Streams

Politics of Destruction and Distraction in Wisconsin

Friday, March 11, 2011 - 04:22 PM

WNYC
Authorities attempt to eject protestors from Wisconsin. (Scott Olson/Getty)

"We need to end collective bargaining because of our state’s budget crisis. Oh, the unions have agreed to concessions that would ease our budget woes? Then we need to end collective bargaining because it structurally impacts our ability to set our state on firm fiscal grounding. Oh, we can’t pass a fiscal measure without sufficient quorum? Then we just need to forget the fiscal parts of this bill and just end collective bargaining!"

In the end, the changing logic of Governor Scott Walker comes down to this: We need to end collective bargaining. Period.

Any other rationale about its impact on the state budgets or the necessity for the fiscal health of the state can change because those aren’t the real reasons. The true impetus is that conservatives want to break the unions. They want to take away the vehicle that has helped build a middle class in America. They want to decimate one of the few entities that can provide any counterweight to corporate interests and the influence of the super-rich.

This real motivation was on display when the Republicans in the Wisconsin State Senate cleaved the collective bargaining piece out of a larger fiscal bill in order to pass it without Democratic representation on Wednesday night.

The Republicans, with the exception of moderate Dale Shultz, engaged in the politics of destruction - no longer cloaked behind claims of fiscal necessity and economic prudence, they revealed they simply wanted to destroy their opposition.

Which is, of course, their right. Just as it’s the right of the people of Wisconsin to express their disapproval with unprecedented protests, the right of Democratic Senators to work to prevent such a vote and the right of the voters to begin recall proceedings across the state.

Americans approve of the right of collective bargaining, both as a democratic principle and as a practical means to ensure decent wages and safe working conditions. So Republicans are taking a risk attacking something so widely viewed as part of the American economy – just as Democrats would overstep if they tried to do away with corporations entirely. However, when the right-wing engages in an act of destruction, they are very good at disguising it with an act of distraction.

As protesters rally in Madison against Scott Walker, you can be sure conservatives will distract us by talking about how the protesters are really outside agitators. As Wisconsinites express their disapproval of their Senate Republicans, we’re sure to hear more about Senate Dems shirking responsibility. As Americans voice solidarity with working families, conservatives are going to try to paint union workers as the new "welfare queens." And as progressives express outrage that the Wisconsin Senate went ahead with their vote, apologists are going to say it’s no different than the process of reconciliation in the United States Congress.

This last point was at the heart of Solomon Kleinsmith’s post at It’s A Free Country yesterday, in which he focused on MoveOn's message to its members that the Wisconsin Senate’s act was "shameful, unprecedented, and probably illegal." Solomon – an independent, not a conservative – argued that it was as legal as reconciliation and that this represented hypocrisy on MoveOn’s part. I responded in the comments that there were legitimate legal questions which had been identified and are likely to head into court battles. Solomon replied that those were weak arguments and I started researching more about the rules of procedure in Wisconsin.

Then I realized something. While workers are having their rights stripped away, while historic protests are gripping Madison and while Americans are showing solidarity across the country, I was about to argue protocol for a legislature in a state I’ve never lived in. And I’m not a lawyer.

And that’s when distraction becomes as dangerous as destruction. MoveOn was firing up its supporters over a truly shameful act, and here I was debating the basis of one word they chose. Yes, there should be a debate about whether this act was legal, and that will take place before the Wisconsin Supreme Court. But the rest of us should beware. There has been an astonishing attack against workers, and if we’re not debating what kind of society we want, how to ensure widespread prosperity and the influence of the wealthy on our political process, then chances are we’re being distracted.

As protesters continue to fill the capital in Madison, as recall efforts sweep across Wisconsin and as solidarity rallies emerge around the country, being distracted would be destructive.

Tags:

More in:

Comments [3]

Harrison Bergeron from Fair Lawn NJ

This is another sign of our failing democracy. Another part of the transfer of control, wealth and power from the many to the few.

We accept that trillions of our tax dollars may subsidise a relatively small number of Wall Street banksters, but billions spread around a few tens of thousands of working people is something that government should clamp down on.

The working people of this country -- the hundred million of us -- are also "too big to fail". But when working people band together to speak with a collective voice, some politicians find that to be troublesome. So they are employing a "divide and conquer" strategy over the working classes, pitting public workers agains private workers.

Mar. 19 2011 09:13 PM
International Law from http://internationallawz.com/

Term of international law is used to refer the positions of crimes in any country or any free state.

Mar. 13 2011 05:08 AM
Solomon Kleinsmith from Omaha, NE

Well crafted dodge on the legal stuff. Still a dodge though.

I already argued elsewhere that the GOP is going overboard, and that I believe collective bargaining to be an extension of the right of free association, but the post you link to wasn't about that.

It was about how MoveOn, and most on the left, have no moral high ground here.

If you supported the use of reconciliation to pass the health care bill, you supported a rule that did the exact same thing as Walker and company did in Wisconsin - bypass a supermajority rule to pass a controversial bill.

Mar. 11 2011 10:12 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Sponsored

About It's A Free Blog

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a blog, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at revsonfoundation.org.

Authors

Feeds

Supported by