I used to hear "Uncle Sugar" a lot as a derisive version of "Uncle Sam." But I heard it from people on the left, back when the US was supporting Central American dictatorships--you know, the ones that were authoritarian, not totalitarian.
I'm sorry but I have to disagree on the point of the who's poorer contest. If only because 1. that's the American dream, rags to riches (so don't start with the 'she's married to a millionaire' please. And 2. The Obamas came from humble beginnings, while the Romneys came from money, and voluntarily played house like students, having fun eating tuna casseroles on their ironing board, while still having those "stocks" to sell if things got really hard.
The thing that I found demeaning was that Michelle felt obliged to neglect to mention the days when she made more money than her husband and supported him, and default to "mom in chief." She's not just a mom, she's had a fantastic, lucrative career in her own right, which a lot of people aren't talking about because they want to "soften" her image.
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more.
Learn more. Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm
your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the
right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the
Comment Guidelines before
posting.
By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's
Privacy Policy and
Terms Of Use.
Sponsored
About The Leonard Lopate Show
Host Leonard Lopate lets you in on the best conversations with writers, actors, ex-presidents, dancers, scientists, comedians, historians, grammarians, curators, filmmakers, and do-it-yourself experts.
Comments [7]
Andy - comparing the Romney campaign to "Weekend at Bernie's" is dead-on.
Shout out to my fellow Shakerite in the Big City. Good stuff!
I used to hear "Uncle Sugar" a lot as a derisive version of "Uncle Sam." But I heard it from people on the left, back when the US was supporting Central American dictatorships--you know, the ones that were authoritarian, not totalitarian.
I'm sorry but I have to disagree on the point of the who's poorer contest. If only because 1. that's the American dream, rags to riches (so don't start with the 'she's married to a millionaire' please. And 2. The Obamas came from humble beginnings, while the Romneys came from money, and voluntarily played house like students, having fun eating tuna casseroles on their ironing board, while still having those "stocks" to sell if things got really hard.
The thing that I found demeaning was that Michelle felt obliged to neglect to mention the days when she made more money than her husband and supported him, and default to "mom in chief." She's not just a mom, she's had a fantastic, lucrative career in her own right, which a lot of people aren't talking about because they want to "soften" her image.
pasta and tuna? a car with a rusted hole in the door? I bet some of the homeless would love to have BOTH!
Geez I hate that I agree, but I do. Uggh
Could NOT AGREE MORE about the demeaning wives speeches. I was cringing too. Heaven help the political wife that doesn't have children.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.