Streams

House Censures Rangel for Ethics Violations

Thursday, December 02, 2010

Rep. Charlie Rangel was censured for violating 11 congressional ethics rules, the first time the House of Representatives took such a harsh step against one of their own, in decades.

After failing to get the punishment downgraded, the House overwhelmingly voted to punish the Harlem Democrat 333 to 79 with a censure.

The move required Rangel, a 20-term incumbent and decorated Korean War veteran, to stand on the floor of the House while Speaker Nancy Pelosi read aloud the resolution admonishing Rangel.

"I leave here knowing I'm an honest guy,” Rangel said after censure. "When history of this has been written, that people would recognize the vote for censure was a very, very, very political vote"

Defiantly, he added "I'm not going to be judged by this Congress" today, but rather, by the totality of his 40-year career.

He added, "Compared to where I've been, I haven't had a bad day since," he said, referring to the near-fatal injury he suffered in Korea, which he's often referenced during the 2-year investigation.

Rangel’s supporters tried to downgrade the punishment from a censure - the harshest punishment short of expulsion - into a reprimand, which is tantamount to being sent a desecrate letter about slight misbehaviors.

Rangel’s allies, nearly all of them Democrats, sought to portray Rangel's wrongdoing, as slight missteps of complicated tax and internal house rules about letterhead, but not part of any scheme to enrich himself or defraud the public.

Critics, all of them Republicans, spoke about the need to "restore" the public's trust in the Congress, and that easing Rangel's punishment would further erode that trust.

One Republican who spoke in defense of Rangel was Peter King of Long Island, who praised Rangel for his military service. King also said expulsion was like the death penalty, and censure was equal to life in prison, portraying it as too harsh for Rangel's admitted wrongdoing.

A bipartisan Ethics Committee found Rangel violated House rules banning members from using official resources - including staff and letterhead - in seeking contributions for a public college looking to build a school in his honor. Rangel's failure to pay taxes on income he earned on oversee rental property, plus incomplete financial disclosure forms, were also cited in the Ethics Committee report.

Tags:

More in:

News, weather, Radiolab, Brian Lehrer and more.
Get the best of WNYC in your inbox, every morning.

Comments [2]

Lawmakers reacting to a legal decision against them with the equistential snort, that some laws are unfair, and therefore inapplicable, only sounds equistential to us.

On the subject of Rangel's censure, though, if he did break any civil or criminal laws, will he be tried separately?

And if he owed/owes back taxes, will he be paying the full penalties?

Censure might be embarrassing but embarrassment is not a legal punishment, nor does it replace absconded public revenues. If the man stole he must repay.

Dec. 03 2010 09:33 AM
harash from nj

I think all problems in our nation like unemployment economy and difict every prob. will solve when our immigration reform because 11 milion undocument is a huge no. what u think they people r not working they all r working they r taking all benefit but they r not paying tax and the employers where they people r working they r also make benefit and money if they all r pay tax how much huge money come to our nation i think now these people can give the push to our country economy i think if these people got document they will spent money to buy car house they will also start the new business etc.when the huge buying will come in the market in the housing market in auto industry. on that time economy will come on the right direction that will hepen when our nation immigration reform will hepen so do the immigration reform first all the problems will solve automaticaly.

harash
postgraduate in economy

Dec. 02 2010 10:22 PM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Sponsored

Latest Newscast

 

 

Support

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public

Feeds

Supported by