This is not a pure democracy, and it was never intended to be. We have a Bill of Rights and a Constitution for a reason. These are to guarantee rights for ALL citizens...whether you like it or NOT.
As a black man, I find the suggestion that ANY group's equal rights should be subject to a vote or referrendum to be highly offensive and not so subtly remnicent of how my people were treated (and still are).
Equal rights for all supercede majority rule.
e.i.COBRA: Your guest gave out wrong information to the man in the Bronx (from Calif.) saying that CIGNA is not responsible for helping with COBRA. I had a very similar problem getting my son COBRA, 1 year of letter writing, telephone calls to CIGNA, until I hired an attorney, and I quote from the letter that changed CINGA's corp. mind "I want to say that there is implicit in ERISA (law governing COBRA) a requirement that the fiduciaries of the plan operate it in a fair manner, and that they communicate information about the participants' right and obligations that is comprehensive and accurate, in a manner calculated to permit those participants to protect their rights." The attorney then quoted a case law. Please, if you can help that gentleman and contact him with this information. E.O'K. K.
I had a boss once who handed out phony awards at our annual Christmas party. He made Michael Scott ( of the Tv show The Office) look like Ghandi. I won the "Weight Watchers" award. 'Nuff said.
It's sad to see these 3 Democrats have not learned anything from Obama's leadership or the recent economic meltdown. The decision from state govt affects us all - Democrats, Republicans, gays, non-gays, Latinos, non-Lations, you name it. The power of democracy is: the voters who're aware of their petty, power-mongering maneuvers can vote them out. I certainly will if they represent my district and nominate/vote for someone who is mature, disciplined, intelligent, compassionate, a problem-solver and not a problem-creator.
#9, KC from Washington Heights, Another tact is taking a tougher stance on illegal immigration and supporting ICE, outing illegal occupancy/crowding in rent controlled and rent stabilized apartments, report immigration fraud and sham marriages, and reinforce labor laws and publically embarrass companies employing illegal immigrants. Fight bigotry and hatred in kind, only you’ll have the law on your side.
It's not about personal convictions, it's about the constitution. A ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional, and any politician's personal religious convictions or the religious convictions of his constituents do not matter, or should not, under the founding laws of our country. It's time to return to the separation of church and state that is the reason for our existence. "I'm a Christian" is not a valid response from a politician to the question of Gay marriage.
What is the process by which we might recall these three rebels?
Major slip by one of Brian's guests. He said that the democrats will have a big push to end rent control. He actually means that there will be a big push to end "vacancy de-control" which allows rent-stabilized apartments to be turned into market rate units without protections. This is part of the Real Rent Reform campaign, which would strengthen our rent laws, and which many think is the most important set of laws that will face the legislature this coming session.
Voters like me helped elect Democrats for a purpose: to further the party's traditional ideals of equality and justice. If they're going to bargain away those ideals to take power, then what was the point?
If the Democrats are going to act like bigoted faux Republicans, we might as well have stuck with the real Republicans.
I'm wondering if this will lead to a short-lived Senate Democratic majority. Remember that the last time Democrats got control of the state Senate in 1964, there was a long deadlock, lasting until the end of January 1965 when Mayor Wagner struck a deal with Governor Rockefeller.
Left a sour taste in everyone's mouth and Zaretzki's hold crumbled within a year.
Boy can she spin, she should work for CNN.
Where to begin… Politicians holding control of the state senate hostage for personal advancement and to enshrine bigotry; classic New York. Bigotry coming from minority and first or second generation immigrant group claiming they deserve more visibility and are the true voice of American ideals… Classic New York. (Think me making that comment is bigoted? Look at the stances of the Catholic and Anglican churches in South America and Africa and the influence they are trying to have in the United States.) Spineless Democrats; classic New York. Nothing getting accomplished because egos matter more than the people… Again, classic New York.
Maybe we gay folks should decide that political cooperation with latinos is untenable and we should do all we can to deny latinos gaining leadership positions in Albany.
What are the odds that we Malcolm Smith will bring the issue to the floor for a vote?
I admit that the Gang of Three seems pretty sleezy to me, but couldn't you argue that this is actually a step towards a more democratic system of government in the state? After all, the Three-Men-in-a-Room model is awful and totally undemocratic. Isn't this putting more power in the hands of the rank and file, where it belongs?
Under-representation of Latinos in leadership? I think not and unfortunately most of those who have made it to the leadership like Rubin Diaz and sleaze or just plain corrupt and thugs. And I can name names if you like. This is a mess and that's because the Democratic Party doesn't put their foot down on these people and not support them.
Isn't this what ya get after years of "3 Men in a Room"? Is this the only way for the rank and file to do anything that matters? If the conductors will not stop the train, the only thing left is to stick it up.
I find it interesting that liberals like democracy when it goes their way. But if a vote By The People produces a result that liberals don’t like--such as a ban on gay marriage--liberals look to force their will on The People via an undemocratic court rulings, often using bogus arguments like “it’s a civil rights issue” and society will eventually “come around” to the “right” belief.
No state has legalized gay marriage via a vote By The People. In fact, gay marriage has been denied in every vote on the issue. Only courts rulings and state legislatures ramming it down the throats of The People have resulted in gay marriage legalization. That’s NOT democracy.
Hold on a sec... NY allows Civil Unions. So, what's the problem?
NYS has never been a leader in anything, NOTHING!! Go back and see we've had one of the most conservative and non-progressive govts in the country. It should be moved to the South "South NYS".
Re: Malcolm Smith
Nothing like selling out your gay constituents for guaranteed power. Boy, will this be remembered! Oh, yeah...Be sure to send us fund-raising letters.
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm
your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the
right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the
Comment Guidelines before
By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's
It's your neighborhood, your city, your country, your world, and now your website. Brian Lehrer delves into the issues and links them to real life.