30 Issues: Management Styles and Decision Making
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Julian Zelizer, professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University and co-editor of Rightward Bound: Making America Conservative in the 1970s, looks at how presidents' management styles say about their effectiveness as leaders.
Then
David Hawkings, managing editor of CQ Weekly, discusses McCain's management style, and David Mendell, a former reporter for the Chicago Tribune and author of Obama: From Promise to Power, talks about Barack Obama's management style.
Then
Lisa Chamberlain, author of Slackonomics: Generation X in the Age of Creative Destruction, looks at the generational differences between Barack Obama and John McCain.
Then
David Hawkings, managing editor of CQ Weekly, discusses McCain's management style, and David Mendell, a former reporter for the Chicago Tribune and author of Obama: From Promise to Power, talks about Barack Obama's management style.
Then
Lisa Chamberlain, author of Slackonomics: Generation X in the Age of Creative Destruction, looks at the generational differences between Barack Obama and John McCain.
Comments [35]
As many prominent experts have noted, Obama is a member of Generation Jones–born 1954-1965, between the Boomers and GenXers.
Here is a column by Clarence Page about GenJones in last week’s Chicago Tribune: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-oped1022pageoct22,0,2775732.column
And this new 5 minute GenJones video features many top pundits (including David Brooks, Clarence Page, Dick Morris, Juan Williams, Karen Tumulty, Howard Wolfson, Michael Barone, etc.) specifically talking about Obama (and Palin’s) membership in Generation Jones, as well as the surprisingly big role that GenJones is now playing in this election: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ta_Du5K0jk
I've always thought the label "boomer" was kind of a misnomer - how do you lump someone eligible for the draft before the Gulf of Tonkin with someone too young to vote until 1984? To me, a Generation Xer born in 1968 (or, to use Bret Easton Ellis' term, "Atari Generation"), I always thought the term "boomer" should be reserved for 1946-1956 births.
I don't think Obama is "post boomer," regardless of what he says. I think he is distinctly "Late Boomer," a sort of lost generation between the hard-core boomers born in the 40s and 50s and the GenXers who were born later in the 60s. We are a generation who were too young for Howdy Doody, but just a bit too old for Sesame Street...which makes all the difference in your world view!
"silent generation"??. emblematized by such quietists and conformists as bob dylan, muhammad ali, etc., etc. think you need to rethink this rubric?
Hi Brian-
I guess these things are somewhat fluid, but I'm a bit younger than Obama, and I consider myself the last of the Boomer generation-- which I've always heard is considered 1946 to 1964. I agree that by the time we graduated, it was Michael Jackson, but I grew up with the Beatles and singing "If I had a hammer" with the kids in the neighborhood, whom I greeted with a peace sign and saying, "Peace." I didn't use a computer until a couple of years into college and I thought it was much more difficult than my typewriter.
Someone should note that gen X was first Billy Idol's band. It's that stupid an idea: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X_(band)
I am hearing Lisa Chamberlain comment's and I was under the impression that baby boomers are those born up until 1964 - please clarify.
Is "Maverick-y" a word?? Or, a Tina Fey-ism?
Can someone explain the upper boundary of "gen X"? It's post boomer, but when does it end?
Technically, Sen. Obama is a Baby Boomer. The Baby Boom ended in 1963.
The Baby Boom goes until 1964. Obama, like me, is what I like to call a "late boomer".
McCain's management style may work in the military context, where people have to follow your orders even if you alienate them. I'm not so sure it'd work in the civilian executive context.
don't forget DEVO was a big hit when Obama graduated high school too! and all the new wave movement people, Sting and the Police,
Sen. Obama is simply unqualified to be President of our United States. He’s one-term senator with absolutely NO executive, business or military experience.
Casting votes is not decision-making. With a vote you are one of many. As executive you make the close decisions alone – and they are often irrevocable.
You don’t get to vote “present” or have David Axlerod make decisions for you.
@18 Nicholas
For privacy reasons, I disagree with you. We must learn what we can without those records...otherwise it is a slippery slope with no bottom.
I must confess, I have a similar interest in Obama's UNRELEASED records. Given the co-morbidity of smoking and depression, and given that we know that Obama does smoke and has used controlled substances...it would be interesting to know the details of this.
His "style" is one reason why he would not be a good president.
Some decisions he wouldn't be able to change.
If Obama keeps with his same pattern, about 3 months after taking office he will start running for World President, then once he gets that post he will run for Head of the Solar System.
Meanwhile Biden will be left running the US while Obama campaigns for the next big thing.
If,..if, he keeps with the same pattern
#8
That's because he's black.. the same could be said about his race against McCain: even if people don't think much about McCain, even if Obama's outspending him by whatever margins, even if one appears to be considerably smarter than the other.. it's still a race considered close by many.
My greatest concerns about the next president is what they will not release to the public.
John McCain has refused to releasse his mental health records to the public, and there is probably no more inportant information about a presidential candidate that the public needs to know before making a decision on who will be making the most important decisions for this nation.
I am of the generation that sent people to serve in Vietnam and I do not know a single person who served there who did not come back changed, and more often than not, there were many adverse changes to these people.
We can remember presidential campaigns in the last few`decades where mere treatment for depression was considered enough to effect the election. Senator Thomas Eagleton , a Vice Presidential nominee wha had been treated for depression had this effect the election, and also revelations that Michael Dukakis had been treated for depression also had an adverse effect on his election campaign, yet John McCain, who was a prisoner of war in Hanoi for years, somehow is merely allowed to assert that he suffered no ill effects psychologically from his imprisonment has not been considered a critical element in this campaign.
All I know is that I beleive that the American people are entitled to know what is in that report before electing him to the office of the presidency.
OODA
Is the methodology used to train fighter pilots:
Observe
Orient
Decide
Act
That is McCain.
On the flip side of the coin: An oft-used term used to describe overly analytical people is "analysis paralysis". Obama.
[[BL Moderator Writes: A few comments have been removed for violating the WNYC posting policy. Please, remember to stay on topic to the discussion on the air, and civil. Thanks.]]
How is Biden some kind of counter weight? Much less a guy who will challenge Obama's ideas.
Joe Biden is way way to the left of Obama.
He picked Joe because he was pretty safe and would not piss off the far left.
You are forgetting Obama's role as a professor as an example of his executive experience. There was a great article in the New Yorker recently interviewing his former students.
Can the guests touch on how the way the candidates have run and organized their campaigns might indicate how they would manage their presidencies?
Obama spent $5.3 million dollars on that phony Greek temple!
What "bridges to nowhere" come next?
Hi Brian--
Regarding Senators having no management experience: surely they manage their Senate office?
I totally agree: Obama's "sprezzatura" is straight from the book.. oh wait, am I sounding like liberal elite?
@6 Lorenzo
...not so fast; they say he has spent ONE HALF BILLION DOLLARS so far
and, if you stumble around here and read the comments, people don't think much of McCain
outspent Hillary 4 to 1 in states she won.
;)
Obama in many ways reminds me of certain athletes like Joe DiMaggio, who made things look easy.
There is a calm about this guy where he doesn't look like he is working hard. Even though he is working hard.
Whereas McCain looks like a grunt that is constantly struggling to get something done.
How important is making something look easy or effortless in one's management style?
There's ONE thing to go by .. which is rarely accounted for: the incredibly well managed, disciplined, coordinated campaign that Obama has run.
what do your guests think of the sophisticated and indeed patented decision making processes, marketed today by most major consulting firms?
the ones with which i am familiar would have saved us from lots of recent mistakes. For example, they all would have supported man's link to "global warming" (advising to err on the conservative side rather than choosing risk as the US did).
I heard at Obama has actually told his staffers that he didn't want to see any infighting within the campaign, "zero drama policy." It seems rather successful as we have seen very few leaks from his campaign. How is that maintained under the stress of a large campaign?
How did the US withdrawal from Vietnam influence McCain's view of military involvement abroad now- specifically in Iraq and Afghanistan. But perhaps more widely in the manner he may wield the use of military power?
"most liberal?" Please. We haven't seen "liberal" in ages.
At a rally in Cleveland, Ohio Senator John McCain said an Obama presidency could be dangerous.
Sen. McCain: “Do you want to keep invested in your future or do you want to have it taken by the most liberal person ever run for the presidency and the Democratic leaders most liberal, who have been running Congress for the past 2 years (House Speaker) Nancy Pelosi and (Senate Majority Leader) Harry Reid. You know my friends, this is a dangerous threesome.”
And there are those who feel this country would be in better shape with a demogogue like McCain?
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.