wnyc.org / 93.9fm / am 820

Speaking with Feith

Friday, August 15, 2008

Douglas Feith, former undersecretary of policy at the Pentagon and author of War and Decision: Inside the Pentagon at the Dawn of the War on Terrorism, offers an insider's view on the run-up to the war in Iraq.


Comments

  • [1] Bo from Brooklyn - Prospect Heights August 15, 2008 - 10:12AM

    It is staggering that this dissembler is even allowed a forum in which to continue his pathology! His attempts to rewrite history and dismiss the rosy lead-up language is stunning. Stunning.

    This is an idealogue who is incapable of self-reflectiong, much less telling the truth.


  • [2] seth from Long Island August 15, 2008 - 10:14AM

    Hold Doug Feith's feet to the fire and stop deleting my comments


  • [3] KC from NYC August 15, 2008 - 10:23AM

    Ugh. The historical re-writing commences.


  • [4] albertine from NYC August 15, 2008 - 10:27AM

    wow I only hope someday there are indictments. I can hear the fear in his voice.


  • [5] Ralph from Bowery August 15, 2008 - 10:34AM

    Could this guy stumble and stammer any more??? He doesn't even believe what he's saying. Talk about trying to re-write history. I'm so saddened.


  • [6] Phoebe from NJ August 15, 2008 - 10:34AM

    He's gagging on his own lies. How can he sleep at night?


  • [7] veronica from manhattan August 15, 2008 - 10:35AM

    It's painful to hear this guy's self denial all over again.


  • [8] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 15, 2008 - 10:36AM

    Finally someone verbalizes the correct reason for the civil war and lincolns intent!

    Had nothing to do with Lincoln freeing the slaves!


  • [9] Pjayy from Ridgewood NJ August 15, 2008 - 10:37AM

    You can hear him a-shuckin' and a-jivin'. Unfortunately this is not surprising. Perhaps a million Iraqis dead and "we have no quarrel with the Iraqi people". The administration's motives for the war were "not to spread democracy"???? Revisionist history to the max.

    (and Yes I know this is a re-run)


  • [10] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 15, 2008 - 10:38AM

    You can call him a liar, but he is spot on about the reasons or the lack of for the Iraq war.


  • [11] Liam from Manhattan August 15, 2008 - 10:39AM

    I think I agree with Tommy Franks regarding Feith.


  • [12] hjs from 11211 August 15, 2008 - 10:41AM

    truth

    i've said that on this board (bout the slaves)and was told i did not know what i was talking about and i should read a book.


  • [13] Michael from Manhattan August 15, 2008 - 10:42AM

    THis guy is so disorganized. Feet held to the fire, in this interview I can smell the burning flesh.


  • [14] Marcelo from Pelham August 15, 2008 - 10:44AM

    I can't believe that the neocons are still given any serious consideration in the media. They have been absolutely wrong about EVERYTHING regarding this mess we're in.


  • [15] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 15, 2008 - 10:50AM

    HJS, they were wrong.


  • [16] AA from New Jersey August 15, 2008 - 12:11PM

    The vitriol is truly overpowering! Brian’s biases were clearly evident from the questioning—which I nonetheless thought did hold Feith’s “feet to the fire". I would never expect the same curiosity from Brian had the guest been someone who wrote a book that was, on balance, critical of the Bush Administration. That being said, I think it was GK Chesterton who once said something about a weak mind magnifying trifling things, much like a microscope, but not being able to see the obvious. So many of the posted comments here reflect the “Bush lied, people died” mentality of the posters—clouding even the possibility of a contrary conclusion.

    “It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.”

    -Aristotle


  • [17] Carly from east village August 15, 2008 - 01:20PM

    Well said AA

    One gets the distinct felling that the Bush/Feith

    haters couldn't are a whit about Iraq per se...

    but any excuse to foam at the mouth against republicans, for many, just can't be missed

    more reasoned discussion and less rabid venom would be welcome


  • [18] jd in ct from connecticut August 16, 2008 - 02:16PM

    Tisk Tisk. Leornard didn't call him on the pipe dream of installing Chalabi as President or, in the event of a democracy, the obvious consequences of a Shia dominated government.

    Good to give the Republican nut jobs a fair hearing, but the intellectual joust in return was missing.


  • [19] AA from New Jersey August 21, 2008 - 05:34PM

    Thanks, Carly. Obviously, "jd" didn't get the "stop foaming at the mouth" memo! By the way, jd, would you mind filling me in on who "Leornard" is and what connection he has to either Brian Lehrer or Douglas Feith? I'm glad to hear that you are magnanimous enough to allow the "Republican nut jobs a fair hearing". I agree with you that an interviewer who challenges the conclusions and premise of his guest makes for a good show. I think that Brian did just that in this interview. The comment that I made was about my perception that he is considerably less challenging if the guest has a view more in line with his own.


Leave a Comment

Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.

Your comment


* required
The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party.
 
Back to Episode