wnyc.org / 93.9fm / am 820

How America Can Take the Lead in Science and Technology

Thursday, May 29, 2008

We look into what the U.S. needs to do to become a world leader in science and technology once again. Brian Greene is a professor of physics and mathematics at Columbia University and host of PBS series “The Elegant Universe”; he also helped put together the World Science Festival, happening in New York May 28-June 1.


Comments

  • [1] chestinee May 29, 2008 - 12:16PM

    Science doesn't get that it is only one way of examining a thing. If it were not held that science gets the last word science would hold more water with me.(science is letting Monsanto get away with poisoning the planet for example!!!)


  • [2] Richard Mitnick from Highland Park, NJ May 29, 2008 - 12:17PM

    Hey Leonard Lopate fans-

    Don't forget, while you are listening to one of the worlds best interview hosts on FM, you can also enhance the ambiance of your work/living space by streaming wnyc2, 24 hour music stream on your computer.

    Just go to www.wnyc.org and click on the stream you want next to the HDD symbol.

    No FM? Everything on the computer? If you have a reasonable new computer, you can stream the FM radio in one player, and wnyc2 in a second player. I use Winamp and RealPlayer. Just right click on the stream, select Copy Link, and paste it into your player. Then, you can save it as a bookmark in Winamp or a Favorite in RealPlayer.

    Party on.

    >>RSM


  • [3] JT from LI May 29, 2008 - 12:22PM

    I've always been puzzled by the disdain many people have for science and math. How can you not be curious about how things work? My son is three years old and my wife and I take every opportunity we can to show him something interesting and explain how it works. Everything from a helium balloon to a plane flying to ice melting is another chance to get him curious about how things work and how we can affect it instead of just accepting things as they are. It's easy to do and sometimes you learn something new.


  • [4] jw from nyc May 29, 2008 - 12:24PM

    I love this conversation. Happy to hear about the programs for kids at the Science Festival - Science and Art are inextricably linked - they are both ways of perceiving our world - left and right brain interpretations. Look at the photos from Hubble if you want to see a marriage of the two. Notice how the microcosmic and the macrocosmic have repeated patterns - from the swirl of a galaxy to the arrangement of the pistils and stamens of a sunflower. Whether you are "religious" or not, you can marvel at the wonders of our planet, our universe, and our place in it, the response to which is what is the core of the human need to create Art.


  • [5] JT from LI May 29, 2008 - 12:33PM

    @chestinee

    Monsanto's work is actually more about making money than applying science. Maybe you should consider how science has made the computer and internet you just used possible. It's led to a lot of medical advances (MRI, etc) that's made medicine better. And science is what will have to be used to clean up the environment and affect global warming. The reason it hasn't is political and financial. The Bush administration shows what can happen when science doesn't "hold water" with the people in power.


  • [6] ChrisD May 29, 2008 - 12:37PM

    I think it is important to distinguish between science and technology. Certainly the two work together, but I think science is generally a way of approaching things or of examining how things work. I think many people disillusioned with science are, in reality, disillusioned with technology and some of the ill effects it has had on the environment, etc. Certainly though, the successes of science and technology have far outweighed its ill-effects. But I understand the ambivalence many people feel toward science and technology. Consider the eradication of smallpox against the development of nuclear weapons.


  • [7] eva May 29, 2008 - 12:40PM

    #5, JT, excellent point.

    I do, however, think that science has very real limitations, because science was developed by humans, who have very real limitations, which we seem to prove day after day. Sometimes we view science as "pure" and somehow separated from our own human flaws. A bad idea...

    Along similar lines, a Christian might conclude that God is imperfect because, even though much of the system he created is perfect, he also made us, and we are admitted fallible and highly venal creatures.


  • [8] JT from LI May 29, 2008 - 01:24PM

    #7 eva, I think your comments reflect more on the limitations of humans than science. The fact that we misuse or put too much faith in science says more about how greedy and/or naive we are.

    I am a science geek so I am biased, but I think people would be much better off if they understood more science and math. If more people understood science we might have been able to prevent global warming by forcing the government to act a long time ago. The sub-prime-mortgage mess might not have happenned if people didn't rely on the mortgage broker for explanations and could run the numbers themselves to verify whether a mortgage made sense for them.

    I think science is good, maybe even great, and we aren't always mature enough to handle it.


Leave a Comment

Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.

Your comment


* required
The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party.
 
Back to Episode