search supported by:
E-Pledge
July 09, 2008 | 78°F Clear sky

The Brian Lehrer Show

Open Source Living: Interactive Democracy

We continue our discussions with media thinker Douglas Rushkoff, our Thursday weekly guest for the month of March. Today we discuss the way that both the tools of interactive media and the ethos of open source living have affected the democratic process.

Part One of "Open Source Living"
Part Two of "Open Source Living"
Doug Rushkoff's Website


Listener Comments Comment | Refresh | Back to Episode
[1]
Posted by: Derek Tutschulte
March 20, 2008 - 10:48AM
Brooklyn

Do younger people feel more enabled to get the job done? They grew up with all this cool stuff. Are they more optimistic?

[2]
Posted by: jawbone
March 20, 2008 - 10:49AM
Parsippany, NJ

I realize this is about the medium of the message, but the opening quote from Obama's speech was interesting in that he said some "could" do certain things--and his campaign had done one of those things: His campaign, per Sean Wilentz link below, had played the "race-baiting card" against the Clintons (yes, both) by saying things which were both accurate and not racist as being such a thing.

Dangerous game to play, in old media or new.

http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=aa0cd21b-0ff2-4329-88a1-69c6c268b304

[3]
Posted by: Jim
March 20, 2008 - 10:51AM
NJ

The internet does not force anyone to be any more open minded to dissenting opinions. In fact it make the segragation of the populace by political bias even more extreme through the use of RSS feeds, podcast subscribtions, blog of nothing but like minded individuals, in this way duplicating the model of mainstream media and cable news.

[4]
Posted by: Leslie
March 20, 2008 - 10:53AM
hudson, ny

It is interesting that Brian is devoting yet more time to the Rev. Wright via this discussion. Obama's speech was a moment of grace in this "talk-down-to-the-electorate" political landscape and stroke of genius as a way to respond to the firestorm. Please don't try to keep this issue alive even when your show is on other topics.

[5]
Posted by: Mark Dzula
March 20, 2008 - 10:53AM
Inwood, NYC

How do you see new media affecting education as a social/political institution? What do students need to learn to participate?

[6]
Posted by: Liz
March 20, 2008 - 10:55AM
brooklyn

How could you believe that anything a political candidate says or does is not calculated to give him every advantage and protect him from uncomfortable questions?

[7]
Posted by: Alvaro Donado
March 20, 2008 - 10:57AM
Montclair NJ

the ability to go back and review an entire speech or other item that mainstream media will "sound-bite" is an amazing tool for individuals who cherish making up their minds based on as much information as possible.

Also - the you-tube count of Obama's speech doesn't count the people that have viewed the speech in other sites like MSN.com.

[8]
Posted by: Leslie
March 20, 2008 - 10:59AM
hudson, ny

Even with the speech, Obama has not protected himself from uncomfortable questions. Quite the contrary, he has posed some uncomfortable questions and opened up a new discussion that will inevitably open himself up to uncomfortable questions. I mean, he'll have every day until between now and then end of his career to answer questions in interviews and debates. And I'm sure Brian will continue to bring it up.

[9]
Posted by: Richard Lee
March 20, 2008 - 11:00AM
The Slope

The Obama campaign posted a complete 37 min version to Youtube, and when I played it for my wife and daughter last night (all the way through, so I guess we count) the counter showed 1.7 million hits. Who are all these people with an attention of more than 5 mins?

[10]
Posted by: Mike
March 20, 2008 - 11:03AM
Park Slope

Political communication is polarized because digital information is transmitted in bits? Really?

That was a pretty useless segment.

[11]
Posted by: Jim
March 20, 2008 - 11:04AM
NJ

It is interesting Leslie wants everyone to forget Rev Wright. Leslie, I would think, is eager to have a "converstation" that Obama reference in his speech but, wants to have a on her terms, anyone not wanting to talk about what she wants to talk about need not join the

"conversation". That's facist thinking

[12]
Posted by: Jim
March 20, 2008 - 03:02PM
NJ

Leslie what Obmama said was,"I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother". Interesting that Obama couldn't get up and freely walk out of the church when Rev Wright said "inexcuable" comments. Yet, John McCain, despite years of solitary confinement and toture, would not disown his country for the chance to walk out of his prison. That's all the larger context that's needed, yo.

[13]
Posted by: Rick Eyre
March 20, 2008 - 05:28PM
Sydney, Australia

Re: the length of Youtube videos. Recently Youtube set a limit of 10 minutes for all uploaded videos, but those accounts that already had permission to upload longer videos than 10 mins are still able to do so. Including, presumably, BarackObamaDotCom.

See the Youtube FAQ

http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/topic.py?topic=10524

[14]
Posted by: Leslie
March 21, 2008 - 10:16AM
hudson, ny

Jim,

I think John McCain was heroic - there's no doubt about it. But I'll suggest again that since Jeremiah Wright has become such an issue, let's actually look at the man's sermons. We've seen a recent video but let's watch or read the entire sermon. I bet we'll find that his sermons were intellectual, emotional, radical, filled with racial pride (not anit-white sentiment), and hope.

Rev. Wright's name should not be used as just a bad word with the assumption that Obama shoud disown him. He's far more complex than that and has apparently touched many people. Let's examine him in more depth.

[Moderator's Note: Please remember to keep comments on topic to the discussion that takes place on the air. Thanks.]

[15]
Posted by: Mark VIctor
March 27, 2008 - 11:09AM
Queens

As far as our constitution goes, the Founders made it difficult to amend for a reason (2/3 of the federal legislature, 3/4 of the states). They wanted to avoid too much "open sourcing" and change without good deliberation. I would call it a "limited open source" document. We can amend our constitution, but it takes time, debate, and a lot of commitment -- a very good thing.

Leave a Comment

Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.

Your comment


* required
The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party.
 
Back to Episode

Web tools supported by
Print friendly format
supported by
Listen Live
FM 93.9 Windows 20k
MP3 32k 128k
On Air: Overnight Music
AM 820 Windows 20k
MP3 32k
On Air: The Brian Lehrer Show
Shopping Online?
Start your Amazon shopping on WNYC.org and a portion of your total purchase goes to WNYC.


Audio Search

Search current and archival WNYC broadcasts. More

In The Spotlight
YOU PRODUCE The Brian Lehrer Show
Be a listener-producer with facts, questions and people you'd like to hear on the air.
More
The Brian Lehrer Show Scrapbook
Visit the scrapbook for daily photos and miscellany from The Brian Lehrer Show.
More
Shop at Amazon!
The Brian Lehrer Show picks
Start your Amazon shopping on WNYC.org and a portion of your total purchase goes to WNYC.
More
Most Emailed