wnyc.org / 93.9fm / am 820

MSG Penalty

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Liz Shalet, employment discrimination attorney and partner at Lippman and Plesur, discusses the legal implications of the sexual harassment verdict against Madison Square Garden and Knicks coach and president Isiah Thomas.


Comments

  • [1] bk from nyc October 03, 2007 - 11:11AM

    reading the letters to the editor in todays NYT about anita hill's oped piece I made an interesting correlation between her claims against c. thomas & the MSG employee against i. thomas & MSG. a NYT letter:

    At the core of America’s effort to improve its democracy should be much needed reforms in the workplace to protect employees from the type of abuse Ms. Hill was a victim of. There is no better place to continue this effort than within the federal government.

    As a former Congressional staffer, I saw firsthand many examples where the existing laws failed to protect dedicated and competent federal employees from supervisor abuse. Ms. Hill should be proud in her endeavors, and especially her poise in rising above the fray produced by Mr. Thomas to heed the call for continued vigilance in this effort.

    Isaac Castellano

    Lexington, Ky., Oct. 2, 2007


  • [2] Tongue Untied from NYC October 03, 2007 - 11:13AM

    Let's tie this in with Thomas/Hill.


  • [3] Mike from Brooklyn October 03, 2007 - 11:14AM

    Brian, You keep saying, "If a woman files for sexual harassment" I would like to point out that not only women are sexually harassed. I am a man and I have filed for sexual harassment before.


  • [4] Adam Holland from Bay Ridge October 03, 2007 - 11:37AM

    Brian and his guest stated that Thomas and the Knicks were found guilty of sexual harassment. In fact, they were found civilly liable. Guilt requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, whereas civil liability requires proof only by a preponderance of the evidence. To use a football metaphor, that's like the difference between the 51st yardline and a touchdown. A civil case is brought by one party against another. Criminal cases are brought by the government against a party. Civil remedies generally involve a payment of cash, whereas criminal convictions could result in prison time.

    I don't believe that an attorney would really think the distinction unimportant. Maybe Brian's guest merely wished to conceal her error. Unfortunately, that resulted in a false report of a news event. That's a shame.


  • [5] chestine from NY October 03, 2007 - 12:00PM

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=UI87XMFjS5M

    Anita Hill's rebuttal on CNN


Leave a Comment

Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.

Your comment


* required
The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party.
 
Back to Episode