"Susan Komen would not give in to bullies or to fear. Too bad the foundation bearing her name did," tweeted Judy Blume, proving she continues to be a talented communicator even when she's constrained to 140 characters. In those two sentences, Blume captured what's at the heart of the charity's decision to abruptly pull funding for breast cancer screenings from their longtime partner Planned Parenthood. They gave into a bully—the radical right, which is continuing its assault on women's health and its obsessive crusade to destroy Planned Parenthood.
[Updated: In a statement Friday morning, the Komen Foundation reversed its decision to pull funding from Planned Parenthood.]
[Updated: On Tuesday morning, Komen Vice-President for Public Policy Karen Hadel announced her resignation.]
The good news is that a wide array of allies who care about women's health are not giving in with them, as has been clear by the uproar that immediately followed the foundation's announcement. From the press releases of health advocates talking about the important role of Planned Parenthood, to netroots activists charting the relentless attacks on the organization, to Mayor Bloomberg, who donated a quarter-million dollars to the beleaguered healthcare providers, supporters are stepping forward quickly and loudly.
This is of the utmost importance to the countless women who rely on Planned Parenthood for cancer screenings and other services. Many of these women turn to the clinics as their only affordable and accessible avenue of care.
But it's also important to every person who cares about women's rights and women's health—because this fight isn't only about where Susan G. Komen for the Cure invests its capital. Social conservatives want to end Planned Parenthood. And Planned Parenthood needs its allies on countless fronts.
From the defunding battle in last year's budget to stricter rules governing clinics in many states, Planned Parenthood knows it has enemies. This is nothing new. As Jill Lepore recounted recently in the New Yorker, Planned Parenthood has been under attack since Margaret Sanger opened its first clinic nearly a century ago.
The attacks these days are just as ugly and as ignorant—from Senator Kyl's claim that 90 percent of the organization's work is providing abortions (a statement he amended to say he didn't mean it as a fact) to the efforts of right-wing gotcha guerillas to discredit Planned Parenthood as they did with ACORN. Before becoming a conservative target, ACORN helped organize and empower low-income Americans and had been the largest source of voter registration among those communities. After the assault, they ceased to exist.
In the ACORN case, too many of its allies were slow to come to its defense, timid in their push-back and too willing to believe reason would prevail. They were surprised just how quickly reason failed, and how totally an organization doing important national work was dismantled.
Maybe Planned Parenthood's allies learned from that example and were quicker and louder to the defense. Or maybe Planned Parenthood just has more influential allies. Despite Kyl's claim, many women know the organization for their range of services, and an astonishing number have used the network of clinics for basic care, especially as young women. A year ago, I suggested this "war on women" would lead to a backlash against the right-wing which fundamentally misunderstands the role Planned Parenthood plays in America.
While they failed to defund Planned Parenthood in Congress, the bullies of the radical right are finding new avenues, and have turned an internationally-lauded foundation into a pawn. Whatever the Susan G. Komen foundation decides, at least Planned Parenthood's allies are making clear they are going to stand up to bullies—good news for the organization and for the large number of our fellow Americans it serves each year.
Comments [2]
Komen Gone Wild – Charity goes Business goes Political
What do you get when you mix politics with religion? You get bad decisions. You get bad governmental decisions, bad business decisions, bad moral decisions, and bad social decisions. Surprisingly no one appears to learn from their mistakes in this arena. And our latest contender for ‘My Morals Are Better Than Your Morals’ imbecile is the Susan G. Komen foundation leadership. Komen’s decision to stop funding the Planned Parenthood organization was not influenced by political pressure according to her eminence Nancy Brinker. Her political affiliation and that of one of her new board of directors a strident pro-lifer in no way had any influence on the foundations’ decision.
Now this assertion is stupid on so many levels. Her core beliefs have no influence on how she conducts her life and her decisions. Sounds like a characteristic you would attribute to someone you wouldn’t want to be associated with, depend upon, and certainly not look to as the administering head of an organization; particularly one seeking to operate a charitable public serving organization. Ms. Brinker is so concerned about helping women and finding a cure for breast cancer that she is willing to stop funding a group that helps women, particularly poor women receive breast cancer exams. Makes you wonder which of her core beliefs she is applying here: aiding the sick, helping the poor & less fortunate, showing compassion to her fellow women, treating others as you would have them treat you, judging not, or even how this reflect on your sister’s memory.
But she is probably acting in the best interest of her business. The Komen foundation is after all a business. Under her leadership, she has determined that her business prospers more by aligning with a Pro-life mode of operation than, well independently and based on principles of honor & integrity. Selling out is not an atypical business strategy. Her keen sense of the priority of tainted political divisive social philosophies over that of women’s health should resonate with the general public. Picking a side in a debate that is outside her business’ arena is one of the sure signs of a savvy businesswoman.
This decision will surely encourage more donations and support and thus the goals of the foundation will be furthered. This decision will not promote the development of a competing charitable foundation that promotes its apolitical nature and a commitment to support and advance women’s health related to breast cancer without judging the political, moral, religious or societal values of the women or the donors.
It certainly seems that the Komen foundation remains in good hands, lead by people who are willing to help women if those women hold acceptable beliefs and opinions. With any hope, Ms. Brinker will not have to have such charity start at home; and I am sure that she will be more than adequately compensated by the Foundation for her outstanding leadership.
"Updated: In a statement Friday morning, the Komen Foundation reversed its decision to pull funding from Planned Parenthood".
The first decision of the Komen Foundation was their own but this hasty reversal was clearly forced.
What was that about bullies again?
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.