wnyc.org / 93.9fm / am 820

The Color of Change

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

How have people's ideas about race changed the political landscape for the upcoming general election? NYT magazine contributing writer Matt Bai, Ronald Walters professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland, College Park, and John McWhorter, a senior fellow with the Manhattan Institute, talk about the shift.

"Is Obama the End of Black Politics?" NYT Magazine 8/6/2008
"ObamaKids" by John McWhorter, New York Magazine 8/10/2008


Comments

  • [1] michaelw from INWOOD August 12, 2008 - 09:49AM

    There is a distinct shift in attitudes of black people in NYC.

    More enthusiasm and a sense "We've finally made some progress" or "about time".


  • [2] O from Forest Hills August 12, 2008 - 09:58AM

    I have also experienced a lot of reverse discrimination towards me for being white. It goes both ways. All races need to have some class and not take out nasty attitudes on people. It is not right if it is black to white or white to black.

    It's time to grow up and knock it off!!


  • [3] BORED August 12, 2008 - 10:03AM

    What the hell is reverse racism. isn't racism just racism. Reverse racism sounds like something patrick j Buchanan came up with.


  • [4] BORED August 12, 2008 - 10:05AM

    As a black new yorker i find it sad that other blacks would feel that they made based on Sen. Obama success. If that is what we think of as progress then we are in bad shape.


  • [5] O from Forest Hills August 12, 2008 - 10:09AM

    When I say reverse racisim I mean racism against whites. I have been discriminated against for being white by blacks. I have been treated nastily at work where I was the minority and they even admitted to it that I was mistreated because I was white.

    I was unfortunate to encounter a low-class woman whom inflicted her nastiness this morning on me on the subway.

    When I think of "racism" I think of the traditional of white against black racism. I am making the point that many white are discriminated against for being white.


  • [6] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 10:10AM

    maybe there is a shift in some parts of the country but not in most of the old confederate states.


  • [7] Steve Mark from NYC August 12, 2008 - 10:10AM

    NY Magazine has turned the "racia conversation" to near hysteria. "Coupla White Dudes Talkin' Race" sounds like a new play. Probably a comedy.


  • [8] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 10:11AM

    Traditional racism...hmmmm interesting


  • [9] Michael from Manhattan August 12, 2008 - 10:12AM

    Message to "O" Although you may have felt that you have experienced what is most likely reaction or defensive racism, (or more likely just rudeness). Our society has not reached the level of equality where "reverse racism " in any way approaches the insidiousness of "white vs other" racism. Often times claims of "reverse racism" are used by the right to silence those voices that speak the truth of the current inequalities while at the same time hoping to suppress the coming changes in demographics and power in the USA. Rudeness is rudeness. But the history of racisim , genocide and discrimination/segregation is recent and it's leagcy is still evident.


  • [10] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 10:15AM

    Rudesness is rudeness, Black is Black, white is white. There is no "reverse racism" or "race card".


  • [11] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 10:15AM

    race is the issue they talk about when they don't want to talk about class


  • [12] BORED August 12, 2008 - 10:16AM

    Is the racism that we are talking about personal racism, such as the mean woman on the train or is it institutional racism. I ask because I don't want to hear personal anecdotes about percieved racism.


  • [13] BORED August 12, 2008 - 10:17AM

    right on hjs


  • [14] O from Forest Hills August 12, 2008 - 10:19AM

    I love how because I am white it is "perceived" racism but if I was black than it is just racism.

    Mhhmm, very interesting designation. My point is made.


  • [15] Ralph August 12, 2008 - 10:19AM

    Can a male Democratic black politician be credible if he is married to a white woman? I always wondered if Barack would be married to a black woman if he was not interested in political office.

    There are black GOPers who are married to white women.


  • [16] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 10:21AM

    Use your own words "O" also, it sound like you want sympathy b/c a couple rude people mistreated you. One told you it was b/c you were white, so what. The other just didn't like you as a person sounds like, might have been having a bad day, get over it.


  • [17] BORED August 12, 2008 - 10:21AM

    @ O it is to early for this crap. Unlike you i dont make a distinction when it comes to racism. Read my comment again.


  • [18] Chicago Listener August 12, 2008 - 10:21AM

    "is he black enough?" is exactly the question that keeps black people living in oppressive conditions. [[i'm looking at you sharpe james!]]

    here in chicago, we have aldermen who are plenty "black enough," whoopin' it up for the tv cameras and raising the specter of the white boogey man, and their constituents are living in the most crime-ridden, vermin infested neighborhoods in the city.

    what people want are smart, professional EFFECTIVE politicians.


  • [19] Mike from Brooklyn August 12, 2008 - 10:21AM

    Why cant we ask critial questions to Black canidates? Why is it wrong when we request his stance on issues that are important to the Black community? Other communities do it, request a canadiates stance on issues but race is not the most important issue to them as it is to Blacks so it is not brought.


  • [20] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 10:25AM

    o

    while some at work might not like me because i'm white, how do u know the woman on the subway wasn't a low class b'tch who happens to be black. maybe she's rude to everyone.

    have you seen the way some blacks treat their kids on the subway?


  • [21] Sharon from Lima, Peru August 12, 2008 - 10:25AM

    Racism is subtle.

    If the Museum of Natural History in New York City, a museum I love, can still have the "Eyptian section" separate from the "African section" than we still have a problem.

    It is called psychology...more powerful than anything material.


  • [22] BORED August 12, 2008 - 10:26AM

    @ yes I am they spoke about those topics last thursday and monday.


  • [23] AWM from UWS August 12, 2008 - 10:26AM

    I've noticed a disturbing trend that now runs parallel to and mingles with another new more disturbing trend.

    The former is the perception that now that there are a number black people with economic wealth or political power referring to slavery, segregation or the current difficulties of many black people and acknowledging how they are related to each other is somehow "being a victim"

    The latter is the racial progress in this country has moved so rapidly in the past 40 years that white people are now often "victims" of racism.

    Don't talk about history and reality just, create and exaggerate an imagined reality?

    Remarkable...


  • [24] Michael from Manhattan August 12, 2008 - 10:27AM

    Exactly "O" it is exactly because you are from the ruling class that has been part of the historical and present institutions of racism that it is "perceived" racism. When I worked for a MAJOR Media company I happened to be in the lounge where I heard a white editor call a black astronaut a "monkey"

    I have never heard that kind of hateful speech on the part of blacks. I am a black person that looks "white" and that is why that white man who made money off or black athletes felt comfortable to say that. But as "white" looking as I am I have never heard black people do the same thing.


  • [25] BORED August 12, 2008 - 10:27AM

    O its not cool too play the "race card" LOL


  • [26] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 10:28AM

    by the way the jesse jackson path was never every successful, blacks don't have leaders and BO is not a black leader, just a leader who is black (or biracial or post racial.)


  • [27] eligit from astoria August 12, 2008 - 10:29AM

    He just NAILED it.

    thanks to your guest.

    if obama starts focusing on the shawn bell incident and related issues....he will simply lose the election. it is as simple as that.

    obama is more in touch with working class white sensibility than he is given credit for and he has finessed this whole angle pretty well.


  • [28] Chris August 12, 2008 - 10:29AM

    I'm half Indian and could easily be taken for an Arab, Pakistani, etc.

    Immediately after 9/11 a lot black people approached me on the street with a certain degree of hostility -far more overtly than anything I'd received from whites. It was as though certain black people saw this as an Us vs. Them moment -where they became a part of the American Us club.

    I remember thinking then that, no matter how much identity politics had outlived its usefulness, race in America was still a monster. If this xenophobic patriotism could be thrown on like a switch for blacks, when only weeks before 9/11 the story in the air was "driving while black.' discussions about race in America, where race always equals black, aren't relevant to modern America.


  • [29] Richard from Texas August 12, 2008 - 10:29AM

    I feel that as a white male, I am the minority in this country today. I also feel that I am discriminated against by the supposed "Equal Opportunity Employment" Act. I have seen many want ads listing "minorities preferred".


  • [30] Steve from NY, NY August 12, 2008 - 10:30AM

    There is a broadening of the agenda of black politicians, and some will win at the senate or governor or even presidential level. But we are not post-racial until skin color is as irrelevant as hair color or eye color. Given de-facto hyper-residential segregation most predominantly black districts will be represented by blacks, and white districts by whites. Indeed, that there are such districts makes the point that skin color not the same as hair or eye color. It is not even close to being the same as Irish or Italian or Jewish. In predominantly White neighborhoods, such white ethnicities

    Also, any black politician running for a majority white post (senate, governor, president) has to bend over backwards in the other direction, to not be seen as "angry", nor to be addressing issues of poverty, public education, incarceration, employment, crime, wealth and income and other inequities related to race.

    Folks like Rice, Powell and Thomas who are considered post-racial are not ELECTED to anything. They are not representative of anything except phony Republican affirmative action.

    sadly Bai's article seems to have worked hard to ignore black FEMALE politicians, both historically and currently.


  • [31] eligit from astoria August 12, 2008 - 10:32AM

    ^^

    just wanted to add:

    obama may still well lose the election PURELY because of race.

    all it takes is 5% of people to NOT report to pollsters that they, in fact, would not be able to bring themselves to vote for a black man for president of the united states....done.

    how many people are too embarrassed about their racism to not tell pollsters about it? quite a few i would guess.

    it is going to be a tense election day no matter WHAT the polls say right before hand.


  • [32] Chicago Listener August 12, 2008 - 10:32AM

    Furthermore, the end of black politics (as it has been practiced) is being brought about by the increasing diversity of the country.

    In Chicago, the old-line black politicians were ill-equipped to work with or advocate for the booming Mexican population. There is an element of racism in how they deal with Hispanics.

    There is tremendous potential to be tapped by the politician who can talk about class, who can get people pulling together. The old black politics, as it was practiced in Chicago, was about holding onto one's constituency, one's power base. And in large measure that meant keeping them poor and dependent.


  • [33] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 10:32AM

    egypt has a different history from africa.

    also egypt has always had closer links with the middle east than "black africa"


  • [34] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 10:34AM

    Richard

    maybe you should work just that much harder, u'll be just fine.


  • [35] Jeffrey Slott from East Elmhurst August 12, 2008 - 10:35AM

    Why must a "black" agenda be differentiated from an "American" agenda? Equal opportunities, equal justice, equal rigts for everyone benefits everyone. Senator Obama can emphasize that point.


  • [36] chris o from new york city August 12, 2008 - 10:37AM

    On the bright side, while the US has severe racial issues, in many ways ethnic tensions and inequality seems to be worse in most other nations.


  • [37] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 10:38AM

    AWM #24 - said white people are "victims" of racism..no, what you are hearing is what Black people have always thought of white people, it is that it is now coming out of their mouths and not just a thought.


  • [38] Robbie from New York August 12, 2008 - 10:38AM

    Nobody is a "racist." Oh, wait everybody is a "racist." How convenient.

    When people refer to racism and are not talking about institutionalized racism with its current and historic underpinnings they are either naive or uninformed about what "racism" truly is ( vs. prejudice, bigotry, etc) or are just plain lying.


  • [39] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 10:39AM

    Is Senator Obama white enough for you guys? see how stupid that sounds?


  • [40] Albertine from NYC August 12, 2008 - 10:39AM

    Is it really skin color alone that accounts for the huge numbers of black people still languishing in the inner cities and suffering disproportionately inequality?

    Could it be something more like culture, that in order to make it in America we have to sign up for the dominant White Culture, attitudes, way of life, willingness to work in the corporate world, study in schools to get jobs, etc. It looks like those black people who did do those things, made it into that acculturation process, are fitting into the system.

    There has always been a glass ceiling for people, white men included, who weren't from the right "tribe" that dominated the business (i.e. Irish-American, Italian-American, Jewish-American, WASP, Ivy League, etc)


  • [41] Tina from Manhattan August 12, 2008 - 10:39AM

    O~

    I know the experience you are speaking of, dealt with it a lot as a waiter and I just give the attitude back or ignore it. I think this is all a little off-topic, and we all know how that goes with the moderator, but I will say that I think that words are important here. I think it can be safe to say 'racism' on the part of white people and 'prejudice' on the part of black people.

    and hjs...what do you mean about the way some blacks treat their kids on the subway? I am not saying I don't agree, but want to know what you mean is all.


  • [42] AWM from UWS August 12, 2008 - 10:40AM

    #34,

    ???

    India and China have had a completely different history yet both are Asian countries.

    Egypt is on the continent of Africa.

    Throughout history there have been black people in Egypt.


  • [43] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 10:40AM

    Chris #29 - again this was reactionary, have you seen how the east indians who have taken over certain sections of brooklyn treat Black Americans? I have.


  • [44] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 10:40AM

    chris o

    maybe true but maybe just another symptom of 'american' apathy on most subjects


  • [45] O from Forest Hills August 12, 2008 - 10:42AM

    #25, Michael,

    How am I from the ruling class? I make $16/hour and I don't have health insurance. This is the first time I made more than $10/hour at a job.

    I can't stand being told by someone that is black that because I am white I don't date black men and I am a racist. Excuse me, but I dated at least 2 black men in my life, I happen to be with a white Jewish man whom is my current boyfriend because he is funny and witty and I love him, it has nothing to do with race.


  • [46] Tina from Manhattan August 12, 2008 - 10:42AM

    Good point comment 29, however I have heard Pakistani, Indian, Mexican people say THE worst things about Black people as have I heard Eastern Europeans say awful things too.


  • [47] AWM from UWS August 12, 2008 - 10:43AM

    #38,

    If you read what I wrote correctly you would see that I found white people behaving as victims or racism ironic & an exaggeration


  • [48] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 10:43AM

    Did that caller just say "nominated a black man for president"...that sums this mindset of this country up. Forget about his 100% white mother and 100% white grandparents. In the good ole USA "one drop" is still the standard.


  • [49] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 10:45AM

    $16 dollars an hour has to do with your "personal achievements or the lack of" not racism.


  • [50] O from Forest Hills August 12, 2008 - 10:47AM

    Forget the racism, prejudice issue, why is this such a big deal about Obama being part black and part white?

    Who cares!! I care about his policies and what he will do for the economy and for me.

    The media is bored and needs a crisis to get viewers and ratings. We are interested in the crisis, not the horse races. We are interested in the Outcome, not the Outlines.


  • [51] O from Forest Hills August 12, 2008 - 10:48AM

    #50, more like the economy. I have a BA and other professional certifications, we are all getting it where the sun don't shine with the bad economy.


  • [52] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 10:50AM

    O #51 - it is a big deal b/c people keep calling him BLACK, try calling him WHITE and see what happens. Stop trying to distract from what you know is true!! Jeez.


  • [53] Tina from Manhattan August 12, 2008 - 10:51AM

    O #50

    It's historic is why. Of course it's an issue because it's an issue in America, clearly.


  • [54] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 10:52AM

    awm

    russia is part of europe but in history classes it's segregated as eastern, at best on the fringe.

    egypt has had a greater impact on western civilization than say the kingdom of kaarta so it should be taught as part of western civilization.

    and there was never a majority of blacks in egypt it's always been a semitic country from my understanding


  • [55] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 10:54AM

    the truth

    that's half white to u


  • [56] O from Forest Hills August 12, 2008 - 10:56AM

    It is an issue as much as we make it one.

    If everyone does their part and treats everyone the same then there would be big change.

    We attract these problems to us, we can attract the solutions!

    Even MLK Jr. believed in the law of attraction and it's ability to overcome these problems, look at what he accomplished.

    Whatever you think is true, is true, you create your universe as you go along.


  • [57] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 10:56AM

    HJS, so it's half white when we are talking about the white half and BLACK when we are talking about the BLACK half?? G I love this!! LOL


  • [58] AWM from UWS August 12, 2008 - 10:58AM

    #55,

    I don't see the word "majority" in my response to you.

    What is behind the desire to separate Egypt from Africa? It isn't based on geographic fact but a need to emphasize a cultural distinction.

    Why is is so important to you that this point is made?


  • [59] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 11:03AM

    Same reason they won't teach our children that their lineage leads back to Royalty.


  • [60] Tina from Manhattan August 12, 2008 - 11:04AM

    I agree with you O. It is a little idealistic but it's true. Someone suggested on this board that part of the reversed-racist issue has to do with culture. I had a Black co-worker in a very open and candid conversation (I got accused of being racist by a customer in a restaurant) tell me that I have no idea what it's like to wake up everyday and look in the mirror and know you're black and that you're less than. I said, could part of the problem be that you get up everyday and tell yourself you're less than?


  • [61] Michael from Manhattan August 12, 2008 - 11:09AM

    I care about Obama being half white and half black. Its perceptions and symbols, that make a difference to the society that we will become. Race is the coming issue as the USA changes. It doesn't matter what money you make an hour or weather you have health insurance or not. I went to Columbia and I have no health insurance and no job. (but I am always asked in job interviews, or by white women about my "exotic " looks, I wonder why..?). At least you have a job "O".


  • [62] AWM from UWS August 12, 2008 - 11:12AM

    61#

    The problem there is his personal, individual insecurities which trancends race or a poor interpretation of what he was talking about on your part.

    O & Tina,

    The media dictates what the "issues" are. At the very least they decide, in the interest of earnings & profit, what type of narrative sells and will dominate fo that reason. You can't figure out the dynamics of race relations in this country by interactions with people on the train, co-workers or CNN. You have to examine history and apply it to the present, the truth is what it is.


  • [63] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 11:13AM

    AWM

    none of this is important. we will die one day and the world will still have problems

    egypt has always had a separate culture also.

    the sahara also separates egypt from africa


  • [64] Sharon from Lima, Peru August 12, 2008 - 11:13AM

    Apologizes for not being clear.

    Being taught that it is a completely different society from "Africa" is what affected me as well as my classmates in middle school.

    It is located in Africa but it felt so much like it was not apart of black civilization. Because it is such a glorified civilization it just felt a little convenient that it was that "Different" from the African history taught.


  • [65] Michael from Manhattan August 12, 2008 - 11:14AM

    I also constantly hear the williansburg /park slope / manhattan crowd tell me that Queens (my fav bourough) is too "ethnic". What does THAT mean?


  • [66] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 11:18AM

    Michael

    ethnic means not white. don't ask me why


  • [67] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 11:21AM

    #61 - that person certainly didn't mean that HE thought he was "less than", I bet you he meant they, or there perception that he was "less than". Again it is about people not knowing their origins. Every Black American should have a geneaology test.


  • [68] Michael from Manhattan August 12, 2008 - 11:22AM

    haha of COURSE I know that! its ironic as I am mostly Native American (as are 90% of the mexicans in this city) and we the original people are called "ethnic" by a group that makes up just 13% of the world's population!


  • [69] AWM from UWS August 12, 2008 - 11:24AM

    You cannot invoke the "we're all gonna die anyway" argument. There is no rebuttal to that one.

    If your geographic and cultural arguments were valid then Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya aren't African countries either.

    Africa is home to many different cultures and ethnicities, the effort to distinguish between black Africa and others is misguided. They are all Africans.


  • [70] Albertine from NYC August 12, 2008 - 11:27AM

    wow this thread is really revealing. Reality is 'racism' is a human behavior all over the world. Looking at it as black white, or any other kind of combo we have here is so so so small minded. While we are here debating and dividing ourselves into more little groups, slavery and human trafficking is growing all over the developing world in the economy that we all support with our consumer dollars.

    There are great things we've learned in this country about it, that have never been learned in other countries. In fact, there is very little impulse anywhere else in the world to even address it or try to change it.

    Will be real interesting to see how much this debate changes when the Maoists start exerting their power over this country. They don't give a damn about equality of races, but superiority of one, and they sure aren't going to be trying to use their money to fix things here.


  • [71] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 11:28AM

    *high five* AWM, you are ALL over it!


  • [72] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 11:31AM

    Albertine, that will NOT be an easy task for the maoists!


  • [73] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 11:33AM

    awn

    ur right north africa is seperate from sub-Saharan africa

    awn don't get why blacks what to claim egypt anyway.

    i done, thanks, u win. but i wish we could learn more about real africans


  • [74] Michael from Manhattan August 12, 2008 - 11:33AM

    "Maoists"? What are you talking about? or is that some subtle anti chinese snide remark?

    again as a native american the "washingtonists" haven't done us much good. AT least the "Maoists" look more familiar. In fact they usually treat me quite well.


  • [75] AWM from UWS August 12, 2008 - 11:40AM

    hjs,

    I didn't win anything, it is how it is.

    I wish more people knew about real Africans too.

    I'm not trying to "claim" Egypt, it is in Africa, isn't it?

    Frankly, I don't know why non-blacks keep trying to separate Egypt from Africa. What's the point?


  • [76] Ayanna from Brooklyn, NY August 12, 2008 - 11:40AM

    hjs (#64)

    Please go and look in an atlas. The Sahara does not separate Egypt from Africa. Egypt is in Africa. The Sahara is in Africa. The distinction is wholly artificial and an obvious attempt to put the predominantly Semitic African countries culturally "above" the Black African countries.

    As far as racism goes, I am not interested in "curing" the many peculiar anecdotes about personal slights. I know how to handle myself when I perceive personal racism at work. I am much more concerned about systemic and institutional inequalities based on race and class, which are still a MAJOR issue in this country. Obviously changing personal attitutes is part of this, but we must not lose sight of the bigger picture.

    All objective quality of life indicators (statistics, not anecdotes) show that Blacks and Latinos are much worse off than whites in America. How do we address it? That is the central question about race.


  • [77] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 11:45AM

    Excellent points Ayanna!

    I hate always being on the defensive end of the smaller issue of melanin/race when there are people living below the poverty level and starving to death, right here in this Country.


  • [78] Tina from Manhattan August 12, 2008 - 11:46AM

    AWN

    #61

    I disagree, That's EXACTLY how you determine race relations in America, by examining the individual relationships of people daily. You're a bit naive on that one.


  • [79] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 11:48AM

    AWM/Ayanna

    a better question is, if i may, why isn't more african history taught.


  • [80] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 11:49AM

    and back on point, Yes, the people's ideas about race have changed the political landscape, but that just means the candidates have to work that much harder to keep the focus on the relevant issues.


  • [81] Tina from Manhattan August 12, 2008 - 11:49AM

    AWN it's all the personal slights and individual experiences that add up to the whole. There isn't 'this thing' and then 'that thing'. They are both the same. The LA riots in '92 for example. It wasn't about 1 man, Rodney King. It was a tinder box of several slights and oppression that was ignited by that incident.


  • [82] Tina from Manhattan August 12, 2008 - 11:53AM

    hjs

    still looking for some explanation about your comment on #21 I think..."the way some blacks treat their kids on the subway".

    Ever read Spinning Into Butter, by Rebecca Gilman? It's a play.


  • [83] AWM from UWS August 12, 2008 - 11:54AM

    #79,

    Yes, I'm naive...

    So, rather than studying and having an awareness & knowledge of actual American history and applying it to the current state of American society I should decide why & how millions of people in this country behave, think and interact according to what I see on the streets of... New York?


  • [84] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 11:57AM

    lol


  • [85] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 11:57AM

    hjs, I think you are in above your head..lol OK to back off now.


  • [86] AWM from UWS August 12, 2008 - 11:58AM

    #80,

    Absolutely. A more constructive question and, given the bureaucracy and inadequacy of the overwhelmed educational system, a tough one to answer.


  • [87] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 11:59AM

    Tina

    thanks


  • [88] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 12:02PM

    the truth

    don't mind being over my head, but they aren't rearranging any museums or history books so i'm OK.

    and still want more history


  • [89] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 12:04PM

    AWM

    well, i'm sure u know, any parent can buy a book for their kids. or better stop by the library...


  • [90] AWM from UWS August 12, 2008 - 12:10PM

    hjs,

    Dare to dream. Many parents need to buy a book for themselves first. I remember deciding to go to the library on my own. Do kids do that anymore? If they did they wouldn't be able to go to the one I liked... closed.


  • [91] Tina from Manhattan August 12, 2008 - 12:16PM

    AWN

    Both. Because the history leads to the why and how of current behavior. As I was saying, it's not 'this' and 'that'. They are linked.


  • [92] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 12:16PM

    AWM

    npr had a story last week. with gas prices up libraries are cool right now. free and walkable (in some places)


  • [93] AWM from UWS August 12, 2008 - 12:22PM

    hjs,

    Hmmm... a "stay-cation?" that involves walking AND reading. This country needs more of that.


  • [94] AWM from UWS August 12, 2008 - 12:22PM

    #92,

    OK


  • [95] Jeffrey Slott from East Elmhurst August 12, 2008 - 12:42PM

    Listen kids, just because Egypt is a part of the continent that has been labelled "Africa" doesn't mean the human beings that live on the continent are all of the same background, tribe, religion, ethnicity, etc. This is not meant to disparage any person who lives in sub-saharan Africa. There were plenty of advanced city-states in that part of the continent throughout its history.


  • [96] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 12:49PM

    Yo Jeff, we covered that a few dozen posts ago! lol

    hjs, agreed but there is always hope, maybe there will be a change in the history books, maybe there will be a change to the curriculim and kids will learn African history, all of it and not just slavery...dare to dream! It's possible


  • [97] AWM from UWS August 12, 2008 - 12:50PM

    Check out #70, kid.


  • [98] hjs from 11211 August 12, 2008 - 12:52PM

    the truth

    my whole life is a dream!

    i need action!!


  • [99] the truth from Atlanta/New York August 12, 2008 - 12:56PM

    agreed!


  • [100] AWM from UWS August 12, 2008 - 01:02PM

    I wonder how many people thought the Russians were marching towards Atlanta when they saw/heard the initial reports of the conflict last week?

    Is there a poll for that?


Leave a Comment

Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.

Your comment


* required
The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party.
 
1 | 2 | Next | Back to Episode