Deconstructive epistemology means; analysing and showing te universal pragmatistics of x and y as universaly stated the origin and the development of accquired characteristics.

Because, those charactheristics and, their working order is inhuman and unhuman.

Therefore, deconstructive epistemology is to show the problem of universal pragmatistics how they work, and instead of scientific knowledge, why human beings are conflicting, fighting each other with metaphysical (ontological/theological/teleological) ideolojies, their beliefs and ethical values
If one acknowledges and have the awareness of inhuman and un human construction, as a member of human being; then it is time time have human conscious, rather than man kind.

Because my idea of deconstruct the man kind construction sto reach the level of being human, by acknowledging non inhumane and non unhumane thinking, behaviour and systemazing as man kind and not as human being.

Fascinating observation that without an accepted religious authority, epistemological arguments are making their way into American politics.

Also I think the common usage of Hitler as as an analog is a sign of how destructive anger is in our public discourse. Anger views its subject as intrinsically bad and Hitler feels like a safe example of someone intrinsically bad, hence the comparison. Once we view someone as intrinsically bad where can we go from there? That is why despite all the politeness and swapping of platitudes our politics are going nowhere.

Great guest!!

Godwin's Law isn't just for internet forums. If an argument goes on long enough, someone will eventually be compared to Hitler.