wnyc.org / 93.9fm / am 820

Proust Got There First

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

In his new book Proust Was a Neuroscientist (Houghton Mifflin, 2007) Jonah Lehrer writes about how novelists and other artists intuited knowledge about the brain that scientists are only now figuring out.

Proust Was a Neuroscientist is available for purchase at Amazon.com.


Comments

  • [1] Jeffrey Slott from East Elmhurst November 07, 2007 - 10:49AM

    And Jules Verne wrote about television a half-century before its actual invention-so what?

    Science isn't about simply coming up with facts about the world; it's about the means of understanding the world.


  • [2] hjs from 11211 November 07, 2007 - 10:50AM

    Leonardo da Vinci - a great scientist a greater artist


  • [3] Grant November 07, 2007 - 10:51AM

    This is about the Alec Baldwin comments. I didn't know quite where to post this... Are we being a little PC about the racial component of dirty neighborhoods. I've lived in different ethnic neighborhoods, and anecdotally, I've seen that the different ethicities do seem to have different standards of cleanliness. It happens to not be about just the landlords either. If you happen to be 30 feet from a trashcan, but still with throw your gnawed chicken wings on the sidewalk, that's something learned in a community. Can we really have this discussion if we're more concerned with being politically correct?


  • [4] David from upper west side November 07, 2007 - 10:51AM

    Scientists and artists are BOTH breaking past barriers of perceived knowledge.

    What hinders progress is NOT ignorance, but the illusion of knowledge.

    That is a concept that BOTH scientists and artists understand; their "starting point".


  • [5] Gabriel Reich from Richmond VA November 07, 2007 - 10:57AM

    The comment about the reduction of "truth" to only what can be atomized and quantified has some important policy implications in education. My research in historical thinking and answering multiple choice history questions (from NY's Global History Regents Exam) has lead me to question the assumption that test scores somehow reflect what we assume they reflect in an accurate way. And yet, it is these test scores that are used almost exclusively when making high-stakes decisions about kids and schools.


  • [6] Letitia Coburn, Licensed Creative Arts Therapist, from Pleasantville, NY November 07, 2007 - 11:12AM

    Jonah Lehrer's articulation of the intersection between neuroscientific and artistic "knowing" about brain functioning arrives at a seminal time in the growth of both disciplines. As a Creative Arts Therapist (Dance/Movement Therapy and Psychodrama), I applaud WNYC for bringing this author and book to our attention. Those of us who use the arts and action methods to work with trauma survivors have known for years that we must use the senses to heal memory-based trauma. Thank you for highlighting another friend's work in the healing of these injuries.


  • [7] chestine from NY November 07, 2007 - 11:37AM

    At the heart of both artistic and scientific is CURIOSITY which I find is in very short supply in the professions - my heroine among the discoverers is Emilie Conrad, author of Life on Land - through haitian prayer dance, she discovered a protocol for healing spinal chord injury artist and FEMALE!


  • [8] chestine from NY November 07, 2007 - 11:38AM

    oops at the heart of both scientific and artistic EXPLORATION is curiosity


  • [9] Mikel Frank from New Jersey November 08, 2007 - 07:35PM

    Picasso said, "Art is a lie that makes us realize the truth." I am an artist and I agree with Mr. Lehrer (the one called Jonah) that artists take their work very seriously, they do not consider it entertainment, but rather a continuous search for truth and meaning. What it means to them, how the search helps them grow as a human being and how it communicates truth to others.


  • [10] thegayrecluse from Washington Heights November 08, 2007 - 10:19PM

    The most obnoxious thing about this interview is the "surprise" expressed by the writer that artists take the search for "truth" any less seriously than a scientist. Even the most cursory examination of the artistic canon in any genre reveals the obvious truth that good art is timeless for the exact reason that good science is not, which is to say that science will always be limited by its exploration of the world of rationality, which as most of us understand on some level is only half the picture.


Leave a Comment

Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.

Your comment


* required
The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party.
 
Back to Episode