What Does Evolution Want?
Airs Saturdays at 6AM on 93.9 FM
Saturday, May 21, 2011
If there's one strand of evolutionary theory that sticks in the craw of nearly every religious believer, it's the idea that human beings are just an evolutionary accident. But what if we aren't? What if the evolution of humans, or some brainy creature like us, was inevitable once life first appeared on Earth?
In this hour of To the Best of Our Knowledge, we'll talk with maverick paleontologist Simon Conway Morris and explore the question "What does evolution want?"
Comments [1]
I was so pleased when I heard John Haught pointed out that science does not tackle things like purpose, value, meaning, importance, God or even intelligence. This limitation of science is well supported by philosophers of science Peter Medawar and Karl Popper. And then immediately disappointed when Haught went on to say that what we learn form science can actually tell us something about purpose. When Paulson called him on the seeming switch in point of view, Haught said that we must distinguish between science as a method and what science produces in the way of discovery. Haught was right to say that purpose is outside the empirical realm of science and wrong, I think, to bring purpose back into the realm of science. Science is not so fickle about what it can and cannot do.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.