City Unions Brace For Battle With Bloomberg

Friday, February 04, 2011

This week, the city's labor unions got their first official glimpse at what Mayor Michael Bloomberg thinks future union hires should expect in the 21st century. The comprehensive proposal was presented to the Muncipal Labor Council not by Mayor Bloomberg himself, but by his Commissioner for Labor Relations James Hanley.

In his State of the City address this year, Mayor Bloomberg said he would not sign off on any pay raises unless he won pension concessions from the city's unions. This plan outlines the concessions he wants. If he can enlist Albany support, new hires will have to work longer to qualify and longer to collect their pensions, with non-uniform hires working until 65 to retire.

Currently, depending on years of service, and when they joined the city workforce, non-uniform workers can retire as young as 57, and in some cases even younger. These workers can be vested in the pension after just five years. The mayor's reforms would push that out to ten years. New hires would have to contribute more to their pension.

This year, thanks in large measure to the recent meltdown on Wall Street, the city has to pay $8 billion out of its budget to make good on pension obligations just for this year. That number is expected to be even higher next year.

The mayor says that the rising costs of pension and fringe benefits will increasingly squeeze out vital services. "Do we want to have teachers, cops, firefighters, sanitation workers and everybody else that helps the city function, or do we want to continue that benefit?" Bloomberg asked reporters rhetorically on Thursday. "There is no more money."

For District 37 President Lillian Roberts, who represents more than a third of the City's 300,000 workforce, the mayor's plan undermines not just public employees, but the city's middle class.

"One percent of this city receives 44 percent of the resources here in this city and that is ridiculous and the rest of us are bumping elbows here trying to get a crumb," Roberts said.

While the unions blasted Mayor Bloomberg's comprehensive pension reform proposals, the Citizens Budget Commission applauded them. Charles Brecher with the CBC said that when the stock market performs well, the city's contribution towards pensions goes down because the pension funds invested in the market produce the returns needed. But when it drops, as it just did, taxpayers have to make up the difference. And the impact can linger.

"When it does worse, the city has to put in more money in subsequent years, and they average it out over multiple years," Brecher said.

Brecher said another key pension cost driver is that, on average, pensioners are living much longer than they did decades ago. And Brecher said CBC backs the mayor's call to raise the city's retirement age to 65 for non-uniform workers and raising the bar for when workers can draw down a disability pension.

Bloomberg's proposed pension overhaul is also aimed at the city's uniformed services — police, fire and corrections.

Norman Seabrook, who leads the Correction's Officers Union, said the mayor is not factoring in the health impacts of the stress that police, fire and corrections officer face on the job. He says he sees the toll first hand when he attends the funerals of his rank and file. "I have been to 125 funerals of correction officers. And most of them had died at such a young age, they weren't even 50 years old."

Seabrook said since the city's increased pension costs are linked to the financial crisis, the city's wealthiest households should pay higher taxes, instead of rolling back public employee pensions. He said the mayor is using the crisis as a pretext to break the unions.

Under Mayor Bloomberg's pension reform proposal, future police, fire and correction officer retirees would also lose an annual $12,000 stipend known as a variable supplemental they get in addition to their pension. The Bloomberg administration calculates it could save $200 million dollars if it discontinued the stipend, which union critics call it a "Christmas bonus."

But Detective Endowment Association President Michael Palladino said that to get it, the unions agreed to a reduced pay scale for all future hires that has saved the city billions.

"The unions paid dearly at the bargaining table surrendering cash up front and also making concessions in that 1987-90 round," Palladino recalled.

The deal also permitted the city pension funds to diversify out of conservative bonds into the stock market, while pulling some money out for the city budget.


More in:

Comments [5]

SUSAN DRUSS from Queens, NY

Mayor Bloomberg has been systematically reducing the public middle class workforce since he's been in office. He believe the teachers, for one, do not have a backbone. He is very mistaken. Our heros, the firemen, police, emt's, para's, nurses, are nothing more than ants that he feels he can crush. He needs to get a "Pink Slip". He is not going to stop the movement created by his cronies and Republican thieves, to take away the middle class future and distribute it among his Wall Street, Banks and Corporate pals. No one has asked how his business has been since he took office. Does anyone know?

Apr. 02 2011 02:07 PM
Debbie from Brooklyn

I believe that Bloomberg along with the rest of the richest two percent of us in America are greedy, selfish, cold, heartless people. He's cutting our services, he's laying off low paid civil servants while sourcing out their jobs to high price companies. He's trying to bust up the unions and make modern day slaves of anyone who is not rich in NYC. He's blaming the City Worker for the City's crisis, when mis management, out sourcing and the big unpoliced contracts are the biggest parts of this crisis, not the Civil Servants pensions. The average Civil Servants pension is $20,000. annually... the big pensions are the uniform and armed forces, you know NYPD, FDNY, Correction Officers, Sanitation etc. And they deserve the big pensions! So Bloomberg needs to find more humane ways to cut and balance his budget... STOP GUTTING OUT THE CITY!

Feb. 08 2011 07:17 PM
Frank from Brooklyn

I understand and sympathize with City's current fiscal crisis. I hope that the general public and City administrators also understand that City workers took reduced salary gains in favor of pension benefits. The City felt this was a good idea at the time since they were able to deffer cost. It would not be appropriate for the City to renege on those agreements now since City workers have already accepted reduced salaries for many years.

Feb. 04 2011 03:10 PM

I guess Hizzoner doesn't get that pay and pension are all elements of total compensation. If he has arguments that CIty employees are overpaid in total compensation, let's see them.

Feb. 04 2011 01:50 PM
sara from downtown

another hoax by bloomberg

Feb. 04 2011 11:16 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


Latest Newscast




WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public


Supported by