Love may be a tricky thing, but it most certainly is not blind. Dr. Helen Fisher is author of Why Him? Why Her? and explains why we fall in love with one person and not another.
I am a Chaotic Good Cleric with a 17 Wisdom and a 13 Charisma. There are many different personality systems. I wonder what that would be in Why Him, Why Her terms?
Mar. 25 2009 07:33 AM
Score: 0/0
Mara
from East Coast Liberal
#16 Has it right! Also: Boring! Sorry, Dr. Helen Fisher, but tests like yours don't even need questions to determine type - they are so obvious that almost anyone w/an IQ knows immediately what designated slot they fit into. I really hate such mindless simplicity. It's very reductive. Fisher's test isn't saying much more than the "True Colors" system of personality testing. Her "Engager" is a "Blue". Her "Explorer is an "Orange". The "Builder is a "Gold" and the "Director" is "Green", more or less. Big deal. Same story, just now w/some fancy, hormone-related window dressing. Of course, Fisher sees herself as an "Explorer" (in other words: A Kooky, Colorful Genius!). Hint to Fisher: Your ego is showing...
Feb. 04 2009 10:38 AM
Score: 0/0
Michael
from East Village
Thank you so much for this interview. I'm a fan of David Keirsey's Temperament Sorter (I'm an INFP and probably Fisher's Negotiator) as well as psychology and health in general. Dr. Fisher's work is evidence that the mind and body are really one--not separate entities. I can't wait to read her new book. Fascinating stuff!
Feb. 03 2009 04:53 PM
Score: 0/0
FranciL
from NYC
My parents stayed together for 50+ years and they were definitely NOT a match!
Feb. 03 2009 03:11 PM
Score: 0/0
Mike
from UES
The Basic Failure of our approach to marriage is the confusion and forced sex=love mentality. They are separate feelings, needs and wants. Ignore this distinction at the peril of any long term relationship.
Feb. 03 2009 02:33 PM
Score: 0/0
Brett Carneiro
from Manhattan
I saw your special on 20/20 and I am curious how, as a scientist, you account for the fact that your subjects (couples) are drinking alcohol ob their dates? This clearly effects their decision making, mood, etc. There is no real equivalent in the natural world, so how do you rationalize this in the "experiment"?
Feb. 03 2009 12:41 PM
Score: 0/0
sw
from Bronx
Wow - this author's argument is really simplistic and reductionist. Couldn't Leonard Lopate ask some more critical questions about the methods she used and the science underlying her claims?
Feb. 03 2009 12:41 PM
Score: 0/0
rtomas
from Brooklyn
Married and having a long time affair...please address
Feb. 03 2009 12:40 PM
Score: 0/0
Alison
from Manhattan
any correlation between relationships of older siblings versus younger one?? Is that a question for this guest?? Am curious - have heard that youger sibs don't "match" well with olders. Am just separated (FINALLY) from this type of relationship - I am the younger of the siblings and my hubby was the oldest in his family... THANKS!
Feb. 03 2009 12:37 PM
Score: 0/0
Richard Johnston
from Upper West Side
It is delightful to hear a cheery, self-assured popularizer who is a scientist instead of coming from the did-you-ever-notice anecdotal school of so many opportunistic journalists. More power to the intellecuals. I presume this all applies to Why Him–Why Him and Why Her–Why Her couples.
Feb. 03 2009 12:37 PM
Score: 0/0
Ben
from Brooklyn
erich fromm is spinning in his grave
Feb. 03 2009 12:37 PM
Score: 0/0
seldon yuan
from brooklyn
do or can people change?
Feb. 03 2009 12:34 PM
Score: 0/0
Robin Williams
from Brooklyn
Has the speaker studied the Eeneagram? It is another personality test that divides people into 9 personality type. There are corresponding theories that match these types into likely romantic pairs. The system tends to be based more on nurture than nature, but sounds a lot like the 4 types that Helen Fisher is describing.
Feb. 03 2009 12:30 PM
Score: 0/0
Lazlo
from Putnam County
Are the tests available online?
And are you still gathering data?
Feb. 03 2009 12:29 PM
Score: 0/0
Kathy
from Brooklyn
Years ago on eharmony's website, I came up as, I think, an independent adventurer. I was told that they could not match me. They did not know who my type would match with.
Feb. 03 2009 12:28 PM
Score: 0/0
kiki B
from west village
I have hard time accepting her science of "4 Standard" personalities. Zodiac has 12 types, but that is not even enough to determine a personality. I think peoples' personalities are infinite- they change, they accept, adapt, etc.
I am from Michigan and never thought I would aquire that "NYC atittude" with my Midwest heart, but I have it now.
Feb. 03 2009 12:25 PM
Score: 0/0
Steve
from Greenwich Village
Not to put a damper on this conversation, but....
I once mentioned at a Manhattan Cocktail party in the 1980's that between my parents and step-parents there were 19 marriages. Conversation stopped and people stared. A New York Lawyer came to my rescue.
"Are you from a Community Property State?" he asked.
"Yes, Texas." I answered.
"In a Community Property State," he explained to the masses "property is divided at divorce. Therefore, there is no alimony."
Gasps were audible.
"If you are going to marry up. There is nothing stopping you."
The rest of the evening people wanted to know about Texas.
Feb. 03 2009 12:18 PM
Score: 0/0
David
from Manhattan
Have these tests been applied to same sex couples?
Feb. 03 2009 12:17 PM
Score: 0/0
Betty Ann
from UES
What about homosexuals? Does this translate to people looking for same-sex relationships?
Feb. 03 2009 12:17 PM
Score: 0/0
W T
from Manhattan
The tests to which the guest refers do not show reliability over time--even over rather short periods like 6 months. Psuedo-science again!
Feb. 03 2009 12:16 PM
Score: 0/0
RJ
from NJ
i am told that deodorants and antiperspirants inhibit our capability to home in to our true love. what is the truth in this?
Feb. 03 2009 12:10 PM
Score: 0/0
Joe
from Englewood, nj
Would it be more likely that persons of different races would be more likely to be a better match? Maybe due to more variation between their MHC genes?
Feb. 03 2009 11:51 AM
Score: 0/0
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more.
Learn more. Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm
your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the
right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the
Comment Guidelines before
posting.
By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's
Privacy Policy and
Terms Of Use.
Host Leonard Lopate lets you in on the best conversations with writers, actors, ex-presidents, dancers, scientists, comedians, historians, grammarians, curators, filmmakers, and do-it-yourself experts.
Comments [22]
I am a Chaotic Good Cleric with a 17 Wisdom and a 13 Charisma. There are many different personality systems. I wonder what that would be in Why Him, Why Her terms?
#16 Has it right! Also: Boring!
Sorry, Dr. Helen Fisher, but tests like yours don't even need questions to determine type - they are so obvious that almost anyone w/an IQ knows immediately what designated slot they fit into.
I really hate such mindless simplicity. It's very reductive. Fisher's test isn't saying much more than the "True Colors" system of personality testing. Her "Engager" is a "Blue". Her "Explorer is an "Orange". The "Builder is a "Gold" and the "Director" is "Green", more or less. Big deal. Same story, just now w/some fancy, hormone-related window dressing.
Of course, Fisher sees herself as an "Explorer" (in other words: A Kooky, Colorful Genius!). Hint to Fisher: Your ego is showing...
Thank you so much for this interview. I'm a fan of David Keirsey's Temperament Sorter (I'm an INFP and probably Fisher's Negotiator) as well as psychology and health in general. Dr. Fisher's work is evidence that the mind and body are really one--not separate entities. I can't wait to read her new book. Fascinating stuff!
My parents stayed together for 50+ years and they were definitely NOT a match!
The Basic Failure of our approach to marriage is the confusion and forced sex=love mentality. They are separate feelings, needs and wants. Ignore this distinction at the peril of any long term relationship.
I saw your special on 20/20 and I am curious how, as a scientist, you account for the fact that your subjects (couples) are drinking alcohol ob their dates? This clearly effects their decision making, mood, etc. There is no real equivalent in the natural world, so how do you rationalize this in the "experiment"?
Wow - this author's argument is really simplistic and reductionist. Couldn't Leonard Lopate ask some more critical questions about the methods she used and the science underlying her claims?
Married and having a long time affair...please address
any correlation between relationships of older siblings versus younger one?? Is that a question for this guest?? Am curious - have heard that youger sibs don't "match" well with olders. Am just separated (FINALLY) from this type of relationship - I am the younger of the siblings and my hubby was the oldest in his family...
THANKS!
It is delightful to hear a cheery, self-assured popularizer who is a scientist instead of coming from the did-you-ever-notice anecdotal school of so many opportunistic journalists. More power to the intellecuals. I presume this all applies to Why Him–Why Him and Why Her–Why Her couples.
erich fromm is spinning in his grave
do or can people change?
Has the speaker studied the Eeneagram? It is another personality test that divides people into 9 personality type. There are corresponding theories that match these types into likely romantic pairs. The system tends to be based more on nurture than nature, but sounds a lot like the 4 types that Helen Fisher is describing.
Are the tests available online?
And are you still gathering data?
Years ago on eharmony's website, I came up as, I think, an independent adventurer. I was told that they could not match me. They did not know who my type would match with.
I have hard time accepting her science of "4 Standard" personalities. Zodiac has 12 types, but that is not even enough to determine a personality. I think peoples' personalities are infinite- they change, they accept, adapt, etc.
I am from Michigan and never thought I would aquire that "NYC atittude" with my Midwest heart, but I have it now.
Not to put a damper on this conversation, but....
I once mentioned at a Manhattan Cocktail party in the 1980's that between my parents and step-parents there were 19 marriages. Conversation stopped and people stared. A New York Lawyer came to my rescue.
"Are you from a Community Property State?" he asked.
"Yes, Texas." I answered.
"In a Community Property State," he explained to the masses "property is divided at divorce. Therefore, there is no alimony."
Gasps were audible.
"If you are going to marry up. There is nothing stopping you."
The rest of the evening people wanted to know about Texas.
Have these tests been applied to same sex couples?
What about homosexuals? Does this translate to people looking for same-sex relationships?
The tests to which the guest refers do not show reliability over time--even over rather short periods like 6 months. Psuedo-science again!
i am told that deodorants and antiperspirants inhibit our capability to home in to our true love. what is the truth in this?
Would it be more likely that persons of different races would be more likely to be a better match? Maybe due to more variation between their MHC genes?
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.