wnyc.org / 93.9fm / am 820

On Demand

Olympic Mettle

Thursday, May 15, 2008

As China prepares for the Olympics, it must also consider its approach to the foreign press. Minky Worden, media director at Human Rights Watch and editor of China's Great Leap, and Ian Buruma, journalist, author, and professor of Democracy, Human Rights & Journalism at Bard College, discuss China's changing media strategy and other issues surrounding the games.

Event
Ian Buruma and Minky Worden are participating in a panel tomorrow at the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs. Details can be found here.


Comments

  • [1] michael winslow from INWOOD May 15, 2008 - 11:00AM

    Why did the US State Department remove China from the list of world's worst human rights violators?


  • [2] Baby from Forest Hills May 15, 2008 - 11:04AM

    Because they were paid to.


  • [3] barry from Manhattan May 15, 2008 - 11:13AM

    There is no excuse for the UN not pressing to evoke the "right to protect"

    I believe it was Daniel Shore who tried to blame the piss poor handling of the Iraq war on the lack of Will in International Community to intervene in The Burma Fiasco.

    Stop pointing fingers at Iraq and do the right thing.

    Which in this case is just override the Junta in Burma and deliver aid.


  • [4] barry from Manhattan May 15, 2008 - 11:16AM

    Another test of the UN, but guess what? China will block it.

    This will take a coalition of the willing to just do it because it is the right thing.

    Who will lead?


  • [5] barry from Manhattan May 15, 2008 - 11:18AM

    I wonder what would Obama do, or what will he do when he is President. Because you can be sure that situations like this will come up again and again.

    Who will Lead?


  • [6] barry from Manhattan May 15, 2008 - 11:19AM

    Wow! The silence it deafening

    Is it the fundraising or what?


  • [7] michael winslow from INWOOD May 15, 2008 - 11:22AM

    So what you're saying is for the UN to go into Burma with guns a blazing to make sure the Burmese government provides aid to their people?

    This is a disaster!

    So what do you say to the starving women, children and men who get killed in the collateral damage?

    Please.

    What about DARFUR? I guess everything is ok there now.

    If Burma doesn't want to help their people then their people die.

    When Bush turned his back on New Orleans would want the UN to storm the gulf coast?

    Of course not.

    So what do you do?

    You let the people of Burma riot!


  • [8] Baby from Forest Hills May 15, 2008 - 11:23AM

    Still a lot of problems in Darfur!!


  • [9] scnex from harlem May 15, 2008 - 11:28AM

    it is interesting that you here about the responsibilities of other countries, yet as a evacuee of new orleans I would have to say where was the tonnage of supplies, like water when my fellow citizens were dying? where is the international community here...

    I need not talk about the media polarizing the color line.....


  • [10] barry from Manhattan May 15, 2008 - 11:50AM

    No body died in New Orleans from lack of clean water to drink.

    I know the Feds dragged their ass on New Orleans but the fault of the poor planning falls squarley on the shoulders of the City and the State.

    Every single person knew that the day would come when the levee would break yet they were amazingly/stunningly unprepared.

    The state and city squandered and stole federal funds for years. There is a lot of corruption in the US but Louisiana is way up there,"talk about good ole boy"

    The state of Louisiana is still blocking Federal funds that belongs to home owners.


  • [11] barry from Manhattan May 15, 2008 - 11:56AM

    Guns Blazing??

    What are you talking about?

    Just drop the stuff off

    Helicopter it in from the ocean side.

    Deliver it and leave, if they want to shoot it out with well armed UN troops then blast em.

    Collateral Damage that may never happen....what about all the folk who die today because of your looking away.

    Let em riot?

    They just did that and got murdered for their trouble.

    Who will Lead?


  • [12] Gene May 15, 2008 - 11:58AM

    Other countries DID give help during Katrina. The administration refused about $800 million in medical, technical and food aid. More administration bungling.

    CREW (Citizens for responsibility and Ethics in Washington) investigated the offers of foreign aid from, among other countries and agencies, the UAE, China, Greece and Poland.

    "Of $454 million in cash that was pledged by more than 150 countries and foreign organizations, only $126 million from 40 donors was actually received. The biggest gifts were from the United Arab Emirates ($100 million); China and Bahrain ($5 million each); South Korea ($3.8 million) and Taiwan ($2 million)."

    http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=8ed6b1bc57fa11e648fee9b7d49da616


  • [13] Gene May 15, 2008 - 12:01PM

    Japan $200,000 cash and $844,000 in relief supplies, $1.5 million in private donations.

    Kuwait $400 million in oil, $100 million cash

    Maldives $25,000 cash

    Mexico Transport vehicles, 1 helicopter, ambulance and medical teams.

    Mongolia $50,000 cash

    Nepal $25,000 cash

    New Zealand $1.4 million cash, search and rescue teams

    Nigeria $1 million cash

    Norway $1.54 million in relief supplies

    Qatar $100 million cash

    Republic of Korea $30 million cash and in-kind donations

    Saudi Arabia $5 million from Aramco, $250,000 from Agfund

    Singapore 3 helicopters

    Sri Lanka $25,000 cash

    Taiwan $2 million cash, medical supplies

    Thailand Forensic experts, blankets and food

    UAE $100 million cash

    UK MREs

    Venezuela Up to $1 million

    Source: State Department


  • [14] Gene May 15, 2008 - 12:02PM

    Here's what we received from each country:

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2005-09-07-katrina-world_x.htm

    Who's giving - and what

    Foreign countries have responded generously to Hurricane Katrina. Donor nations and their contribution:

    Country Support

    Afghanistan $100,000

    Armenia $100,000

    Australia $7.6 million

    Azerbaijan $500,000

    Bahamas $50,000

    Bahrain $5 million

    Bangladesh $1 million

    Belgium Medical/logistics teams

    Canada 2 helicopters, 32-person rescue team, evacuation flights, medical supplies

    China $5.1 million cash and relief supplies

    Djibouti $50,000

    Finland Search-and-rescue team; 3 logistics specialists

    France Tents, tarps, MREs, water treatment supplies, cleaning equipment

    Gabon $500,000

    Georgia $50,000

    Germany MREs, high speed pumps, forensic experts

    Greece 2 cruise ships

    India $5 million

    Iraq $1,000,000 cash

    Ireland $1,000,000 cash

    Country Support

    Israel Tents, first-aid kits, baby formula

    Italy Generators, water pumps/purifiers, tents, med supplies


  • [15] Jon P. from Hewitt, NJ May 15, 2008 - 12:20PM

    Fact: The United states donates more money then any other country in the world. As the richest country, we could afford to give more. But at the end of the day we still give the most.

    Fact: Even though everyone considers Americans to be greedy and not caring, American citizens donate more money to charity and natural disasters then any other citizens, anywhere in the world. So much so that no other country even comes remotely close. No one can say as citizens that we should feel guilty for not giving enough.

    So how much more are we expected to give? Invade Burma? You can lead a horse to water… Unfortunately it will come down to riots. Burma has been a military ruled country since the early 60’s. Its time for the repressed citizens to take maters into their own hands. They have to be the ones to stick their heads out. It’s their country. We don’t need to support another Iraq…


  • [16] Gene May 15, 2008 - 04:05PM

    >>American citizens donate more money

    Of course, they're rich. What PERCENTAGE of income do we donate? I suspect it's on a level with the developed world.

    More important, IMHO, are those who donate their bodies, time and expertise. These probably make more of an impact, and are part of why many people like Americans, but hate our Gov.

    And strategic food/water/supplies drops might keep the beneficiaries of your tough-love around long enough _to_ protest. You can bet the military's friends are getting aid.


  • [17] Jon P. from Hewitt, NJ May 15, 2008 - 04:52PM

    Gene,

    Actually more lower income people donate money in this country then upper income people. That’s right, people worried about making ends meet and putting food on their table are the ones that give the most. Do you worry about putting food on the table and still donate time and money to a charity? Imagine that, the “people” of America actually do care contrary to what the rest of the world thinks.


  • [18] Gene May 16, 2008 - 10:22AM

    Jon, you give no source for your generalized assertions (tho you accompany them with plenty of agit-prop).

    So I don't know if we're talking about people who "donate" to help hurricane victims in other countries or "donate" to build their pastor's mega-church or what.

    And even poor people in this country are rich compared to most of the world.

    Good lord, we have FOOD. Instead of approaching our phenomenal wealth with arrogance, perhaps we could do with just an inkling of humility, and gratitude for an accident of birth.

    Nothing lasts forever.


Leave a Comment

Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.

Your comment


* required
The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party.
 
Back to Episode