Streams

From Libya to Washington

Tuesday, March 01, 2011

WNYC

Welcome to Politics Bites, where every afternoon at It's A Free Country, we bring you the unmissable quotes from the morning's political conversations on WNYC. Today on the Brian Lehrer Show, David Sanger, Chief Washington Correspondent for the New York Times, discussed what's on the Obama administration's mind today.

Warships, no-fly zones, and UN resolutions in the Middle East. Unions, collective bargaining and budget troubles around the US — there's a lot on President Obama's mind these days.

A CBS News Poll released on Tuesday reports a majority of Americans oppose efforts to limit collective bargaining for unions and are also against slashing pay and benefits to public workers in order to reduce state budget deficits. A quarter of those surveyed view labor unions unfavorably, but 42 percent said they hadn't heard enough about labor unions to have an opinion.

David Sanger said, he's not shocked anymore about what people don't know.

Always what's shocking in polls is when people admit what they haven't heard of. In the course of watching what's going on in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, all the other places in recent times, I've been astounded by the poll numbers of people who say they have only barely heard that there is something going on.

As for deficit woes, Sanger explained why it's something the states are shouldering as opposed to Wall Street.

Certainly there have been growing deficits and the effort to get out of the economic situation. The US has been in for the last two years has taken those deficits and put them on steroids. So now, suddenly we're trying to catch up with a deficit conversation that we probably, as a nation, should have been having much more seriously before the crash of '08 and '09...and it's fallen down to the states in time because once federal aid begins to dry up, it flows down to the troubles that the states have.

As for Libya, as discussions continue in the White House about what to do next, Sanger argued that the central question is whether NATO, the US or the UN can intervene when a country hasn't "committed an act of aggression" beyond its own borders. This is an issue that came up in Rwanda and Serbia, and we're seeing it again.

Sanger went on to say, there are two things that haven't gone wrong in Libya that could have.

The first is, we don't have a hostage crisis. That gives the president much more leeway now in deciding what to do...The second and far more important of these...is that the Bush administration was successful in 2003 and 2004 in getting the nuclear weapons program stopped and shipped out of Libya and getting its chemical weapons destroyed...This was volunteered by Gadhafi as he was trying to win his way back into the good graces of Western countries...Can you imagine how much more complex the situation we're facing now, horrific as it may be, would be if Colonel Gadhafi could threaten the use of nuclear chemical weapons?

Tags:

More in:

The Morning Brief

Enter your email address and we’ll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Comments [7]

Ph. Dr. Manuel Iglesias - Guerrero from A Estrada, Spain

Libya Today (es, en, it):

http://aims.selfip.org/~alKvc74FbC8z2llzuHa9/default_libia.htm

Mar. 07 2011 10:04 PM
Eugenia Renskoff from Brooklyn

Hi, Brian, Your guest has obviously never lost his home to foreclosure because of mortgage fraud and predatory lending. He has almost no sympathy for us, the borrowers who went through a horrible experience. Bernie Madoff is a crook but there are many others out there and they have not been put in jail. I applaud Charles Ferguson for mentioning this fact when he accepted his Oscar for Inside Job this past Sunday night. Eugenia Renskoff

Mar. 01 2011 01:53 PM
DTorres from Nathan Strauss Projects

Well we bombed the hell out of Iraq,
leaving thousands of civilian casualties,
for no good reason.
We are in Afghanistan, our drones,
killing the civilian population.

What does Libya have that we want?

We wouldn't be there if we had no
American interest to protect.

Mar. 01 2011 01:39 PM
A JENKINS from U.K.

IT IS INTERESTING TO SEE THE CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE MIDDLE EAST, AS AN ADENT OBSERVER OF THE JEWISH/ISLAMIC SITUATION I READ MANY DIFFERENT POINTS OF VIEW. AS A BRITISH CITIZEN I WAS JUST WAITING TO SEE THE FALLOUT REGARDING THE RELEASED LOCHABY BOMBER FROM SCOTLAND, AFTER SEVERAL MONTHS MY EYES HAVE WITNESSED IT.

Mar. 01 2011 12:07 PM
Jeff Pappas from CT

Too bad it always seems to come to Military options, once the people who have been abused for years stand up, while for years the USA just turned a blind , profit driven and Extraudinarily Renditious Eye ( sp ?)
My concern is the USA's policy in the Middle East that supports Kingdoms and other Non democratic Nation States. Not to mention the support of Israels human rights abuses !
Then the USA is caught with her pants down on what to do ?
Just be Honest from the start.
Liberty ,Justice and freedom for ALL.

Mar. 01 2011 10:32 AM
hjs11211

re: why people like unions? maybe people know public union members

bl re: poll, i never heard of unions, americans are stupid

Mar. 01 2011 10:32 AM
RJ from prospect heights

I'm surprisingly pleased that 40% of the US public says they haven't heard enough about unions. All people do hear is when unions are in conflict--contract fights, strikes, etc. They don't hear enough about the day-to-day good that unions do, and that they don't consider the j"conflicts only" media coverage sufficient speaks *very* well of the US public.

Mar. 01 2011 10:32 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Sponsored

About It's A Free Country ®

Archive of It's A Free Country articles and posts. Visit the It's A Free Country Home Page for lots more.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at revsonfoundation.org.

Feeds

Supported by