Over the summer, Pulitzer Prize-winning technology journalist Julia Angwin told us about the various tracking technologies that companies secretly install on websites in order to monitor user behavior. Only six months later, these technologies have migrated outside of our hard drives and into our televisions. Today, Julia joins us along with Wall Street Journal Deputy Bureau Chief for Media and Marketing Jessica Vascellaro to discuss the newest monitoring technologies that are currently being installed in televisions. They'll also discuss the latest articles in the series: from technologies that monitor which apps you use on your cell phone to the Web's latest commodity: privacy

Comments [14]
Thanks for discussing the public-private markets for data surveillance and the digital dossier!! I hope you go on tour and tell the whole world what's happening!
@ jgarbuz
really? that's your answer? ha.
To HI from NY
Why are there so many references to Jewish subjects, such as Hebrew National? BEcause JEWS HELPED BUILD AMERICA and particularly New York, while some Muslims have tried to tear it down! DO you see the difference? When Muslims have dones as much FOR AMERICA as Jews have done over the last 350 years, then we can have more heartfelt Islamic references, Okay?
Why is it only Big Brother that is watching? Wny not Big Sister? Or Big Mother? Such anti-male sexism! :)
Why is it only Big Brother that is watching? Wny not Big Sister? Or Big Mother? Such anti-male sexism! :)
OMG hebrew national??? lenny? why do you guys push jewish/israeli stuff all the time???
What is privacy? There are many definitions for it. Jaron Lanier, the man attributed as the father of virtual reality, has said that some see it as the right to be left alone, while others think of privacy as the right to be anonymous.
I've heard in the abortion (women's basic rights) debate, that there is no "right to privacy" in the Constitution. Is this same argument being used in the discussion of tracking people's online/tv/cellphone behavior?
What is the real cost of all these services (cable, phone apps, TiVo, etc) if users' information is then sold and mined in multiple ways? Shouldn't users be the ones being paid instead of the reverse?
I knew someone who worked for a large company. He got a letter from corporate hq telling him how much money he should contribute to politicians. The letter recommended Republicans, since they are less worried about privacy.....
Is it possible to influence what products the companies actually make because of their tracking my searches? For instance, if I'm interested in alternative medicine and organic products, and if enough people are looking for similar things, will these products become more mainstream/commercially available? This could possibly raise the general public's awareness of alternative products, no?
How can they do this? It's similar to Facebook in that their customer's privacy is not a consideration. It's all about how many hands can get into my wallet, how they can sell my information to the highest bidder. It saddens me that this is the way of the future.
Wow, this is pretty outrageous! And depressing. Experian tracks and rates your credit and then uses that information to sell you more stuff. What's wrong with that picture?
I've trained Hulu to show nothing but car commercials. Love it.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.