On Demand
Immigration Roundtable
Monday, May 21, 2007
Ruben Navarrette, Jr., syndicated columnist with the Washington Post Group, Chung Wha Hong, executive director of the New York Immigration Coalition and Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, debate the pros and cons of the proposed Senate immigration bill.
- About the Brian Lehrer Show »
- Staff Bios »
- Contact Us »
- Tapes and Transcripts »
- Latest Episode »
- Show Archive »
Features & Series
Podcast
Stay up to date.
Subscribe to the Podcast
YOU PRODUCE The Brian Lehrer Show
Be a listener-producer with facts, questions and people you'd like to hear on the air.
More
The Brian Lehrer Show Scrapbook
Visit the scrapbook for daily photos and miscellany from The Brian Lehrer Show.
More
Shop at Amazon!
The Brian Lehrer Show picks
Start your Amazon shopping on WNYC.org and a portion of your total purchase goes to WNYC.
More

Comments
Refresh
Hi Brian,
I’m a Canadian citizen with a TN visa. I believe the immigration debate unjustly focuses too strongly on the “illegal” immigrants although it is an important issue.
I received my degree from an American University (paid for it out of my pocket by working at least 3 part time jobs each semester). What about people in my shoes, it’s almost impossible to obtain an H-1 visa not to mention a green card, which I strongly desire. Thanks!
Alex
I am a US born citizen married to an illegal immigrant. He was brought to this country illegally by his parents as a small child. We have tried everything to get his legal status but it has become legally impossible (we met and married after the law change in April 2001). This whole debate is incredibly frustrating, especially for a population of illegal immigrants who had no say in coming to this country illegally. What was he suppose to do at the age of 8? Tell his parents "wait, I can't go with you because that's illegal!"
My husband speaks perfect English, has earned a college degree and yet cannot work legally even though he would be a productive member of this society. Now that's a waste of American resources.
Brian, I encourage you to look not just at "amnesty" but the even more controversial term "illegal alien." Like the term "amnesty", the term "illegal alien" enters the lexicon in very particular ways and follow a very specific path. In the case of both terms, they follow the path of multimillionaire eugencist John Tanton. Southern Poverty Law Center & others have reported extensively on his funding of Krikorian's and other organizations that researched and then deployed the such terms. See, for example:
http://wwwww.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/intrep.jsp?iid=7
I'd look into the etymology and desirability of of both "amnesty" and "illegal alien". They don;t enter the language ex nihilo; they enter the language thanks to people, some of whom are rich, racist and increasingly dangerous.
Thanks,
R
I have been hearing about illegal immigrants here in the US, but i was wondering, what about those college students, who came to the US to further their education, and they do not have any criminal background. They are in good status, graduated and still continuing with higher education i.e Master & Doctorate, what are you going to do to them? Are they going to be given work permits too? Are they going to be able to apply for the permanent residency? Do you even call them illegal immigrants? Please help me with the feedback. Thank you so much!
Leave a Comment
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Back to EpisodeEmail addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.