wnyc.org / 93.9fm / am 820

Go Go Gitmo!

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

Jonathan Hafetz, Counsel in the Liberty and National Security program at the Brennen Center for Justice, and David Rivkin, Attorney at Baker & Hostetler in Washington, DC and former Reagan and Bush administration official, discuss the Supreme Court's ruling on prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay.


Comments

  • [1] Salvador from València (Spain) December 04, 2007 - 11:09AM

    Excuse me, Guantanamo is a Cuba or in USA? In fact, it is The United States?


  • [2] Secreteights December 04, 2007 - 11:16AM

    David, why can't these decisions be made by ALL THREE branches of the government, not just the two political branches (not that the judicial branch is free of politicizing these issues)?


  • [3] Eric from B'klyn December 04, 2007 - 11:17AM

    This is astonishing... if the Supreme Court finds that the Executive decisions is unreviewable, what is the constitutional or legal limit on the Executive? It looks to me that it would be a de facto coronation.


  • [4] roehan December 04, 2007 - 11:23AM

    Hamdan was not a US Citizen.


  • [5] roehan December 04, 2007 - 11:24AM

    David spoke incorrectly Hamdan was not a U.S. Citizen


  • [6] Rachel from Washington Heights December 04, 2007 - 11:28AM

    The wikileaks.org website has posted a comparison of the 2003 and 2004 Guantanamo operations manuals this week, as well as the the Air Force's operations manual for extraordinary renditions.

    Check the Washington post story at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/03/AR2007120301976.html?hpid=sec-nation

    http://www.wikileaks.org


  • [7] Gail from Manhattan December 04, 2007 - 11:29AM

    Ask about two widely held misapprehensions:

    1) the provisions of the Military Comissions Act of 2006, passed by Congress at Administration's request to remedy the rights/restrictions imposed by Court in rulings on Hamdan and Hamdi, apply only to ALIEN DETAINEES. Wrong - it applies to CITIZENS as well, on home ground or elsewhere, anywhere in the world. It effectively rescinds not only Geneva bans on torture, but also - in giving gov't carte blanche to name ANYONE, AT WILL and "unlawful enemy combatant" and detain and torture them INDEFINITELY - the 4th, 5th 6th 7th and 8th Amendments in Bill of Rights. Ask Jonathan if this if fair and accurate interpretation of this new law, please

    2) Gitmo detainees and those elsewhere were "captured on battlefield" attacking US soldiers. NOT TRUE - MOST were turned in, fleeing Afghanistan when the bombing started, due to a $5000 bounty offered by US in places where annual income was $200


Leave a Comment

Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.

Your comment


* required
The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party.
 
Back to Episode