Coming just a few days after President Obama embraced gay marriage, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney's commencement speech at Liberty University emphasized the strength and power that comes from religious faithfulness. “Moral certainty, clear standards, and a commitment to spiritual ideals will set you apart in a world that searches for meaning,” Romney told the Liberty graduating class.
When Romney addressed the 2010 graduating class at Groton School, the elite private boarding school in Massachusetts, it was a different message. He implored graduates to find the courage to question social and political orthodoxy and left references to religion and Christianity largely out.
“People at the top don’t always know as much as they think they know,” Romney said in 2010, according to a reprint in the Groton alumni magazine. “It’s not a liberal thought. It’s a conservative thought. Question authority, even if it’s usually right.”
He continued, “The observation, that the conventional wisdom may be incorrect, that the authorities may have it wrong, has been a very important factor in the degree of success I have enjoyed in business or in public service and particularly, in my personal life."
That's in contrast to his message to the 2012 class from the Christian school in Virginia, where he celebrated their readiness to "leave Liberty with conviction and confidence as your armor." At Groton, Romney emphasized the need for analytical flexibility, noting in particular that truisms that were considered academic gospel when he was a student simply “turned out not to be so.”
“I learned in science that the planet was cooling and that we were facing the return of an ice age,” he said in 2010. “Politically, I learned that Detroit was about to become a model city for the entire nation.”
This was not the only reference to climate change in the 2010 speech. Romney also mentioned that within forty years in America, “I believe we will free ourselves from oil and keep the planet from melting down.”
As a testament to his willingness to challenge conventional wisdom, Romney offered the example of his decision at Bain Capital to an early backer of office supply store Staples — though with more familiarity than usual in front of the Groton crowd as he referenced “Will Stemberg ’10’s father,” Staples co-founder Tom Stemberg.
That sense of shared experience shows up throughout Romney’s address to the boarding school class. He mentioned his time at Michigan’s Cranbrook School, which he called “an Episcopal school that was not unlike Groton.” That came after Romney opened with a joke about a misunderstanding with a farmer to show how "you have to be careful not to let your superior education go to your heads.”
But the two commencement addresses are not strictly contradictory. To both audiences, Romney depicted himself as a man who, on the one hand, believes in casting aside old assumptions when new facts dispute them, while standing on private principles worthy of fierce protection from the judgments of others.
And both speeches hinge on very similar descriptions of America’s essential character — or "culture," as Romney called it.
“What is it about America’s culture that has led us to become the most powerful nation in history? I believe it includes the value we attach to education, to hard work, to family formation, to our willingness to take risks, to our innovativeness, to our pioneering nature,” Romney said at Groton 2010. “And, not incidentally, to our inclination to question authority.”
Two years later at Liberty University, the Republican presidential candidate described the country's foundations in the same way.
“The American culture promotes personal responsibility, the dignity of work, the value of education, the merit of service, devotion to a purpose greater than self, and, at the foundation, the pre-eminence of family," Romney said.
In 2012, though, Romney emphasized the certitude of those priorities and their unchanging nature over time — which led right up to his applause line defending marriage as an institution between one man and one woman.
At Groton in 2010, Romney allowed more nuance.
“Usually what authority says is spot on,” he said. “But not always.”
Comments [4]
Instead of combing though Romney's commencement speeches how about reviewing Obama's actual voting record as US Senator on the debt ceiling and his calls to reduce the debt in 2008 before increasing it by trillions as President as well as the full flip-flop on same sex marriage to name just a few?
Isn't all that slightly more relevant?
I agree they're not contradictory stances.
If we assume Romney trult believes in challenging conventional wisdom (per his 2010), he may think conservatives at Liberty are not open to "challenging authority" within the evangelical/ church, family, or university structures. Otherwise, why not repeat a theme which has such resonance when he wants to shake up the White House?
Even so, evangelicals are open to challenging authority external to their dogma. I would say they are very willing to do so and he could couched the "2010" manner of questioning authority in that sense.
Indeed, the success of the dual political and religious evangelical movement since 1970 has relied upon challenging a narrow left-right conception; developing alternative media and platforms; writing their own playbook for how to curry favor in government; playing a victim card of their own, etc.
The bland comment that Liberty students possess "moral certainty, clear standards, and a commitment to spiritual ideals" echoes the popular conclusion that evangelicals walk in moral lockstep. It also dog-whistles (to self-righteous evangelicals) that atheistic, agnostic, and irreligious people lack for a common culture of moral certainty or lack moral convictions altogether.
Thus, Romney implies that Liberty students hold a position of moral highground in the certainty of their convictions... which is what they want to hear... without denigrating others by comparison. That contrast or comparison is left for the listener to conclude.
Brandt:
It's extremely bad form to refer to Mormon "magic underwear." They're called temple garments.
All religions have styles of dress or religious iconography which they use to identify themselves, to pay homage to tradition, to connect them to their faith, etc. Much of it is worn. Some is carried or only used ceremonially.
Here's a short list of examples: rosary beads; tefellin; yarmulkes and zuchetto; incense; holy water; Hindu/ Brahmin sacred thread; the cross; the Star of David; the menorah; the Evil Eye and Hamsa; the Kabba itself; abaya and hijab and niqab and burqa... the list goes on and on.
Romney’s Magic Mormon Underwear protects him from the evils of the world including socialism, homosexuality and taxes on his inherited wealth. Can these sacred garments also make it rain down enough cash for a victory in the race since well over 90% of public offices are bought in our country? Drop by to discuss tighty whities and the role of money in politics at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2012/05/mitt-romneys-magic-mormon-underwear.html
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.