With regard to this morning’s discussion of campaign finance:
I think two issues are bring confused.
One is the prevention of politicians from taking money for their votes. (This might be campaign contributions, gifts, jobs for family members, or jobs after leaving office.) What is going on is obscene and is often criminal bribery. It should be stopped through enforcement of existing bribery laws and the enactment of new laws.
However, something else is also going on. Various entities, obviously some with a lot of money, express their point of view TO THE PUBLIC, often through advertising, but also through “conservative” talk radio, and “liberal” newspapers, TV networks, and NPR radio.
It is interesting to note that advocacy of reform makes reference to the first (BRIBERY), and then proposes regulating the second (THE PUBLIC ACCESS TO POLITICAL INFORMATION).
Specifically what is advocated is the regulation of “conservative” talk radio and corporate political advertising. Stricter bribery laws are not advocated.
I think we are seeing one of the most dangerous attempts to regulate WHAT POLITICAL INFORMATION THE PUBLIC CAN HEAR in our history, using arguments about BRIBERY as a reason.
Brian, you gotta be more aggressive at catching these guys.
John from Manhattan A decades long dedicated listener
Jun. 26 2007 10:59 AM
Score: 0/0
John Celardo
from Fanwood, NJ
When the Court’s majority was not in their favor, any ruling against the conservative agenda resulted in cries of “activist judges.” The campaign funding decision in particular seems to be an attempt to legislate from the bench. Isn’t that judicial activism?
Jun. 26 2007 10:13 AM
Score: 0/0
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more.
Learn more. Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm
your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the
right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the
Comment Guidelines before
posting.
By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's
Privacy Policy and
Terms Of Use.
Comments [2]
With regard to this morning’s discussion of campaign finance:
I think two issues are bring confused.
One is the prevention of politicians from taking money for their votes. (This might be campaign contributions, gifts, jobs for family members, or jobs after leaving office.) What is going on is obscene and is often criminal bribery. It should be stopped through enforcement of existing bribery laws and the enactment of new laws.
However, something else is also going on. Various entities, obviously some with a lot of money, express their point of view TO THE PUBLIC, often through advertising, but also through “conservative” talk radio, and “liberal” newspapers, TV networks, and NPR radio.
It is interesting to note that advocacy of reform makes reference to the first (BRIBERY), and then proposes regulating the second (THE PUBLIC ACCESS TO POLITICAL INFORMATION).
Specifically what is advocated is the regulation of “conservative” talk radio and corporate political advertising. Stricter bribery laws are not advocated.
I think we are seeing one of the most dangerous attempts to regulate WHAT POLITICAL INFORMATION THE PUBLIC CAN HEAR in our history, using arguments about BRIBERY as a reason.
Brian, you gotta be more aggressive at catching these guys.
John from Manhattan
A decades long dedicated listener
When the Court’s majority was not in their favor, any ruling against the conservative agenda resulted in cries of “activist judges.” The campaign funding decision in particular seems to be an attempt to legislate from the bench. Isn’t that judicial activism?
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.