Streams

New Museum Installs Controversial Wojnarowicz Video, Following Smithsonian Censorship

Arts organizations are crying foul after the institute removed a work of art from an exhibit related to gay-themed portraiture.

Wednesday, December 08, 2010 - 09:58 AM

WNYC

It's been a combative week at the intersection of art and politics. Last week, the Smithsonian removed a video work by artist David Wojnarowicz from a gay-themed portraiture show at the National Portrait Gallery after a right wing pile-on was stirred up by the Catholic League (a lay organization that does not receive funds from the Church) and anti-gay talking heads such as Brent Bozell, a figure, who has described homosexuality as "morally wrong."

The Beef: 11 seconds out of Wojnarowicz's 13-minute image mash-up, titled "A Fire in My Belly," show ants crawling on a crucifix—as well as other racy imagery. The piece was intended as a meditation on the AIDS pandemic. (Wojnarowicz succumbed to complications from the disease in 1992.) Bozell has described it—and the rest of the show, for that matter—as "anti-Christian bigotry." As a result, he, and others (including incoming House Speaker John Boehner), have questioned the goings-on at the taxpayer-funded Smithsonian, even though no public moneys were used to put on the show. (It was privately funded.)

The Blowback: In response to the criticism, the Smithsonian pulled the video, stating that "it was not the museum's intention to offend." The arts community—across the nation—was immediately critical of the move. The Association of Art Museum Directors quickly issued a statement, criticizing the decision as "regrettable" and scolding the "unwarranted and uninformed censorship from politicians and other public figures, many of whom, by their own admission, have seen neither the exhibition as a whole or this specific work." PPOW, the gallery that manages Wojnarowicz's estate also issued a statement disagreeing with the decision, and offering another interpretation of the work. The New York Times published an op-ed editorial condemning the move as an "appalling act of political cowardice." And countless bloggers and writers (including myself) have taken the museum to task for pulling a work of art rather than encouraging a dialogue about it. The Smithsonian responded to all of this by issuing a statement saying it didn't want Wojnarowicz's work to distract from the greater exhibit. In a week that was all about statements, this one said next to nothing.

The Blowback to the Blowback: On Sunday, a protestor entered the museum and played the video on an iPad. He promptly got arrested. Around the country, arts organizations have rallied to show solidarity with Wojnarowicz, holding screenings of "A Fire in My Belly" or creating displays around it. In New York, PPOW put an original version online. The New Museum, downtown, has put the video on display in its lobby gallery—which visitors can access without having to pay the museum admission fee.

My Take: It is a shame to see the Smithsonian buckle to such nakedly political pressure. At no point did any visitor to the gallery complain about the video—and the undercurrent framing this debate is distastefully anti-gay, as art critic Christopher Knight points out in a thoughtful article in The L.A. Times. Art isn't always about comfort. Sometimes it takes us to places we don't necessarily want to see or recognize. Wojnarowicz's work was created in 1987, at a time when the AIDS pandemic was ravaging the gay population, with little sympathy to be had from a significant portion of the American populace. His video is not meant to be pretty. It was a cry against complacency—a complacency that could now have a few, highly vocal political partisans curating our art exhibits.

What do you think of the video? Please let us know by posting a comment below.

Tags:

More in:

News, weather, Radiolab, Brian Lehrer and more.
Get the best of WNYC in your inbox, every morning.

Comments [1]

Anni from NYC

Glad to see so many people rally around artistic freedom, freedom of speech and the important role cultural institutions play in America. The Smithsonian was short-sighted and wimpy and missed an important opportunity for dialog.

Dec. 08 2010 10:28 PM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Sponsored

About Gallerina

Carolina A. Miranda is a regular contributor to WNYC and blogs about the arts for the station as "Gallerina." In addition to that, she contributes articles on culture, travel and the arts to a variety of national and regional media, including Time, ArtNews, Travel + Leisure and Budget Travel and Florida Travel + Life. She has reported on the burgeoning industry of skatepark design, architectural pedagogy in Southern California, the presence of street art in museums and Lima's burgeoning food scene, among many other subjects. In 2008, she was named one of eight fellows in the USC Annenberg/Getty Arts Journalism Program for her arts and architecture blog C-Monster.net, which has received mentions in the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times. In January of 2010, the Times named her one of nine people to follow on Twitter. Got a tip? E-mail her at c [@] c-monster [dot] net

Feeds

Supported by