Art Conservation as Forensic Science
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
We look at art conservation as a forensic science. Guggenheim Museum conservationist Carol Stringari recently used a severely damaged Ad Reinhardt painting, "Black Painting, 1960–66," that had been deemed all but destroyed to develop new conservation techniques! A Guggenheim exhibit, "Imageless," explores the scientific study and experimental treatment of Reinhardt’s damaged painting.
Event:
The Guggenheim is hosting a symposium for "Imageless"
Sept. 13, 10AM-5PM
Featuring forensic scientists, conservators, artists, art historians, curators, and other art and science professionals
For tickets and more information, go to Guggenheim.org

Comments [6]
Ad Reinhardt did a small version of the Black Painting for his friend and fellow Columbia alum, the writer/monk/hermit Thomas Merton
http://books.google.com/books?id=s-2Lc-g-c_sC&pg=PA331&lpg=PA331&dq=merton+%22black+painting&source=web&ots=bc8O1FSvOh&sig=bSlIIHSRF854wtolifLJjemYMVM&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=4&ct=result#PPA331,M1.
A reply to Daphne: They didn't destroy Reinhardt's painting - the piece in the exhibit that was cut up was the mock-up made by the conservators. If you listen to the interview, and watch the film carefully, you will learn that the laser treatments only removed material added by previous "restorers." All of Reinhardt's original paint is still there.
Leonard Lopate' studio voice, at times, sounds like an echo or reverberation.
This is most noticeable during the interview segment of the show.
Acoustic treatments in the interviewing area would help to alleviate this effect.
fyi
Who is Joe Zilinski, or is that an anti Polish slur?
Leonard is in his element. He's Old School. He must be friends with all these painters?
What they should have done was tested their new methods on a "dummy" Reinhardt (which they do create and initially experiment with in the exhib's accompanying film), and THEN saved the painting, rather than totally and utterly destroying it, as they did, by cutting it up and submitting it to flawed restoration methods. While I applaud their efforts in exploring these new methods, it was stupid and senseless to rip up and further deface the painting - and then exhibit it up on a rack like St. Sebastian, bearing its wounds for all the world to see.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.