Sponsor

wnyc.org / 93.9fm / am 820

Building Blocks

« previous episode | next episode »

Tuesday, February 22, 2005

Architectural critic for the New Republic, Martin Filler has been studying the rebuilding efforts at the World Trade Center site. As a result of his research he believes that both Daniel Libeskind, architect of the Freedom Tower and Michael Arad, designer of the Memorial, have been made obsolete participants in the rebuilding effort.

How Many Homeless?

Linda Gibbs, Commissioner of NYC Department of Homeless Services, on the upcoming census of the homeless and the Special Masters report
» NYC Department of Homeless Services

Comment

Do As I Say... Call-In

Listeners weigh in on President Bush's strategy of not acknowledging past drug use in order to not encourage experimentation by today's teens

Comment

Plaza

John Turchiano Spokesman for the New York Hotel Trades Council wants to protect union workers at the Plaza hotel which may be converted into condos.

Comment

Fools (and the Self-Serving) Rush in

Martin Filler Architecture critic for the New Republic and contribute to the New York Review of Books says a great opportunity has been lost in the rebuilding of the World Trade Center site
» Filling the Hole

Comment

The Olympick of the Crop

Derick Hulme, Professor of International Affairs at Alma College in Michigan and author, The Political Olympics : Moscow, Afghanistan, and the 1980 U.S. Boycott (Praeger 1990), says New York still has a chance at hosting the 2012 Games
» Derick Hulme
and
Andrea Bernstein, WNYC ...

Comment

Stories To Tell

What are the stories you tell your friends and family about life where your live? Email us and then call in tomorrow to share your stories from your block, neighborhood, or city.

Comment

Social Security Part 4: Mathematics 1

If after yesterday's installment in our Social Security series (Mathematics, Part 1), you're still confused about how your social security benefits are calculated, we received this email from a 31-year claims representative who kindly explains it all in detail:

When figuring a retirement benefit, 35 years of earnings are used. People who have 35 years of earnings get the highest benefit payments. If you don't have 35 years of earnings, and many people do not - for a variety of reasons- out of work, out of country, out for raising children, self employed and not paying in (even though they should have been,) working off the books (a very common one) we still divide by 35, to determine your average, so if you only have 28 years, as an example, you have 7 zeroes in the computation which brings down your average. If you only had 10 years of earnings in the U.S. (which is the minimum number of years needed to qualify for "something", that "something is determined by still divided by 35, which makes it a relatively low benefit payment. ...

Comment