Streams

Landmarks Commission to Hold Hearings on New West End Historic District

Monday, March 21, 2011

A new historic district proposed for Manhattan's Upper West Side is causing a rift between preservation advocates and the Real Estate Board of New York.

On Tuesday, the city’s Landmark Preservation Commission will hold public hearings on the creation of a massive West End Historic District. The proposed district would cover an area bound by 70th Street to the south, 109th Street to the north, Riverside Drive to the east and Broadway to the west. If approved, 800 buildings would be given landmark status on top of the 2,600 buildings that already have that status on the Upper West Side. The distinction could make the uptown enclave the neighborhood with the most landmark buildings in the city.

“We are very optimistic,” said Kate Wood, director of Landmark West!, an advocacy group founded in 1985 to organize community support for new landmarks on the Upper West Side.

Along with another organization, the West End Preservation Society, Wood's group has been working to build a consensus among property owners in the area in favor of the new district.

“There is a huge amount of public support, and there’s a lot of research that has been done to show that this area truly merits historic district protection—architecturally, socially, historically, and culturally,” she said.

The proposal does have opponents however—namely the Real Estate Board of New York, which argues that the historic district will limit the economic potential of the neighborhood.

“What it does do is add economic burdens to the property,” said Michael Slattery, a board vice president. “It's very hard for a retailer who wants to come in to sign a lease for space. They're not sure before then whether they can actually get the facade work done that they would prefer that makes their building profitable.”

Exisiting historic districts on the UWSAfter a building receives landmark status, property owners must receive permission before embarking on additional construction or making renovations to existing buildings.

While landmark opponents claim that these protections stifle development, Wood disagrees.

“Historic district protection manages that change so that when development does occur, it happens in a way that doesn’t undermine the character of the area,” she said.

When considering neighborhoods for historic district status, the Landmark Preservation Commission looks for three things: representation of at least one style of architecture, a “coherent streetscape,” and a “distinct sense of place.”

Michael Slattery, of the Real Estate Board, said he didn't believe the proposed West End Historic District meets those criteria.

“Including Broadway in that area seems inappropriate to me. It’s not the same character at all," he said. "It’s a commercial street not a residential street.”

At press time, Slattery said that the board had not yet seen any report showing how each building fits into the "distinct sense of place" required for landmark status.

According to the Landmarks Preservation Commission, most of the buildings in the proposed district were constructed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and were built in Queen Anne, Romanesque, and Dutch Renaissance Revival styles, among others. The district would also include some of the taller residential buildings constructed after World War I that lack some of the detailed ornamentation seen elsewhere in the neighborhood.

The Upper West Side is currently home to seven historic districts, five of which are in the area between West End Avenue and Riverside Drive (see map above-right). The proposed district would unite those five districts into a single, expanded district.

The current push to expand the district began in 2009, when two brownstones on West End Avenue were demolished by developers. The move angered some residents. A spokesperson for the Landmark Preservation Commission said that buildings within historic districts are rarely approved for demolition, except for rare cases when the building doesn’t match the character of the surrounding area.

Tuesday’s meeting will only address the stretch of the proposed historic district that falls between 79th Street and 87th Street (see map below). Hearings for the other two sections are scheduled for June and October respectively.

After each hearing, the Landmarks Preservation Comission will research the proposal and create reports that will eventually go to the City Council for ratification. The proposal could take anywhere from a few months to years before a decision as to the historic district status is made.

A map detailing the city's plans for expansion of the West End Historic District

Tags:

More in:

Comments [2]

Ann Shirazi from UWS

While I don't disagree with the above comment that there must be a mechanism created to protect residents of the UWS (and everywhere) from losing our/their homes, the WEPS attempt to landmark the West End area is to protect existing buildings from demolition, as in the case of numerous vulnerable buildings and brownstones on the Upper West Side, three of which were bulldozed to build the hideous structures for the wealthy on both the East and West sides of Broadway at 100th Street and the brownstone near 96th Street. This vulnerability not only destroys the historic integrity and neighborhood quality of the Upper West Side, but continues to encourage even more unscrupulous developers looking for "soft sites", or other buildings they can easily demolish, as well as wealthy buyers who have no commitment to the neighborhood or the city. In fact, many "owners" are absent, as the apartments are for investment purposes only-they have absolutely no interest in community or its needs. The wanton destruction of our neighborhood is created by zealous greedy developers who erect 30+ story "splinter" buildings on small plots with plans to turn Broadway and beyond into the sterile (and white) high rise-cum-shopping mall called Columbus Avenue. A few years ago we unfortunately didn't stand in front of the bulldozers to stop those abhorrent Ariel towers. But we can at least participate in saving what is still intact. Without imminent landmarking, we can bid a tearful farewell to the already threatened diversity and beauty of our beloved neighborhood.

Oct. 23 2011 02:52 PM
Terence Smallwood from UWS (for now)

Landmarking entire areas has been shown in economic studies to time and time again to disadvantage minorities. It worsens the already tight supply/demand for apartments, which drives up rents. This in turn harms minorities who cannot afford to live in the expensive areas. One need look no farther than the massive "historic district" that is the UES, where rents are sky high and cultural diversity is low. The UES is primarily white. All this will do is drive minorities out of the UWS and make it just as "exclusive" as the UES. We "brown people" are pushed to Bronx and Brooklyn, just like they like it. Pure evil.

Mar. 22 2011 05:12 PM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Sponsored

Feeds

Supported by