On Demand
Headlines
- Dr. Atomic Hits the Met
- Quinn Backs Bloomberg's Effort to Change Term Limit Law
- Children's Fiction Tackles Economic Uncertainty
- New Yorkers React to Connecticut Ruling on Same-Sex Marriage
- Chelsea Fire Kills 5 Members of One Family
- More
- Paulson Meets With Bank CEOs On Rescue Plan
- Krugman Wins Nobel Prize In Economics
- McCain Campaigns In Va., N.C.
- More
- Bush admin. looks to expand financial rescue
- Manic Monday: Dow roars back from worst week ever
- McCain offers tougher critcism of Bush economics
- More
Vote 2008: WNYC's Election Coverage
Art.Cult blog
Street Shots: NYC Photography
Studio 360: Klezmer in Krakow
The Takeaway: Electoral College prediction tracker
The Toni Morrison Lectures: Newark Mayor Cory Booker
Radiolab LIVE in Chicago!
News
Closing Arguments in Case Against the Former Head of the EPA
by Fred Mogul
NEW YORK, NY December 10, 2007 —A federal appeals court heard arguments today about whether former Environmental Protection Agency head Christine Todd Whitman can be sued for her actions following the World Trade Center Attacks. WNYC’s Fred Mogul has more.
A lower court ruled that Whitman’s statements about post-9/11 air quality were quote,“conscience-shocking,” and amounted to her violating the due-process rights of residents, office workers and students in Lower Manhattan. The appeals panel, however, questioned the legal claim, with Judge Jon Newman asking one of the lawyers, “Even if you’re right, how does the head of an agency become liable to pay damages?” Plaintiffs Attorney Sherrie Savett said a high-level official should be as liable as a police officer in a brutality claim.
When Newman pointed out there was no precedent for an official being held liable in a large class-action suit, Savett said there was no precedent similar to 9/11. For WNYC, I’m Fred Mogul.