Streams

Ten Years After Closure, Fresh Kills Is Still a Landfill in Transition

Monday, March 21, 2011

Ten years ago Tuesday the last barge of garbage was delivered to Fresh Kills landfill on Staten Island. The closure of the dump — visible from space, taller than the Statue of Liberty and once the world's largest landfill — was a watershed moment for Staten Islanders, who had lived with its odor and stigma for 54 years.

But the repercussions of Fresh Kills' closure are still being felt by the rest of the city and its sanitation department. 

"It was always one of those things, 'Well, Fresh Kills will be around for a long time,'" Sanitation Commissioner John Doherty said. "And then, all of a sudden, it got the notice that it was going to close down. And that required a major change in the department's operation.  How are we going to get rid of garbage?"

Fresh Kills was not shut down because it was at capacity.  It was closed as a thank you from Rudolph Giuliani to the borough that helped make him the first Republican to be elected mayor since John Lindsey in 1965.  In 1996, two years after he took office, Giuilani and fellow Republican George Pataki signed an agreement to close Fresh Kills by the end of 2001.

 Eric Goldstein, a senior attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council, remembered being pleased and puzzled by the move.

"There were many good things about closure," Goldstein said. "The removal of noxious odors, a significant decrease in local water pollution and a redefining of the borough's identity and a restoration of community pride. But we were concerned because there was no comprehensive, long-term plan for what to do with the city's waste."

The sanitation department scrambled, and came up with an interim plan that relied on private waste companies and their out-of-state landfills. It's still in use today. 

City sanitation trucks drop trash off at 13 privately owned waste transfer stations located in a handful of neighborhoods that are mostly populated by minorities: Red Hook, Hunts Point, Greenpoint, Jamaica. From there, long-haul trucks take our garbage far away from Fresh Kills to landfills in Pennsylvania and Virginia.

Disposal costs have soared from $43 a ton to dump at Fresh Kills to $60 a ton when the interim plan went into effect in 2001. Now it is $97 a ton. Multiply that by the 11,000 tons of trash the sanitation department collects every day. Doherty, the sanitation commissioner, said this is the biggest negative consequence of closing Fresh Kills.

"Eventually, the people have, in New York City,  to recognize what the cost is of getting rid of garbage," Doherty said. "I mean, we have a billion dollar budget, and we probably have a third of that budget is for exporting waste."

And what did it use be?

"Oh, probably less than 20 percent," he said.

And then there are what NRDC's Eric Goldstein calls the true costs: the environmental consequences of switching from barges, to trucks.  Instead of three barges a day taking our trash to Fresh Kills, about 600 18-wheelers head out of the city every day from those 13 transfer stations.

Annette LaMatto, who spent part of the last decade fighting the city's interim plan, said the closure of Fresh Kills transformed the streets in her neighborhood of Greenpoint into a conga line of trucks, and she's still waiting for a reprieve.

"We're still inundated with a large amount of truck traffic," LaMatto said. 

There were already private waste transfer stations handling commercial garbage in Greenpoint, but the closure of Fresh Kills created a deluge of residential garbage, too.  

"It increased the flow [of trucks]," LaMatto said.  And, 10 years later, "basically, it hasn't changed. They closed it and we suffered the burden of it."

Ten years later, Mayor Michael Bloomberg is trying to tackle the truck problem. His solid waste management plan relies on packing garbage into containers, and moving those containers out of the city by barge and train.  Already, three waste containerization facilities are in operation in the Bronx, in Greenpoint and at Fresh Kills. Five more will eventually be built — three have been stalled by litigation.  Once complete, the city promises the system will eliminate six million miles' worth of garbage truck trips a year.

But Doherty said there are still landfills at the end of those truck trips, and all the problems that come with them: smell, drifting waste and greenhouse gas emissions.

"As far as the environmental issues for landfilling, we’re still faced with that," he said. "We have to continue to look for a better method."

Doherty said waste-to-energy, or burning garbage for electricity, won't work here because of stiff public opposition. The sanitation department plans to issue requests for information for new trash-ridding technologies.

Goldstein, with the Natural Resources Defense Council, says the city should be spending more effort on improving the rate of recycling, which has dropped since Fresh Kills was closed, from 20 percent to 16 percent.  

"Ultimately, we save the most money and do the best for our planet if we reduce the amount of waste we generate," Goldstein said. "We've got to do more to get an effective recycling program as part of our waste management.  That should be the cornerstone rather than out of state landfills be the cornerstone of solid waste management policy here."

Doherty said the city's taken big strides in recycling, signing a long-term deal to have Sims Metal Management handle metal, glass and plastic.  Sims is building a processing facility in Sunset Park, Brooklyn, that will take the material by barge, which will get even more trucks off the roads.

And as for Fresh Kills, it, too, is being recycled. Over the next 30 years, it will be turned into a park — one nearly three times the size of Central Park. But already, the project is encountering problems.

The first segment — several soccer fields near the edge of the garbage mounds — has been put on hold because the foundation is sinking. But Doherty said the landfill has great potential, and its man-made mountains of garbage, now covered with dirt and vegetation, are already attracting wildlife.

"We have at least one red fox out there now, which is incredible," Doherty said, with a smile.  "A whole herd of deer out there. A lot of ticks!"

He added: "You know, it's a whole new world out there."

Doherty, Bloomberg, Parks Commissioner Adrian Benepe and others will hold a ceremony at Fresh Kills to mark the 10-year anniversary of the beginning of that whole new world.   

Doherty says it will take a while for Staten Islanders to reorient themselves to a world where Fresh Kills is a park, not a landfill, an asset, not a nuisance.

"My grandchildren, if I asked them, if I said to them, 'Fresh Kills,' they wouldn't know what I was talking about," he said. "But my children, they would know.  So, it's two generations of forgetting about it."

Tags:

More in:

News, weather, Radiolab, Brian Lehrer and more.
Get the best of WNYC in your inbox, every morning.

Comments [4]

D from SI from Staten Island

Oh please--This piece smelled of the typical elitist attitude! Erica, above, is spot on- the garbage that was forced onto Staten Island (one of the most beautiful places throughout history until the Fresh Kills's initial short-term land fill usage was extended by decades) was a crime. If you want to keep your own garbage, do so...we have had our share of yours.

Mar. 23 2011 06:12 PM
PK from Manhattan

I am writing to give HUGE KUDOS to Amy Eddings. Always an outstanding journalist, this piece surpassed your usual excellence. As local NYC news is more of a rare commodity, I was profoundly informed and saw how these issues affect me currently, and possibly in the future. Thanks also for illuminating me on important historical background.

I had no idea, when I turned on the radio, that I needed to be aware of the 10 year anniversary of the Fresh Kills closing. Now, I am aware of so much more because of this excellent work!

Mar. 22 2011 12:00 PM
ericka

There wouldnt be "stiff public opposition" to waste- as-energy if our trash dumpsites were on the Upper East side, Tribeca, Brooklyn Heights, and the increasingly chic Queens waterfront, instead of trucked out of site. This city is the epitome of wasteful, from its culture of consumption to the growth of fast food culture and its accompanying packaging. We should be ostracized, federally fined, for such a shameful recycling rate.

Mar. 22 2011 11:43 AM
MK from NJ

"Doherty said waste-to-energy, or burning garbage for electricity, won't work here because of stiff public opposition. The sanitation department plans to issue requests for information for new trash-ridding technologies."

For another perspective on the W2E issue, have a look at this NY Times article from April 13, 2010:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/13/science/earth/13trash.html

Here is a quote from it: "With all these [air pollution control] innovations, Denmark now regards garbage as a clean alternative fuel rather than a smelly, unsightly problem. And the incinerators, known as waste-to-energy plants, have acquired considerable cachet as [upscale] communities like Horsholm vie to have them built."

Perhaps this is worth a second look, as a way to convert an unsustainable lose-lose situation into a sustainable win-win. The key is the begin to think of "waste" as a valuable resource that we are now literally throwing away.

Mar. 21 2011 04:55 PM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Sponsored

Latest Newscast

 

 

Support

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public

Feeds

Supported by