On Demand
Wireless Neutrality
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Siva Vaidhyanathan, associate professor of media studies and law at the University of Virginia, explains how Verizon banned the abortion rights group, Naral, from using their text messaging services, and then decided to reverse their decision.
- About the Brian Lehrer Show »
- Staff Bios »
- Contact UsĀ »
- Tapes and Transcripts »
- Latest Episode »
- Show Archive »
Features & Series
Podcast
Stay up to date.
Subscribe to the Podcast
YOU PRODUCE The Brian Lehrer Show
Be a listener-producer with facts, questions and people you'd like to hear on the air.
More
The Brian Lehrer Show Scrapbook
Visit the scrapbook for daily photos and miscellany from The Brian Lehrer Show.
More
Shop at Amazon!
The Brian Lehrer Show picks
Start your Amazon shopping on WNYC.org and a portion of your total purchase goes to WNYC.
More

Comments
Refresh
i found out that Verizon also donates to the Discovery Institute, although when I wrote to them, they claim that none of the money was for the "intelligent design" part of that institutes agenda. accountability and bookeeping, anybody?
this actually sounds like a free speech issue - what's next, getting my phone calls monitored..oh, wait..are they monitoring me typing this too?..oh crap!..
I disagree with your guest's position because the recipients of Naral's messages have Opted-In to receive these messages--perhaps your guest should read the MMA's Code of Conduct/Guidelines of which Verizon is a member (http://mmaglobal.com/modules/article/view.article.php/1220)
Moreover, how is a text message sent to opt-in subscribers any different than calling them? It is still communication between the same parties communicating the same information. Regardless of whether Verizon likes the topic of conversation, it has no right to prohibit the communication UNLESS the recipients complain about the messages.
Carriers claim their networks are private and different than the Internet, yet their real fear is the very commoditization of their services akin to the Internet.
They want it both ways: "our networks are private, therefore we can control what goes over them" yet a Verizon customer can call or send messages to a Sprint subscriber because of interconnection agreements with other carriers --- the same model as the Internet. If Naral changes to T-Mobile, will Verizon try to block its messsages coming from T-Mobile's network???
This is a ridiculous, politically-driven case and your guest is right---it probably won't garner too many fans and will maybe even cost Verizon some customers.
HA! guess Verizon must've just read my post and reversed their decision pronto! :)
Oh! I hope I did not say that I thought Verizon was right to censor NARAL!
I was merely analyzing the legal situation.
Leave a Comment
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Back to EpisodeEmail addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.