New York law enforcement has a few initiatives in the works that would keep closer tabs on vehicles in the city. The New York Times Police Bureau Chief Al Baker gives the details.
Al Baker is a biased reporter. Note that his article in today's NYT did not quote one voice of opposition to this plan, only a throwaway line about "tracking many thousands of vehicles and people every day raises alarm with civil libertarians."
At the NYT, "civil libertarians" is equivalent to a four-letter word.
So much for journalistic objectivity...it's amusing to see the Murdoch-owned NY Post and Zuckerman's Daily News take a harder line towards the NYPD's increasingly corrupt and brutal officers than every liberal's favorite paper.
Guess we have to make a sacrifice for our freedoms - let's get those barcodes on our foreheads and get it over with!
Aug. 12 2008 02:17 PM
Score: 0/0
Phoebe
from NJ
Graham: What are the "terrorists" resisting? Bin Laden facing injustice? Islamic domination and subjugation "injustice"? I assume that is Paris, France. Typical.
There is injustice, but this is not the reason many people turn to terrorism. It's the belief that they are doing something "divine" to bring their heavenly realm to Earth. And that is something all rational people should resist. (And I'll include the Religious Right & Bush).
Aug. 12 2008 11:45 AM
Score: 0/0
chris o
from new york city
Bicycle, bicycle, bicycle...
Aug. 12 2008 11:41 AM
Score: 0/0
Graham
from Paris
"Simply doing what has to be done"?
The cameras won't stop the "next big attack" since, as this measure is now known, it'll be defeated, circumvented.
The bomb-laden vehicle will only enter once---the occasion when it is set off.
Instead of making ourselves into an armed camp, why not make the world more just, so that "terrorists"---who are resisting (unlike Americans) injustice---are motivated & provoked to resort to violence?
You cannot forsee or prevent every potential menace, unless you arrest and confine everyone all the time. Before we come to that, we'd better think again.
Aug. 12 2008 11:41 AM
Score: 0/0
hjs
from 11211
we should all work from home and NEVER leave our apartments.
Aug. 12 2008 11:40 AM
Score: 0/0
O
from Forest Hills
Fruit of the poisonous tree? I wonder what case law that comes from?
It's not statutory. Mhhhhmmm........
Without those more educated than us to guide us on what is correct and proper, we don't know what is going on. I wish someone would explain the difference to me and help me to better understand, I sit in my ignorance not understanding.
Woah is me...
I think even if we throw out fruit of the poisonous tree, it will not make a difference.
Aug. 12 2008 11:39 AM
Score: 0/0
Hugh
from Crown Heights
With respect to the caller (David) splitting hairs:
When an Arab or Muslim is found carrying a gun on the subway, will David automatically call him a terrorist?
He already lumped Arabs and Muslims together as terrorists. That's step one on the racist way.
Moreover, we already have instances of data collection by police agencies where the agency assured us that data was deleted and the claim was found to be FALSE.
Aug. 12 2008 11:39 AM
Score: 0/0
the truth
from Atlanta/New York
More reason to invade privacy and violate people's 4th amendment rights.
Aug. 12 2008 11:37 AM
Score: 0/0
Robert Sinclair
from Manhattan
We have been monitored for years. There are many cameras everywhere. Everytime you go near and ATM, an intersection with cameras, private security cameras on private building, the police cameras. Cameras are everywere.
Aug. 12 2008 11:37 AM
Score: 0/0
Susan
from Kingston, New York
Kelly is making New York City a police state! Why would anyone want to work there or visit there?
Aug. 12 2008 11:37 AM
Score: 0/0
Erik
from Manhattan
Ridiculous. We already have cameras in shops and all over the city. But the quality of the images is so bad that they are close to worthless. Witness the crappy images (close to useless) captured when the Times Square Military Recruiting Center was attacked a few months ago. Is there any place in the US that is covered by more cameras than Times Square?
Aug. 12 2008 11:37 AM
Score: 0/0
Bill
from Middletown, NJ
If the gov't is collecting this info then the best safegaurd is to make it ALL publicly visible from the web. That includes Police, FBI, private, commercial, those in 'protected' status (battered wives, etc); EVERY IMAGE, no edits (this goes for DMV ticket cameras too). If its publicly viewable from city street then it should enjoy no privelege from visibility from the web. A free press will take over abuse issues from there...
Aug. 12 2008 11:36 AM
Score: 0/0
O
from Forest Hills
#11, you make a good point. I think we know we cannot trust this government to be law abiding. Certain people think they are above the law in the US and they make their own laws as they go, current resident of the White House included.
Aug. 12 2008 11:36 AM
Score: 0/0
Graham
from Paris
What's to stop them from next requiring that everyone have a "rfi" chip implanted and automatically monitored by surveillance points which cover virtually any point?
Are people gonna stand for that, too?
Why not strip searches on entering or leaving any place?
There's now no line where the government must stop. No line.
Aug. 12 2008 11:35 AM
Score: 0/0
CH
It isn't so much a case of civil liberties and privacy as it is a matter of trustworthy government. The last 8 years has been a time of severe abuses of power. It isn't that I am worried about what I am doing, but I am very concerned about what those who gather the information—not only current lawmakers, but future administrations as well—will do with the data and how well they will safeguard it.
Aug. 12 2008 11:34 AM
Score: 0/0
World's Toughest Milkman
from the_C_train
I don't believe that this has anything to do with prevention, it is all about reviewing the images after an incident happens.
Aug. 12 2008 11:34 AM
Score: 0/0
rae
from flatbush
How would the information gathered be useful--or even usable? It just seems like an awful lot of information not targeted at anything in particular....
Aug. 12 2008 11:32 AM
Score: 0/0
Sassi
from Brooklyn
Kelly is a jerk. Why is he allowed to right law, or decide how many rights private citizens have? Who the hell does he think he is? We have to vote that idiot off the islands.
Aug. 12 2008 11:32 AM
Score: 0/0
Caitlin
Wasn't this exact item a Brian Lehrer Show April Fools story?! The city is paying attention!
Aug. 12 2008 11:31 AM
Score: 0/0
Hugh
from Crown Heights
In Boston, license plate numbers of city officials are anonymous. That is, there is no database to match up a license number with a name. So city officials can violate traffic laws with impunity.
Is this the case in New York. If so, then a terrorist need only steal the license number of a city flunkie and bobs your uncle.
One thing is certain. Ray Kelly, Mikey Bloomberg, Christine Quinn and others will somehow be exempted.
Aug. 12 2008 11:31 AM
Score: 0/0
Robert
from NYC
Ray Kelly's a fascist and I despise the man and always have. Even Giuliani (yet another fascist) didn't like him. There's been nothing but trouble since he became Commissioner under this mayor. People like him should not be allowed to have any power in a democratic society but then this isn't that anymore it's a Bush society.
Aug. 12 2008 11:30 AM
Score: 0/0
Susan
from Kingston, New York
This is how they spend all of our tax money, toll money, etc., etc., etc. So instead of re building the infrastructure of our cities, all they want to do is spy on innocent people for the most part. Ridiculous!
Aug. 12 2008 11:29 AM
Score: 0/0
O
from Forest Hills
Wonderful, more violations of our civil rights. As if the "random" subway searches were not enough. Who wants to be frisked on the way to work?
Big Brother is watching us. Next they will read our diaries and monitor our thoughts.
Keep the rabble in line so that we don't get out of hand and want to make too much money or health insurance.
This is another excuse by the police to molest us and to search us without needing to fulfill People v. DeBour where they would need a reasonable suspicion or probable cause.
Oy!!
Aug. 12 2008 11:26 AM
Score: 0/0
MichaelB
from UWS of Manhattan
Theoretical at best. In reality, there'll be an increase in the "sardine car" all clustered by the doors.
The key wil be to have the poles placed in the correct locations in the car, to encourage people to MOVE INTO THE CENTER of the car.
Aug. 12 2008 11:09 AM
Score: 0/0
michaelw
from INWOOD
All this is revenue revenue revenue.
Gouge the citizenry as much as possible because the NYC government is corrupt and unable to manage.
Aug. 12 2008 11:01 AM
Score: 0/0
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more.
Learn more. Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm
your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the
right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the
Comment Guidelines before
posting.
By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's
Privacy Policy and
Terms Of Use.
Comments [25]
Al Baker is a biased reporter. Note that his article in today's NYT did not quote one voice of opposition to this plan, only a throwaway line about "tracking many thousands of vehicles and people every day raises alarm with civil libertarians."
At the NYT, "civil libertarians" is equivalent to a four-letter word.
So much for journalistic objectivity...it's amusing to see the Murdoch-owned NY Post and Zuckerman's Daily News take a harder line towards the NYPD's increasingly corrupt and brutal officers than every liberal's favorite paper.
Guess we have to make a sacrifice for our freedoms - let's get those barcodes on our foreheads and get it over with!
Graham: What are the "terrorists" resisting? Bin Laden facing injustice? Islamic domination and subjugation "injustice"? I assume that is Paris, France. Typical.
There is injustice, but this is not the reason many people turn to terrorism. It's the belief that they are doing something "divine" to bring their heavenly realm to Earth. And that is something all rational people should resist. (And I'll include the Religious Right & Bush).
Bicycle, bicycle, bicycle...
"Simply doing what has to be done"?
The cameras won't stop the "next big attack" since, as this measure is now known, it'll be defeated, circumvented.
The bomb-laden vehicle will only enter once---the occasion when it is set off.
Instead of making ourselves into an armed camp, why not make the world more just, so that "terrorists"---who are resisting (unlike Americans) injustice---are motivated & provoked to resort to violence?
You cannot forsee or prevent every potential menace, unless you arrest and confine everyone all the time. Before we come to that, we'd better think again.
we should all work from home and NEVER leave our apartments.
Fruit of the poisonous tree? I wonder what case law that comes from?
It's not statutory. Mhhhhmmm........
Without those more educated than us to guide us on what is correct and proper, we don't know what is going on. I wish someone would explain the difference to me and help me to better understand, I sit in my ignorance not understanding.
Woah is me...
I think even if we throw out fruit of the poisonous tree, it will not make a difference.
With respect to the caller (David) splitting hairs:
When an Arab or Muslim is found carrying a gun on the subway, will David automatically call him a terrorist?
He already lumped Arabs and Muslims together as terrorists. That's step one on the racist way.
Moreover, we already have instances of data collection by police agencies where the agency assured us that data was deleted and the claim was found to be FALSE.
More reason to invade privacy and violate people's 4th amendment rights.
We have been monitored for years. There are many cameras everywhere. Everytime you go near and ATM, an intersection with cameras, private security cameras on private building, the police cameras. Cameras are everywere.
Kelly is making New York City a police state! Why would anyone want to work there or visit there?
Ridiculous.
We already have cameras in shops and all over the city. But the quality of the images is so bad that they are close to worthless. Witness the crappy images (close to useless) captured when the Times Square Military Recruiting Center was attacked a few months ago. Is there any place in the US that is covered by more cameras than Times Square?
If the gov't is collecting this info then the best safegaurd is to make it ALL publicly visible from the web. That includes Police, FBI, private, commercial, those in 'protected' status (battered wives, etc); EVERY IMAGE, no edits (this goes for DMV ticket cameras too). If its publicly viewable from city street then it should enjoy no privelege from visibility from the web. A free press will take over abuse issues from there...
#11, you make a good point. I think we know we cannot trust this government to be law abiding. Certain people think they are above the law in the US and they make their own laws as they go, current resident of the White House included.
What's to stop them from next requiring that everyone have a "rfi" chip implanted and automatically monitored by surveillance points which cover virtually any point?
Are people gonna stand for that, too?
Why not strip searches on entering or leaving any place?
There's now no line where the government must stop. No line.
It isn't so much a case of civil liberties and privacy as it is a matter of trustworthy government. The last 8 years has been a time of severe abuses of power. It isn't that I am worried about what I am doing, but I am very concerned about what those who gather the information—not only current lawmakers, but future administrations as well—will do with the data and how well they will safeguard it.
I don't believe that this has anything to do with prevention, it is all about reviewing the images after an incident happens.
How would the information gathered be useful--or even usable? It just seems like an awful lot of information not targeted at anything in particular....
Kelly is a jerk. Why is he allowed to right law, or decide how many rights private citizens have? Who the hell does he think he is? We have to vote that idiot off the islands.
Wasn't this exact item a Brian Lehrer Show April Fools story?! The city is paying attention!
In Boston, license plate numbers of city officials are anonymous. That is, there is no database to match up a license number with a name. So city officials can violate traffic laws with impunity.
Is this the case in New York. If so, then a terrorist need only steal the license number of a city flunkie and bobs your uncle.
One thing is certain. Ray Kelly, Mikey Bloomberg, Christine Quinn and others will somehow be exempted.
Ray Kelly's a fascist and I despise the man and always have. Even Giuliani (yet another fascist) didn't like him. There's been nothing but trouble since he became Commissioner under this mayor. People like him should not be allowed to have any power in a democratic society but then this isn't that anymore it's a Bush society.
This is how they spend all of our tax money, toll money, etc., etc., etc. So instead of re building the infrastructure of our cities, all they want to do is spy on innocent people for the most part. Ridiculous!
Wonderful, more violations of our civil rights. As if the "random" subway searches were not enough. Who wants to be frisked on the way to work?
Big Brother is watching us. Next they will read our diaries and monitor our thoughts.
Keep the rabble in line so that we don't get out of hand and want to make too much money or health insurance.
This is another excuse by the police to molest us and to search us without needing to fulfill People v. DeBour where they would need a reasonable suspicion or probable cause.
Oy!!
Theoretical at best. In reality, there'll be an increase in the "sardine car" all clustered by the doors.
The key wil be to have the poles placed in the correct locations in the car, to encourage people to MOVE INTO THE CENTER of the car.
All this is revenue revenue revenue.
Gouge the citizenry as much as possible because the NYC government is corrupt and unable to manage.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.