wnyc.org / 93.9fm / am 820

Karl Rove: Man and Myth

Monday, June 23, 2008

Karl Rove has become a kind of mythic kingmaker in the public imagination. Paul Alexander’s new book about the man behind the myth is The Rise and Fall of Karl Rove.


Comments

  • [1] Peter from Hackettstown, NJ June 23, 2008 - 11:15AM

    Do you think Karl Rove will go to jail or be tried in world court?


  • [2] Charles from Manhattan June 23, 2008 - 12:09PM

    Do you think Antoin Rezko will go to jail or be tried in world court?


  • [3] Marissa from Manhattan June 23, 2008 - 12:10PM

    It is an insult to the profession of architecture to call Karl Rove an architect, not to mention it's illegal in most states to use the term for anyone other than a licensed practitioner.


  • [4] Steve from Manhattan June 23, 2008 - 12:11PM

    Can you imagine how many people would still be alive if he and the Boy King had never met? Thousands of soldiers, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis ... it boggles the mind. He should be tried for the war crimes he helped abet and jailed if found guilty.


  • [5] chris o from New York City June 23, 2008 - 12:12PM

    Karl Rove: his dreams of a permanent majority crash into probably the worst, most divisive and least popular presidencies ever. Good work, turd blossom.


  • [6] Steve from Manhattan June 23, 2008 - 12:14PM

    Remind the author that Rove won ONE election for Bush, who was appointed the first time.


  • [7] hjs from 11211 June 23, 2008 - 12:14PM

    the pardon is already signed and delivered.

    ugh! more psycho drama with rove family, what a suprise.


  • [8] chris o from New York City June 23, 2008 - 12:16PM

    There is at the least real if not compelling evidence that Kerry won in 2004, so perhaps it would be more accurate to say he stole 2 presidential elections. That is quite an accomplishment.


  • [9] antonio from park slope June 23, 2008 - 12:16PM

    Is Rove really to blame for the fall of the republicans? I would think it would be the neoconservative movement?


  • [10] Eric from Jersey City June 23, 2008 - 12:18PM

    Lee Atwater was gay? Don't you mean Terry Dolan?


  • [11] Concerned Citizen from Manhattan June 23, 2008 - 12:21PM

    #4 Steve,

    "He should be tried for the war crimes he helped abet and jailed if found guilty."

    On what legal grounds? You mean the current war in Iraq? The one sanctioned by UN Resolution 678 as a result of Iraq's UN documented violation of resolution 1441?

    You people are the Huffington equivalent of Fox News enthusiasts with your attempts to brand someone a 'criminal' without due process of law.

    But then again, lynching people was never based on proof, facts, or laws.


  • [12] antonio from park slope June 23, 2008 - 12:22PM

    Was Rove behind the attack on McCain in the infamous 2000 south carolina primary?


  • [13] AWM from UWS June 23, 2008 - 12:26PM

    #12

    "Lynching?"

    Yes, defend Rove, Bush and everyone else responsible for the war in Iraq. Good use of time and effort. They are victims now and you must help ease their suffering.


  • [14] Steve from Manhattan June 23, 2008 - 12:29PM

    @hjs - Bush can't pardon him from breaking international law.

    @CC - resolution was based on lies to the UN by the administration. And you could try him just as easily for the torture, Geneva Convs violations ... and I'm sure there's plenty more we don't even know about.


  • [15] hjs from 11211 June 23, 2008 - 12:29PM

    oh please, bush the lesser was a ceremonial president at best.


  • [16] hjs from 11211 June 23, 2008 - 12:35PM

    Steve, the USA doesn't submit to international law and rove will not be tried for war?

    if tried it will be on domestic coruption or the plaime affair. but will not spend time in jail.


  • [17] AWM from UWS June 23, 2008 - 12:36PM

    Was Rove for or against Bush dressing like a pilot, landing on an aircraft carrier in a fighter jet and speaking in front of the giant "mission accomplished" banner?


  • [18] ROBERT D. WEISS from NEW YORK June 23, 2008 - 12:37PM

    I think Karl Rove is brilliant....He did manage to get GWB elected, twice, in the face of an overhelmingLy biased media including, but not limited to, NPR...I am sure at some point you will interview someone with another point of view.....I should live so long !!!!


  • [19] chris o from New York City June 23, 2008 - 12:40PM

    The attack and invasion of Iraq was most certainly NOT sanctioned by the United Nations or any body thereof. Thus is was a war waged in violation of international law, a war of aggression, the precise crime for which Nazis were convicted and exectuted at Nurenberg.


  • [20] hjs from 11211 June 23, 2008 - 12:42PM

    ROBERT

    yes an evil genius, fooled the nation and destroyed the GOP, thanks, well see if it was worth it.


  • [21] chris o from New York City June 23, 2008 - 12:44PM

    Robert - You seem to forget the media coverage of 2000. Al Gore received blistering unrelentingly negative coverage from the media as the exagerrator. Bush was the folksy regular guy you'd want to have a beer with (if he was not an alcoholic who forswore alcohol many years before).


  • [22] AWM from UWS June 23, 2008 - 12:44PM

    #19

    Yes! It is all so unfair! When will they get the opportunity to tell their side of the story?


  • [23] hjs from 11211 June 23, 2008 - 12:49PM

    chris o

    and he forswore coke also!


  • [24] mc from Brooklyn June 23, 2008 - 12:50PM

    chris o #8

    There is credible evidence that the election in Ohio, my home state was stolen in '04. There was a Watergate style breakin in Toledo Ohio that I only heard about because My father told me about it. There were also many other shenanigans. The GOP secretary of state, Ken Blackwell was much more clever than Katherine Harris in FL at hiding his tracks. The only problem I have with this narrative is the 3 million more popular votes GWB received nation wide. What was up with that?


  • [25] mc from Brooklyn June 23, 2008 - 12:51PM

    chris o #22

    Isn't it interesting how the media love to pile on when they smell blood in the water?


  • [26] hjs from 11211 June 23, 2008 - 01:03PM

    mc

    the lines of voters in Ohio was a early indication that there was to be disenfranchisement.


  • [27] chris o from New York City June 23, 2008 - 01:06PM

    Yes mc, the media really treated Gore poorly. The most egregious example was the Love Canal story retold in the New York Times by Katharine "Kit" Seelye. It was a horrible piece of reporting, an outrageouls hit on Gore, and a complete fabrication of what he said about Love Canal.

    Al Gore claims he found Love Canal. AL Gore claims he invented the internet. Al Gore claims Tipper and he were the basis for Love Story. Waht a fantasist, what a liar. What a stiff boring guy that looks down on the common folk. That is the narrative the media went with.

    Ira Glass did a phenomenal look at the Love Canal quote - how Gore was inspiring young people that they could make a difference and the NY Times twisted it to make it seem like he was taking credit when he was giving all the credit to one young girl.


  • [28] mc from Brooklyn June 23, 2008 - 01:12PM

    chris o #28

    A cautionary tale for all of us. Beware the media mega-narrative. The least obvious is often the most true.


  • [29] mc from Brooklyn June 23, 2008 - 01:17PM

    hjs #27,

    Yes, the long lines, mostly in Cuyahoga and Franklin Counties, the most urban and Democratic counties. And then there was the bit about the "terrorist" scare in Warren County. Not to mention Blackwell throwing out voter registrations because of the paper stock they were printed on. Unbelievable. When he ran for governor against Ted Strickland in '06 he actually tried to get him thrown off the ballot (a stunt that Obama tried and succeeded at doing in the Illinois State Senate Primary). Luckily the OH courts didn't buy it. And then of course, Diebold's chief exec promising to deliver OH to GWB.


  • [30] hjs from 11211 June 23, 2008 - 01:19PM

    chris and others

    please don't take this as an attack but why it the media's fault all the time? when will the users of media get the blame. people watch 'the media,' advertisers pay for their product, the government asks nothing of the public airwaves. it's our fault we support them. same for big oil, but that's another topic.


  • [31] AWM from UWS June 23, 2008 - 01:20PM

    hjs #31,

    Amen!


  • [32] chris o from New York City June 23, 2008 - 01:22PM

    #25,

    Regarding the nationwide vote advantage Bush had over Kerry in 2004: the normally very accurate exit polls showed the opposite - Kerry had the advantage.

    A professor put out a study soon after the election. Just google "unexplained exit poll discrepancy" and there is a pretty concise, readable study casting doubt on Bush's "victory".


  • [33] hjs from 11211 June 23, 2008 - 01:24PM

    mc 30

    so one could say it was a laboratory for how to run election when you want a certain out come. will they use these skills in '08. ohio might be the only state that counts in november?

    has eva been around


  • [34] mc from Brooklyn June 23, 2008 - 01:25PM

    hjs,

    You are right. We should not be blaming the media which are just reflecting back what they think we want. What we should be doing is taking them to task when they act irresponsibly, as in being biased, not reporting very well or completely, or not getting stories from alternate points of view. But they are not to blame for our government. We are.


  • [35] chris o from New York City June 23, 2008 - 01:25PM

    hjs #31,

    i don't disagree with you at all. i will just point out that i was responding to a post that said Rove was brilliant because he got bush elected despite the liberal media bias. so i was just refuting the claim that the media was biased against bush and making the claim that it was the other way around.

    it's tough. we are just animals. the msm gives us fat and candy and drugs and those are more tempting than fruit and vegetables for most people, i guess...


  • [36] mc from Brooklyn June 23, 2008 - 01:29PM

    hjs,

    I think it will be harder in '08 because Ted Strickland is in charge. The secretary of state is in legal trouble and may be gone. I'm not sure. I will be spending the whole month of July in OH and I plan to look around and take the temperature. In '04 it was not a happy place. It was very divided. I'm expecting to see a lot of economic devastation.

    I haven't seen any posts from eva for over a week.


  • [37] mc from Brooklyn June 23, 2008 - 01:37PM

    chris o #33,

    My understanding is that the count of the actual votes showed a 3 million advantage for Bush. I also heard about the exit polls. But votes are what count. Does the professor think that there was widespread rigging all over the country? Because only that would explain a 3 million vote advantage. Believe me, it gives me no pleasure to say that. I haven't seen really good evidence or reporting of this, and I'm not big on conspiracy theories unless there is pretty good evidence.


  • [38] hjs from 11211 June 23, 2008 - 01:39PM

    mc, yes and the same can be said about the rulers we 'elect'

    chris o, thanks, we're on the same page. i just wanted make that point. i like the picture you paint with the candy, perfect.

    we are fat laden drones-mind and body. wnyc listeners excluded


  • [39] chris o from New York City June 23, 2008 - 01:44PM

    mc #38,

    yes the claim is that there was widespread counting fraud in 2004 (this is the electornic age of Diebold, etc. - it's a little easier to strike wide); if you remember, Drudge called it for Kerry and there was widespread dismay in the conservative camp because the nationwide exit polls showed a kerry advantage so the conservatives thought they lost

    it is not conspiracy theory stuff, just data simply presented


  • [40] mc from Brooklyn June 23, 2008 - 01:44PM

    chris o,

    I also appreciate the picture. I feel that way all the time and I don't even read the tabloids or watch Fox or MSNBC. Even NPR ant the NY Times has trouble avoiding the candy and fat.


  • [41] mc from Brooklyn June 23, 2008 - 01:58PM

    chris o #40,

    It may be data, but it isn't really conclusive in my mind. The recent primaries have proven over and over that polls are not that accurate, at least not any more. I'm also not willing to endow Drudge with that kind of authority, I think he plays it fast and loose sometimes.


  • [42] pk from NYC June 23, 2008 - 02:57PM

    Upon listening to Mr. Alexander expound upon the reputation of Mr. Rove, I was profoundly enlightened. Bizarre stuff, as one would come to say after hearing such histoire. Thanks, Leonard, for great radio.


Leave a Comment

Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.

Your comment


* required
The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party.
 
Back to Episode