wnyc.org / 93.9fm / am 820

On Demand

The Upside of High Gas Prices

Thursday, July 09, 2009

Christopher Steiner, senior staff reporter at Forbes Magazine and the author of $20 PER GALLON: How the Inevitable Rise in the Price of Gasoline Will Change Our Lives for the Better, talks about how higher gas prices will lead to sweeping changes -- many positive -- in America.


Comments

  • [1] Irvin Dawid from Palo Alto, CA July 07, 2009 - 05:47PM

    great topic - all too often, the "peak oilers" present this case as economic calamady...it's nice to see someone realize that high oil prices also have their benefits as well!


  • [2] Stephen O'Brien from Westchester July 09, 2009 - 11:11AM

    Gas prices, sure, but what about the cost of growing food which depends entirely on the price of oil and natural gas for fertilizer, pesticide, and transportation. The short spike in 2008 caused food riots around the world. And it's not going to take decades.


  • [3] Sheniqua from Bronx July 09, 2009 - 11:12AM

    Get this moron off the air. This is a ridiculous segment.


  • [4] ceolaf from brooklyn July 09, 2009 - 11:13AM

    Wow! What bad analysis.

    1) Correlation is not causality.

    2) The subway is why we have no obese people in NYC and people are moving to NYC in massive numbers? Why aren't obese people moving to NYC? He's explanations are not consistent with each other.


  • [5] frank from brooklyn July 09, 2009 - 11:13AM

    subway runs "beautifully" not this morning or any other morning...


  • [6] Andy July 09, 2009 - 11:13AM

    What about the fact that obsese people tend to die earlier than people of healthy weights, which decreases their end-of-life health care? Doesn't this mean that more obese people mean lower health care costs overall?

    Just playing devil's advocate here...


  • [7] Laura July 09, 2009 - 11:13AM

    There are plenty of people who are obese in NYC. Saying that high gas prices will make ppl happy because they won't drive and they'll have to walk everywhere and get skinny is ridiculous. Obviously the only answer is that it will help us by having a healthier environment. I can't wait until gas goes to 20 dollars a gallon and i drop down 10 dress sizes...


  • [8] Tom from DC July 09, 2009 - 11:14AM

    I'm glad someone is finally addressing the social cost of a car-only lifestyle. However, I don't think that it's just about oil, but it's about the car. If another form of cheap energy came around people would go back to a car-only lifestyle.


  • [9] Nancy from Brooklyn July 09, 2009 - 11:14AM

    Is this pseudo-expert day on WNYC?


  • [10] ceolaf from brooklyn July 09, 2009 - 11:15AM

    "There's this guy who based his dissertation on this and he's got a lot of proof." Is that what he said?

    That's his argument? There's this guy (whose name he doesn't even mention) who has proof of something (but he doesn't say of what).

    One of this show's all time low moments, sad to say. (How do I know that? Well, there's this guy...and he's got proof....)


  • [11] Josh from Astoria, NY July 09, 2009 - 11:15AM

    I disagree with the guest that all these people have seamlessly been absorbed by mass transit. I live in Astoria, and it is getting more and more crowded every year. I've lived in Astoria since 2001, and the infrastructure can't handle the influx of new people.


  • [12] Celia from Morristown July 09, 2009 - 11:16AM

    Of course if you drive less you're probably exercising more. But what about the '60's. Gas was dirt cheap and I don't remember any obesity problem!


  • [13] joe from Brooklyn July 09, 2009 - 11:16AM

    What study is Steiner citing? Looking that the study from Washington University linking gas prices to obesity, the author Charles Courtemanche, says that the rise in obesity since '79 is only 13% due to lower gas prices. The other 87% is due to factors like super-sized meals and a higher standard of living.


  • [14] anonyme July 09, 2009 - 11:16AM

    HEY!!! You have no idea waht you are saying when you say we're OK after the demise of the family farm! You just lost your credibility with me!


  • [15] Neal from Port Washington July 09, 2009 - 11:16AM

    I agree with the caller, these are just random links between statistics and events. We can make a case that as the Boston Red Sox improve their record global warming increases!

    This is nonsense!


  • [16] Maggie from New York July 09, 2009 - 11:16AM

    Hey Brian, who's your next guest, Lucifer consoling us about the shortage of brimstone?


  • [17] fat suv owner from hour from work July 09, 2009 - 11:16AM

    i'm not listening i'm not listening i'm not listening i'm not listening


  • [18] hjs from 11211 July 09, 2009 - 11:16AM

    NYC is better off than the sprawl any day of the week!!!


  • [19] antonio from park slope July 09, 2009 - 11:17AM

    Yeah! bring back the regional transit systems that existed in much of america. My Grandmother-in law used recently told me about the great trolleys that existed in Cherry hill New Jersey that was destroyed by the oil/auto companies...


  • [20] not named forbes from adsf July 09, 2009 - 11:17AM

    overpaid? Forbes? nobody makes a living wage there


  • [21] joe from Brooklyn July 09, 2009 - 11:19AM

    Wait wait... obese are not healthier BUT they do live longer.

    "Studies are finding that people who are overweight tend to live longer than people who are underweight, normal weight, or obese."

    http://www.webmd.com/diet/news/20090625/study-overweight-people-live-longer


  • [22] sorry but July 09, 2009 - 11:21AM

    yuck


  • [23] hjs from 11211 July 09, 2009 - 11:22AM

    gas is being subsidized by the government why would that stop in the future.

    Steiner is on the mark but americans are still delusional and not ready for his words.

    read also James Kunstler


  • [24] anonyme July 09, 2009 - 11:22AM

    I agree with everyone who says this is really not a great choice of guest.


  • [25] bint from manhattan July 09, 2009 - 11:23AM

    i liked what your guest said about "triggers" and how once the gas prices went over 4 dollars people freaked out. the subway is now getting a bit too high and for a while I've been considering how not to use it or to significantly cut the frequency in which i use ride the train/bus. i absolutely agree that people adapt to harsh situations a whole lot easier than one may think.


  • [26] mozo from nyc July 09, 2009 - 11:23AM

    A lot of class warfare out there. City folk who don't have cars and suburbanites who can't live without them. Still doesn't change the fact that oil is finite and will run out.

    Change will come, for better or worse.


  • [27] Andy July 09, 2009 - 11:23AM

    Joe (21): I am talking about OBESE people dying earlier than people of normal weight, not merely the overweight.


  • [28] Danny from NY July 09, 2009 - 11:23AM

    What's interesting, is the places that have the population density to support large commuter systems, are also the places that have higher stress rates (partially induced by the "commuter shuffle"), and lower life expectancies. If you compare NYC to, say, a suburb in the South of the country, you may see more obesity in the South but life expectancy is also much higher.

    So I'm not 100% sure that I agree that moving towards mass transit everywhere (while necessary for the environment and practical reasons) isn't the "healthiest" for individuals.


  • [29] thatgirlinnewyork from manhattan July 09, 2009 - 11:23AM

    okay--it's context. if this man is from chicago, i completely understand his thoughts about public transportation being a solution to higher gas prices. no other u.s. city is more crowded with cars/gridlocked, and worse-served than chicago vis a vis public transportation.


  • [30] Cheryl from Louisa Street, between Story and Chester , Kensington Brooklyn July 09, 2009 - 11:23AM

    As an eating disorder therapist my understanding is that obesity can be tracked by zip code with poverty being the most important indicater of obesity. Kelley Brownwell of Yale has documented this correlation between obesity, zip code and poverty.


  • [31] Eric from B'klyn July 09, 2009 - 11:24AM

    Brian... I urge you to think about your setting up the socially relevantand important discussion as an polarized 'either/or', 'good guy=bad-guy' issue rather than an occasion to educate people about the consequences of our founding our energy system on fossil fuels and why we need to accept the science on the impending changes.


  • [32] Matt from UWS July 09, 2009 - 11:25AM

    Is Steiner familiar with Richard Florida's article "How the Crash Will Reshape America" (The Atlantic, March 2009)? Steiner sounds like a retreading of Florida.

    BRIAN -- PLEASE ASK HIM ABOUT THIS...

    http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200903/meltdown-geography


  • [33] Maria from Brooklyn July 09, 2009 - 11:25AM

    Who at WNYC decided this guest was a good use of the limited time of this show? Even if the issue is important, can we get someone with a reasonable amount of intelligence to discuss it? Whomever decided on this guy should be fired.


  • [34] E.F. Slattery from Astoria July 09, 2009 - 11:25AM

    Ironically, the U.S. notion of expensive gas is laughable to Europeans, who pay roughly as much per liter as American do per gallon.


  • [35] hjs from 11211 July 09, 2009 - 11:25AM

    this guy is a prophet, LISTEN UP!


  • [36] anonyme July 09, 2009 - 11:26AM

    There's a huge movement on supporting locally grown food from small arms, haven't you noticed? How about the hundreds of new farms in the tri-state area - people are sick of food taht kills due to this system and market forces are definitely changing this. NYC has a great system suporting this and people have been subscribing to csas for decades


  • [37] Jay F. from manhattan July 09, 2009 - 11:28AM

    Q - How can you tell Exxon how to price their oil?

    A - How do you tell GM or banks how to run their business?


  • [38] Ed from East Village July 09, 2009 - 11:30AM

    If all of those "sprawl" people move back to the city, what happens to the price of housing close to the city? What happens to the little "affordable" housing in the city?


  • [39] hjs from 11211 July 09, 2009 - 11:40AM

    ed

    if 'they' did we would have to build bigger buildings


  • [40] Sandra from Astoria, Queens July 09, 2009 - 11:41AM

    I don't understand the hostility towards this guest.

    People left the cities in droves for suburbs and exurbs where they have to drive their gas-guzzling SUV for miles just to pick up a gallon of milk. If the price of gas continues to go up, living in those areas will no longer be viable and people will move back to the cities where there's public transportation and you have to walk more (and interact with different kinds of people--I've encountered a lot of racism in the suburbs).

    Sure the MTA has its problems (just this morning, in fact) but it is still a great system--you can get pretty much anywhere at any time of day. It just needs to be repaired and updated (Europe and Japan update their systems every few years--it's been decades since the MTA took on any major projects, the 2nd ave subway nothwithstanding).

    But I do agree with Danny #28--the pace of life in cities is pretty gruelling (especially as you get older), and I do wonder about the effects of high-stress levels on the health of urban dwellers...

    For the record, I am not an anorexic Manhattanite.


  • [41] Lisa from CT July 09, 2009 - 11:41AM

    Your guess presumes that there are just jobs to be had everywhere... uh... recession... hellllooooo!

    My husband works in Hartford, I work in NYC. We each have no choice but to commute over an hour in opposite directions because that's where the work is!


  • [42] Brick from NY July 09, 2009 - 12:16PM

    Wow. A lot of anger out there. I also don't understand hostility. Lisa- the recession will not last forever and these changes are down the road! Guest was saying that we will adapt... and we will! Welcome to human evolution.


  • [43] Tony from San Jose, CA July 09, 2009 - 12:59PM

    I agree with the comments. Correlation does not imply causation and the response of the guest with a guy got a PhD for this is not good. Has he even read (and understood) the material. Why can't he argue so as to the reasons why there is a causation?

    This seems like a case of "I am the smartest person in the room".

    Forbes you said? Remind me never to read that magazine.


  • [44] Dave from Miami, FL July 09, 2009 - 02:06PM

    Jay F,

    You can tell GM what to do because they're bankrupt and because the government effectively owns them. Exxon? Not quite... Unless you want to pull some kind of Hugo Chavez stunt.


  • [45] Willie Mays July 09, 2009 - 04:32PM

    No obese people in NYC? Goddammit New York is not Manhattan below 96th street. There are high obesity rates in the outer boroughs and many minority neighborhoods, where access to fresh food is difficult, to say the least. Guess that's the sort of journalism Forbes engages in - sweeping generalizations that turn people off a worthwhile topic, marked by shoddy data and blithe misstatements.


  • [46] but but but July 10, 2009 - 10:40AM

    willie in fairness he said manhattan only


Leave a Comment

Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.

Your comment


* required
The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party.
 
Back to Episode