search supported by:
E-Pledge
July 09, 2008 | 75°F Clear sky

The Leonard Lopate Show

Liberalism in Post-Bush America

Eric Alterman says that even though “liberalism” has become something of a dirty word in American politics, most Americans are actually quite liberal when it comes to issues like health care and foreign policy. His new book is Why We're Liberals: A Political Handbook for Post-Bush America.

Event: Eric Alterman will be speaking and signing books
Monday, March 24 at 7 pm
Upper West Side Barnes & Noble
2289 Broadway (at 82nd Street)

Eric Alterman’s website


Listener Comments Comment | Refresh | Back to Episode
[1]
Posted by: Glenn
March 24, 2008 - 11:34AM
Manhattan

Your liberals and radicals all want to govern. They want to try it their way – to show that people will be happier if the power is wielded in a different way or for different purposes. But how do they know? Have they ever tried it? No, it’s merely a guess.

- B.F. Skinner, Walden Two, 1948

Liberals have good intentions. But the devil is in the details and how these 'details' move us toward totalitarian control by the few over the many. Cuba is a good example of how everyone is poor.

[2]
Posted by: Jeffrey Slott
March 24, 2008 - 12:12PM
East Elmhurst

Phil Ochs satirized "liberals" in his song "Love Me, I'm A Liberal". What definition was he working from?

[3]
Posted by: Dolores
March 24, 2008 - 12:13PM
Woodside

hey leonard,

what's with the sexist comment about the "l word" .....taking off their clothes. I'm sure there are men who watch the show to see "girl on girl' action but thank God they are not who the base of the show. As a lesbian it's nice to have a show which shows day to day life, be it perfect in L.A., of lesbians.

[4]
Posted by: Lucy Hamilton
March 24, 2008 - 12:14PM
NYC

What exactly did you mean by your comment that both liberals and lesbians remove their clothes at inappropriate times? Because the way I interpreted it was very offensive.

[5]
Posted by: Chris
March 24, 2008 - 12:16PM
NJ

So move to Alaska Mr Alterman!

[6]
Posted by: Chad Harris
March 24, 2008 - 12:17PM
Enough!

John Edwards is not a liberal. He was NOT the most progressive. Dennis Kuccinich is. John Edwards is not for single payer health care.

[7]
Posted by: robert
March 24, 2008 - 12:18PM
park slope

Liberals believe in shared risk. Whether we're talking about the military, police and fire protection, garbage collection, public schools, social security/medicare or national health care, we believe that the economy is better served when resources are pooled to cushion large and generally more vulnerable segments of the population from the fluctuations of markets. Liberalism should not be viewed as trying to make the world a fair place -- that approach will never succeed. Instead, Liberalism should be viewed as a way to add stability to an economy.

[8]
Posted by: Josh
March 24, 2008 - 12:25PM

This is dumb or at the very least anecdotal. How can Mr. Altermen say the nation is “liberal” but his Democratic Party is moving to the center or right yet he is on record going on against Ralph Nader? Yes Ralph Nader, Mr. Environment, Mr. Product Safety, Mr. Consumer Rights, Mr. Healthcare.

[9]
Posted by: Chad Harris
March 24, 2008 - 12:28PM
Enough!

This guy rocks.

[10]
Posted by: Joan
March 24, 2008 - 12:30PM
Williamsburg

I agree judicial wins for personal rights is not as favorable as a democratic win, but honestly, these are the cases where majority-rule democracy would be un-American. We are a country that values and protects INDIVIDUAL rights, and to do that, we must accept that others will have the right to live their lives outside the majority-chosen style.

I would like to see fully democratic elections, though. Electoral College takes away the individual's vote in a way I find INCREDIBLY unAmerican.

Does this make me a liberal? :) I believe so.

[11]
Posted by: Lily
March 24, 2008 - 12:31PM

Your apology for the joke referring to liberals and lesbians both removing their clothing at inappropriate times was weak! Further, your assumption that the characters on the show remove their clothes for the gratification of men is just ignorant! A show produced, written and directed by lesbians (mainly), with some lesbian actors on the show... did you ever stop to think that the characters take off their clothes for the gratification of other lesbians? Now that the show will be ending after one more season, perhaps you should have Rose Troche on the show to discuss!!!

[12]
Posted by: megan
March 24, 2008 - 12:35PM
Park Slope

In July 1997, The Village Voice published an article by Ken Silverstein, in which he called Mr. Alterman's ascension to the punditocracy "hypocritical," accusing him of such sins as summering in the Hamptons and fawning over Melanie Griffith in a piece he wrote for Vanity Fair .

"He is incredibly rude and arrogant," one intern who had worked for Mr. Alterman told The Voice . "He constantly wants to remind you that he's Eric Alterman, that he knows a lot of important people, and that you're a lowly intern."

[13]
Posted by: ellen
March 24, 2008 - 12:35PM
brooklyn

I wonder how Alterman feels about MoveOn and George Lakoff's brand of activism, specifically the "Betray Us" ad in the NYT. Do liberals need to "get tough" and play by the same nasty tactics that conservatives have been perfecting for the last 20 years or so?

[14]
Posted by: michael winslow
March 24, 2008 - 12:36PM
INWOOD

This guy is insane Nader caused the election and re-election of Bush.

NUTS!

L-Word has nudity to appeal to women who want to see women nude and men who want to see women nude!

[15]
Posted by: Shantonu Basu
March 24, 2008 - 12:37PM
Brooklyn

Liberal Patriotism.

Any way to figure out how to intelligently praise America from a liberal perspective?

Seems like an important thing to do.

Why do liberals love America? Because it's a beautiful and diverse place to live. It produced Walt Whitman and John Coltrane.

Until we liberals learn to praise America, the praise will be left to conservatives. And they will say foolish things and determine what patriotism is.

[16]
Posted by: Amy
March 24, 2008 - 12:37PM
Manhattan

I'm a little confused by the statement that many people are calling themselves progressives instead of liberals because of the way conservatives use the word "liberal." I've been calling myself progressive because I think of it as being *left* of liberal.

[17]
Posted by: Josh
March 24, 2008 - 12:38PM

EVERYONE concerned with the environment did NOT VOTE for GORE. 97,488 in Florida didn't.

[18]
Posted by: Paulo
March 24, 2008 - 12:40PM
Paterson, New Jersey

While that book Liberal Fascism practically makes me foam at the mouth in anger, Mussolini WAS initially a socialist! Until the Socialist Party in Italy kicked him out for supporting Italy's entry into World War I which the party opposed.

[19]
Posted by: Voter
March 24, 2008 - 12:40PM
Brooklyn

Leonard,

Your comment about the L Word, lesbians, and liberals was in poor taste at best and I'm surprised you continue to reference it. You and Brian have a tendency to throw in off-color humor into otherwise serious interviews doing nothing more than embarrassing your guest and discrediting yourself. Please stop!

[20]
Posted by: megan
March 24, 2008 - 12:43PM
Park Slope

ellen --

liberals having benn nasty for quite some time

just google bush and chimp

[21]
Posted by: chestinee
March 24, 2008 - 12:57PM
Midtown

Ralph Nader might be all of those things but he is also a megalomaniac whose own agenda is more important to him than the good of teh whole so he is no liberal!

[22]
Posted by: James
March 24, 2008 - 01:22PM
New York

'Liberals' have been in disfavor with many Americans for many years because of their failure to address problems which the public had a right to expect solutions to: urban crime, education system collapse & welfare dependency. Voters abandoned 'liberals' because they rightly understood them to be incapable of solving such problems. No amount of whining will alter the fact that we expect the people we elect to solve such problems & we turn them out if & when they can't, won't & don't.

And as a poltical philosophy, 'liberalism' has a long & complex intellectual & real-world political history which the author seems only modestly aware of. It sounds like the book is limited to a superficial discussion of American politics during the author's relatively brief adult lifetime, i.e. the very recent American past & consequently oblivious to the global & historic dimensions of a hugely complex subject. The author is an exponent of the uniquely American version of 'liberalism' which is actually a derivative form of statism that retains only a tenuous & limited connection to the foundational philosophy which it lays claim to.

[23]
Posted by: Paul
March 24, 2008 - 02:19PM
Congers, ny

I thought your and your guest's jokes were all perfectly OK. It is actually the mentality of the people who would criticise you for "sexism" for that, that makes me cringe.

Liberal people and conservative people have much more in common than they do with liberal and conservative politicians of the same persuasion. I think we should throw all those bums out. But thank you for your eloquent guest who spoke a lot of sense.

[24]
Posted by: chestinee
March 24, 2008 - 02:56PM
Midtown

His many, many fine qualities aside, I do think we need to send Leonard back to finishing school to learn about many things female.

[25]
Posted by: chestinee
March 24, 2008 - 03:01PM
Midtown

And Paul, it looks like you need to go with him (back to finishing school.)

[26]
Posted by: Voter
March 24, 2008 - 04:11PM
Brooklyn

It's not so much about the sexism of the comment (re the lesbian/Liberal comment) as it is thinking a listener taking offense to a rather ribald remark is somehow being overly sensitive. Should the subject of the comment (either the Liberal or the lesbian) be replaced with a Jew (or other religion), someone with autism (or other disease), or a Black guy (hey, I'm a Black guy) the comment would have been strictly off limits. Especially from the "moral authority" of and "socially superior" WNYC.

If the comment was about a Catholic priest, a toe tapping senator, or congressional pages... maybe it would have just been a Liberal being a Liberal.

I guess if enough people were offended, someone would have file a report with WNYC's ombudsman, or typed up a letter to the show's producer, the PR department, or the company's president/CEO, Laura Walker

[27]
Posted by: Josh
March 24, 2008 - 04:19PM

Grow up! You can not tell me jokes regarding the "L word" are sacrilegious. I think you are valuing your soft porn too much.

[28]
Posted by: Voter
March 24, 2008 - 04:31PM
Brooklyn

You're right Josh. In the grand scheme of daytime radio talk, the comment was rather sedate; it wasn't quite Stern or Coulter. So, you make a comment about lesbians throwing caution and their clothes to the wind, I'll go find some nappy headed hoes and neither one of us can pretend to be above the fray.

[29]
Posted by: P Ross
March 25, 2008 - 08:45PM
Florida

Thank a liberal

If no woman you know has died or been maimed in a back-alley Abortion, thank a liberal.

If you have ever used Medicare, thank a liberal.

If you've ever driven on an interstate highway, thank a liberal.

If your family benefited from the GI Bill of Rights, FHA Mortgages, and so forth, thank a liberal.

If you are not a land-owning white male, but have voted, thank a liberal.

If your workplace is safe and you are paid a living wage, including overtime; if you enjoy a 40-hour week and you are allowed to join a union to protect your rights without being lynched, thank a liberal.

If you have never suffered from an economy of massive deflation, and have never even heard of an economic phenomenon called a "panic", thank a liberal.

If you kind of like freedom of speech, and don't want the state government to be able to censor you - (you think the 14th amendment is a good idea) - thank a liberal.

In short, if you've ever enjoyed anything of the post-stone-age world, thank a liberal.

...And if not, become a conservative.

"Liberal policies made America the freest, wealthiest, most successful and most powerful nation in human history. Conservatism in power always threatens to undo that national progress, and is almost always frustrated by the innate decency and democratic instincts of the American people..." - Joe Conason

Leave a Comment

Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.

Your comment


* required
The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party.
 
Back to Episode

Web tools supported by
Print friendly format
supported by
Listen Live
FM 93.9 Windows 20k
MP3 32k
On Air: Morning Edition
AM 820 Windows 20k
MP3 32k
On Air: The Takeaway
Shopping Online?
Start your Amazon shopping on WNYC.org and a portion of your total purchase goes to WNYC.


Audio Search

Search current and archival WNYC broadcasts. More

In The Spotlight
2008 Tony Awards
Listen to recent Leonard Lopate interviews with the nominees.
More
Winners of the New York Times Top 10 List
The New York Times recently announced their list of the 10 best books of 2007. Listen to Leonard Lopate's interviews with several of the authors.
More
2007 National Book Awards
Listen to several award winners at the 2007 National Book Awards that appeared on The Leonard Lopate Show.
More
Guest Picks
The Leonard Lopate Show asks some of their guests about the books, films, and music that move them.
More
The Camera Loves You!
Photos on flickr
Leonard Lopate lets you listen in on the best conversations in New York- now you can take a peek, too. See candid shots of Martha Wainwright, Amy Sedaris and more.
More
Shop at Amazon!
Leonard Lopate Show picks
Start your Amazon shopping on WNYC.org and a portion of your total purchase goes to WNYC.
More
Most Emailed