Stephen Reader covers politics for It's a Free Country, WNYC's interactive politics site. He joined the station in 2010 and has also worked for Studio 360, WNYC's Peabody Award-winning show about art, culture, and creativity.
What We Learned from Obama's Tax Speech
Monday, July 09, 2012
Stop us if you’ve heard this one before.
President Obama announced on Monday that he would seek a one-year extension of the Bush-era tax cuts for people making less than $250,000 a year. The cuts would expire at the end of 2012 for people earning more than $250,000 – a 4.6 percent increase to the top tax rate that’s estimated to bring in $850 billion in revenue over the next decade.
This debate should be agonizingly familiar by now: it’s the same conversation we had about the Bush tax cuts back in the fall of 2010; it’s the same sally that accompanied the deficit-reduction deadlines we set for ourselves (and promptly ignored) last November; it’s a lot like the conversation about extending the payroll tax cut, which we’ve had twice in the last 8 months.
Democrats want to raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans. Republicans don’t. In this light, it’s no surprise that a new Pew Research poll shows that a majority of Americans find the presidential campaign “too long and dull” – look no further than Monday’s “news” for an explanation the lack of interest.
Because this is not news. We’ve long known where both parties stand. We’ve been offered plenty of solutions from politicians, pundits, candidates, think-tankers, Simpson-Bowles, and on and on. (Look no further than here and here for some examples.) Washington just hasn’t been keen on accepting any of them.
“It’s not a lack of plans or ideas,” President Obama said, “it’s a stalemate in this town, in Washington, between two very different views about which direction go in as a country. Nowhere is this more pronounced than on the issue of taxes.”
He’s got that right. Not only are there two very different views about the way forward, there are two very different narratives about the road we’ve traveled, a discrepancy the President addressed Monday.
“I’ve cut taxes for the middle class every year that I’ve been president,” Obama said. “Since I’ve been in office, we’ve cut taxes for the typical middle class family by $3,600 – I wanted to repeat that because sometimes there’s a little bit of misinformation out there. Folks seem to be confused about it.”
Obama predicted the GOP talking points to the contrary of his tax plan: that it will hurt small businesses and slow economic growth as job creators have to give more of their money to the federal government.
Obama argued that he had cut taxes on small businesses 18 times during his term in office. To the point about job creators, he stressed that the tax increase was simply a return to the way we did business under President Clinton – when the top tax rate was 39.6 percent.
“Back when the economy created 23 million jobs, the biggest surplus in history, and plenty of millionaires to boot,” Obama added.
If there was one new element to Obama’s argument on Monday, it was his suggesting that the tax cut extension for higher-income earners could be its own debate, one that happens after the election in November.
“We can have that debate,” Obama said. “But let’s not hold up working on the thing we already agree on. In many ways, the fate of the tax cuts [for the wealthiest Americans] will be decided by the outcome of the next election. My opponent will fight to keep them in place; I will fight to end them. But that argument shouldn’t threaten you. It shouldn’t threaten 98 percent of Americans who just want to know their taxes won’t go up next year.”
President Obama said he would sign a bill extending the Bush tax cuts for people making less than $250,000 “tomorrow.” Even with the offer to have a separate debate about the cuts for high-income earners, history tells us House Republicans won’t have that bill ready for him Tuesday morning.
“We're looking forward to the conversation with the White House over extending all of the current rates,” said House Speaker John Boehner – in November, 2010, when we were having the exact same debate.