On Demand
MSG Penalty
Wednesday, October 03, 2007
Liz Shalet, employment discrimination attorney and partner at Lippman and Plesur, discusses the legal implications of the sexual harassment verdict against Madison Square Garden and Knicks coach and president Isiah Thomas.
- About the Brian Lehrer Show »
- Staff Bios »
- Contact Us »
- Tapes and Transcripts »
- Latest Episode »
- Show Archive »
Features & Series
Podcast
Stay up to date.
Subscribe to the Podcast
YOU PRODUCE The Brian Lehrer Show
Be a listener-producer with facts, questions and people you'd like to hear on the air.
More
The Brian Lehrer Show Scrapbook
Visit the scrapbook for daily photos and miscellany from The Brian Lehrer Show.
More
Shop at Amazon!
The Brian Lehrer Show picks
Start your Amazon shopping on WNYC.org and a portion of your total purchase goes to WNYC.
More

Comments
Refresh
reading the letters to the editor in todays NYT about anita hill's oped piece I made an interesting correlation between her claims against c. thomas & the MSG employee against i. thomas & MSG. a NYT letter:
At the core of America’s effort to improve its democracy should be much needed reforms in the workplace to protect employees from the type of abuse Ms. Hill was a victim of. There is no better place to continue this effort than within the federal government.
As a former Congressional staffer, I saw firsthand many examples where the existing laws failed to protect dedicated and competent federal employees from supervisor abuse. Ms. Hill should be proud in her endeavors, and especially her poise in rising above the fray produced by Mr. Thomas to heed the call for continued vigilance in this effort.
Isaac Castellano
Lexington, Ky., Oct. 2, 2007
•
Let's tie this in with Thomas/Hill.
Brian, You keep saying, "If a woman files for sexual harassment" I would like to point out that not only women are sexually harassed. I am a man and I have filed for sexual harassment before.
Brian and his guest stated that Thomas and the Knicks were found guilty of sexual harassment. In fact, they were found civilly liable. Guilt requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, whereas civil liability requires proof only by a preponderance of the evidence. To use a football metaphor, that's like the difference between the 51st yardline and a touchdown. A civil case is brought by one party against another. Criminal cases are brought by the government against a party. Civil remedies generally involve a payment of cash, whereas criminal convictions could result in prison time.
I don't believe that an attorney would really think the distinction unimportant. Maybe Brian's guest merely wished to conceal her error. Unfortunately, that resulted in a false report of a news event. That's a shame.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=UI87XMFjS5M
Anita Hill's rebuttal on CNN
Leave a Comment
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Back to EpisodeEmail addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.