for Cain, Santorum, and Pawlenty after the article, but not one for Ron Paul?

Are you aware that Ron Paul will be in the debate tonight?

If there's a straw poll tonight, Ron Paul will win it hands-down!

May. 05 2011 04:38 PM
Heather from Georgia

I love Cain too! I voted for him in 2004. Unfortunately, the rest of the family went with the East Cobber they knew from school, club, etc. My mother worked as a temp at Godfather's in the payroll dept. When he took over the company she was impressed that he gated to know her name. If you have ever are generally ignored. So, I was very excited when he entered the 2004 race. I am even more excited now to see Cain on a national stage.

May. 05 2011 11:41 AM
Art Van Delay from NYC

Great post. I wasn't even aware there was SC debate this week. Will be interested to see how H Cain performs.

May. 05 2011 10:26 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


About It's A Free Blog

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a blog, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at



Supported by