search supported by:
E-Pledge
July 06, 2008 | 70°F mist

The Leonard Lopate Show

Generation X Saves the World

Join us for a nostalgic trip back to the mid-1990s. Jeff Gordinier says that Generation Xers are better than baby boomers or the current crop of young celebrity worshippers. Gordinier is the author of X Saves the World: How Generation X Got the Shaft but Can Still Keep Everything from Sucking.

Weigh in: What do you think is good, or bad, about Generation X? Is it even fair to generalize about Gen-Xers?

Event: Jeff Gordinier will be speaking and signing books
Monday, March 31 at 7 pm
Tribeca Barnes & Noble
97 Warren Street (at Greenwich Street)


Listener Comments Comment | Refresh | Back to Episode
[1]
Posted by: Sarah
March 31, 2008 - 11:39AM
Brooklyn

I was born in 1979, and I'm REALLY glad I didn't grow up attached to a cellphone, video games, or a computer. The TV was enough!

[2]
Posted by: Maya
March 31, 2008 - 12:42PM
Brooklyn

What a great title!

[3]
Posted by: michael
March 31, 2008 - 12:43PM
manhatten

like us or not (yes i am one of them), we are designing the way everyone sees the world. How can we be stereotyped as lazy or apathetic, yet still powerful enough to change the world. their is a disconnect here.

[4]
Posted by: inquisigal
March 31, 2008 - 12:45PM
Brooklyn

How can we even still be having this "slacker" conversation? I was born in 1969, and am now 1 year short of turning 40. How could we even possibly still be using the term slacker? We all have many adult responsibilities.

But, good vs. bad: I am glad I was born with knowledge of the accomplishments of the 1960's (civil rights, great music), before technology took off, but I also am young enough to have embraced technology. I feel appreciative of this balance.

[5]
Posted by: Anne
March 31, 2008 - 12:46PM
Midtown Manhattan

Gen X ends for folks born in '77? I was born in '77 and can't say that I relate AT ALL to people born in the '60s. I relate more to the next group. (Gen Y?)

[6]
Posted by: ab
March 31, 2008 - 12:46PM

the disconnect with the reality and the put-downs are really the doing of the self-aggrandizing sanctimonious baby-boom generation

great segment. I think we (yes I am a proud Gen X'er) will continue to get our due recognition as the baby-boomers continue to go into retirement and we take over

[7]
Posted by: Chad
March 31, 2008 - 12:47PM
Bronx

How is the relationship between gen-x-ers and boomers any different from that of previous generations?

[8]
Posted by: anthony clune
March 31, 2008 - 12:48PM
Brooklyn

Gen X is taking over.

Generation Y is on deck. They are running MoveOn and writing speeches for Obama.

[9]
Posted by: al Fair
March 31, 2008 - 12:49PM
brooklyn

first of all, all discussions of generations are stupid. by definition. generations are meaningless unless maybe you're talking about astrology, or in-family generations.

second of all, gen x is -not- post vietnam. it is specifically during vietnam. i mean, what the hell? this guy is an idiot.

as for relating to people in the 60's, i was born in 78 and i do, but i think that has a lot to do with being the youngest of 4, the first of which was born in 66. that makes a big difference vs. the oldest kid being born in 78, if for no other reason than their parents are -probably- not as old as mine, you know?

and richard linklater has made some great movies, and some shit.

[10]
Posted by: al Fair
March 31, 2008 - 12:50PM
brooklyn

man, i could write more profound stuff than this guy is saying. gen x has been talking about itself for the past 20 years. what the hell is a millenial anyway?

[11]
Posted by: j
March 31, 2008 - 12:52PM
nyc

after 1987 stockmarket crash things were difficult!! you think that JUST happened?? oh wait, reagan got into office in, ummmm..1980. so the people born in 1958 and afterwards who were graduating college after reagan was 'in', the recession started then. trust me.

i have friends who were highly trained engineers who couldn't find a job because R&D was majorly starting to be cut, a we see the effects of those terrible decisions now on this country's transportation and energy infrastructure now, and oh, yeah, the healthcare [?] system while you're at it.

[12]
Posted by: John
March 31, 2008 - 12:52PM
Woodside

Leonard;

As a Gen Xer (born:1965), its clear that we are the late bloomers, who have bloomed on our own time, but in a unique, fantastic way. Also, I have always believed that GenXers have much more in common with the generation immediately before Boomers, and that we are in some ways a REACTION to the Boomers, who are so self-obsessed and hypercompetitive.

The Boomers badmouthed the generation that came before them and then the genration that came after (us) because they believe that no one who ever came before or after them could be of any impact (the Bill Clinton and George Bush generation).

[13]
Posted by: Sara Robbins
March 31, 2008 - 12:53PM
Cheyenne Wyoming....

Couldn't you basically say that Gen. x. are children whose parents were of the baby boom right? I was born in 77 and absolutely consider myself of Gen. X because of the values and lifestyle my parents imparted on me due to the fact that they were children of the baby boom... Thinkin' of Ann's comments...

Sara

[14]
Posted by: Gene
March 31, 2008 - 12:57PM

Half the "Boomers" were _not_ protesting Vietnam, fighting for civil rights, etc. They were following Phyllis Schafly, YAF, Rush Limbaugh and other far-right mavens, and resulted in the triumph of the neocons today.

Many of whom are GenX.

Certainly there are unique characteristics of generations. But these blanket characterizations are way off.

[15]
Posted by: MG
March 31, 2008 - 12:57PM
Park Slope

I think I'm a pretty good example of Gen X. Born in 1971, never had much direction, loved Nirvana and indulged in good things in the early '90s, graduated from undergrad, with a BS in biology, worked in dead-end meaningless jobs for five years before figuring out what I was going to do. Now I have my PhD and am working as a professor. I know my parents never thought THAT would happen!

[16]
Posted by: courtney
March 31, 2008 - 12:58PM
lower manhatten

I'm not sure how healthy fostering competition among generations is for anyone.

[17]
Posted by: James
March 31, 2008 - 12:59PM
New York

Yet another brainless uninformed writer babbling about a non-phenomenon. Brokaw's book was NOT about the boomers - it was about the generation that fought WW II (i.e. the parents of the boomers). Of course, it is OBVIOUS that everyone (hence every 'generation') is to some degree shaped by their time which is an aspect of their environment. But it also seems that most "young people" across generations have more in common with each other than they know or care to admit. I'm a boomer & just about everything that the current 'youth cohort' seems to babble about itself is all too familiar. Every generation of 'youth' seems doomed to repeat the same immature innanities. To this author, let me just say: come back when u'r 50-something & let's hear what u'll have to say about the ravings of the folks who will be 20-something then. Having been through 2 or 3 of these post-boomer youth waves, and recalling what we said about our generation, I've heard it all before - ad nauseum. And I guess I'm doomed to hear it at least 2 or 3 more times :(.

[18]
Posted by: Jeremy leichman
March 31, 2008 - 12:59PM
brookly

Are all gen xers liberals?

[19]
Posted by: Anne
March 31, 2008 - 12:59PM
Midtown Manhattan

@ Sara

You make a good point. Maybe I don't related to Gen. X because my parents aren't quite boomers. My mom was 12 years old for the Summer of Love. She was more in to Rod Stewart than the Beatles. So, I feel like I'm somewhat in the gap between Generations.

[20]
Posted by: anonymous
March 31, 2008 - 01:00PM
Brooklyn, NY

It is interesting that many in my age group (seniors) and those in the psychoanalytic profession are very concerned about the self-centeredness of the Gen generation.

Example: walking down the street and trying to pass a gen xer pushing a $1000 stroller or those walking three abreast and not "giving way."

The unremitting materialism of earlier generations has been surpassed by the genexers who feel that the world (and their parents) owes them everything. They are still graduating from B-school and heading to Wall Street for the big bucks.

Those in the arts, however, are turning out some great films so perhaps all is not lost.

[21]
Posted by: ab
March 31, 2008 - 01:01PM

Al Fair...look it up YOU are wrong. I was born in `72...Vietnam ended fully in `75. I was 3 when that occured

Uh...he means post-vietnam as in we were not old enough to experience the way it tore apart the country culturally in any significant way except through movies and documentaries after the fact

and #13, I agree. That's probably generally a better definition...children of baby boomers. Generally speaking...

[22]
Posted by: Anne
March 31, 2008 - 01:02PM
Midtown Manhattan

@ al Fair

I also am the oldest... My little sister is 18 years old. So, I think that's another thing that makes me relate to her generation.

[23]
Posted by: MCH
March 31, 2008 - 01:04PM
Brooklyn

I don't think it is ever fair to paint group of people with a broad brush. At the same time, we are all products of the time we grew up in and lived in. I think the generations can all learn from one another if they listen to each other and don't diminish each other's accomplishments. I think older people can have harder time listening to younger people because they think they have already been through it all, but as you can see from some of the previous comments it goes both ways. Enjoy the unique perspective of someone who grew up playing with computers, or is old enough to remember the JFK assassination or was a small child at the time of the Watergate scandal. We all have a lot to offer each other.

[24]
Posted by: MG
March 31, 2008 - 01:05PM
Park Slope

I agree w/ #20 re: self-centeredness found in recent generations. I blame the parents of the previous generation for spoiling their children....

[25]
Posted by: ab
March 31, 2008 - 01:06PM

#20

I remember as a kid hearing that the baby boomers were accused of being "self-indulgent". I hear a lot of Gen X'ers saying that about Gen Y (you can include me as one of those who say that,lol)

Perhaps every generation sees the next ones that way?

[26]
Posted by: Osiel
March 31, 2008 - 01:12PM
NJ

Gen Xers don't do nostalgia. You guys are like Al Bundy looking at his old high school football trophies. What's the word for it?....Yeah exactly.

[27]
Posted by: chestinee
March 31, 2008 - 01:12PM
Midtown

there were so-called slacker boomers too - we had a recessed economy and it was normal to go do something differet, like working in canneries in Prince Rupert or other unstructured things - I think that kind of alternative experience or break from the expected is really good for the problem solvers of teh future and so I say bravo to all so-called slackers. I think what boomers want honored is risk-taking for something greater then themselves - all the friends I had who got beat up bloody protesting the war and the other issues of the day - or forcing their colleges to divest of donors with interests in apartheid South Africa - the next generation can't see how uptight, repressed, etc. the world was before we made noise. I also wonder where all the righteous indignation has gone.

[28]
Posted by: James
March 31, 2008 - 01:14PM
New York

As an 'older person' now, I don't think I have much to learn from 'younger persons' generally, except for those who might be well read & knowledgeable about some particular subject matter about which I am uninformed. I think it's always smart to pay attention to people who know more thn I do about something in particular. Very few younger people do. And when they rattle on about stuff it's almost embarrasingly obvious. Luckily, Nature makes most of us unable to recall our youthful stupidities - else we'd all walk around forever mortified & embarressed.

[29]
Posted by: MCH
March 31, 2008 - 01:26PM
Brooklyn

Hi James:

That is my point exactly. Many people of every generation would rather rattle on and on repeating the same stuff. But if you are lucky enough to get into a substantive conversation with someone either much older or much younger you can find that there is really a different perspective because of the era that helped mold that person.

[30]
Posted by: James
March 31, 2008 - 01:45PM
New York

Well, I agree about learning from older people - I often do, but only if they are intelligent & well informed. Getting older doesn't necessaryily mean getting wiser. If someone 20 years my senior has spent the last 50 years watching sit coms & soap operas, chances are I'm not learning much there. And younger people usually haven't had time yet nor the inclination to reflect seriously on much of their own experiences let alone be interested the experience of others, so I'm not one of the sit-in-awe-at-the-feet-of-babes crowd. When we're young, we tend to be stupid. As we grow older, some of us get less so. Alas, not ALL!!!

[31]
Posted by: al
March 31, 2008 - 01:53PM
brooklyn

hey, ab, you don't have to be rude, i didn't understand his point.

still, the baby boom ended in the early 60's, which means some x'ers were 10 when it ended. that is old enough to have an understanding of war and feel it's effects without fully understanding.

now that i'm looking at wikipedia, it looks like as many people were born in 1990 as 1960, with the general births staying pretty close to that since then. there's a lot of kids up in this joint.

[32]
Posted by: MCH
March 31, 2008 - 02:05PM
Brooklyn

I don't sit in awe of babes or anyone else for that matter. I think that you can learn from people who have less life experience simply because growing up in the 80's is different from growing up in the 60's and that we can benefit from hearing that difference. Maybe it will make us all wiser.

[33]
Posted by: James
March 31, 2008 - 02:19PM
New York

By all means...sit away!

[34]
Posted by: MCH
March 31, 2008 - 02:31PM
Brooklyn

I will - as much as my aching joints will allow me :-)

[35]
Posted by: John
April 02, 2008 - 09:22PM
NYC

When Mr Gordinier starts using the word great when talking about drek like Linlater's "School of Rock", its time for Leonard to do his job and call BS. Its should be a critical give and take not an unfettered rant. Whats next, a guest singing the praises of that great prose stylist Jonathan Franzen.

[36]
Posted by: Tommy
May 05, 2008 - 12:02PM
BK

My mother-in-law was born in 59. I was born in 76. We're both Gen X?... Weird.

Leave a Comment

Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.

Your comment


* required
The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party.
 
Back to Episode

Web tools supported by
Print friendly format
supported by
Listen Live
FM 93.9 Windows 20k
MP3 32k 128k
On Air: Overnight Music
AM 820 Windows 20k
MP3 32k
On Air: BBC World Service
Shopping Online?
Start your Amazon shopping on WNYC.org and a portion of your total purchase goes to WNYC.


Audio Search

Search current and archival WNYC broadcasts. More

In The Spotlight
2008 Tony Awards
Listen to recent Leonard Lopate interviews with the nominees.
More
Winners of the New York Times Top 10 List
The New York Times recently announced their list of the 10 best books of 2007. Listen to Leonard Lopate's interviews with several of the authors.
More
2007 National Book Awards
Listen to several award winners at the 2007 National Book Awards that appeared on The Leonard Lopate Show.
More
Guest Picks
The Leonard Lopate Show asks some of their guests about the books, films, and music that move them.
More
The Camera Loves You!
Photos on flickr
Leonard Lopate lets you listen in on the best conversations in New York- now you can take a peek, too. See candid shots of Martha Wainwright, Amy Sedaris and more.
More
Shop at Amazon!
Leonard Lopate Show picks
Start your Amazon shopping on WNYC.org and a portion of your total purchase goes to WNYC.
More
Most Emailed