It’s our series leading up to the New York, New Jersey and Connecticut primaries – and about 20 others on “Super Duper Tuesday”, February 5th. It’s peer-to-peer democracy, as we all help each other figure out who to vote for in the Democratic and Republican votes.
I overheard a really random but appalling comment on the subway the other day: someone said he was all for John Edwards, but wouldn't vote for him because (quote) in all likelihood he would be widowed while in office and not much use to the country.
My jaw was on the floor. I mean, my God!
Jan. 03 2008 10:55 AM
Score: 0/0
John Lumea
from Brooklyn
Assuming that what Richardson and Biden really want is State, it is perfectly reasonable for them to instruct their supporters to caucus for Obama in places where they are not viable -- even though the assumption long has been that Clinton would be the more natural fit for them.
Word on the street is that, if Clinton wins the general election, Richard Holbrooke has a lock on State.
Holbrooke has been one of Clinton's chief behind-the-scenes arm twisters, all year long -- leaning VERY hard on those in the Democratic establishment, to lock in their early support for Clinton.
Richardson and Biden may know that State simply is not available under Clinton.
Jan. 03 2008 10:55 AM
Score: 0/0
t kramer
from Manhatto
Ma choix serait Madame Clinton, si ma premier choix Richardson ne obtient pas assez soutien
Jan. 03 2008 10:49 AM
Score: 0/0
Levine.Jj
That he took a stand on Darfur, a most brave and noble act... Talk about character...That's character; that's spending political capital wisely.
Despite mistakes overseas (N. Korea not going very well!) and at home (Wen Ho Lee!) he would get my vote.
Jan. 03 2008 10:35 AM
Score: 0/0
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more.
Learn more. Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm
your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the
right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the
Comment Guidelines before
posting.
By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's
Privacy Policy and
Terms Of Use.
Comments [4]
I overheard a really random but appalling comment on the subway the other day: someone said he was all for John Edwards, but wouldn't vote for him because (quote) in all likelihood he would be widowed while in office and not much use to the country.
My jaw was on the floor. I mean, my God!
Assuming that what Richardson and Biden really want is State, it is perfectly reasonable for them to instruct their supporters to caucus for Obama in places where they are not viable -- even though the assumption long has been that Clinton would be the more natural fit for them.
Word on the street is that, if Clinton wins the general election, Richard Holbrooke has a lock on State.
Holbrooke has been one of Clinton's chief behind-the-scenes arm twisters, all year long -- leaning VERY hard on those in the Democratic establishment, to lock in their early support for Clinton.
Richardson and Biden may know that State simply is not available under Clinton.
Ma choix serait Madame Clinton, si ma premier choix Richardson ne obtient pas assez soutien
That he took a stand on Darfur, a most brave and noble act... Talk about character...That's character; that's spending political capital wisely.
Despite mistakes overseas (N. Korea not going very well!) and at home (Wen Ho Lee!) he would get my vote.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.